<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>British Journal of Anaesthesia - recent issues</title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>British Journal of Anaesthesia - RSS feed of recent issues (covers the latest 3 issues, including the current issue) </description>
<prism:eIssn>1471-6771</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>British Journal of Anaesthesia</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0007-0912</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/5?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/7?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/14?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/26?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/38?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/50?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/61?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/70?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/82?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/89?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/99?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/108?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/130?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/133?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/134?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/134-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/135?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/137?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/138?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/139?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/140?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/140-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/141?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/142?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/143?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/NP?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/729?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/731?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/734?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/739?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/749?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/756?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/763?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/768?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/775?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/779?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/785?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/793?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/800?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/806?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/812?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/820?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/824?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/832?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/839?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/845?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/855?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/862?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/869?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/875?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/882?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/883?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/884?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/886?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/887?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/888?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/889?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/890?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/891?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/893?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/894?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/894-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/895?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/NP?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/585?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/588?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/597?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/608?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/614?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/620?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/626?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/633?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/642?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/650?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/654?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/662?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/667?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/673?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/680?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/686?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/692?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/698?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/704?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/714?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/716?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/717?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/718?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/719?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/720?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/721?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/722?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/724?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/724-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/725?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/726?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/728?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advances in pharmacology and therapeutics]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hopkins, P. M., Hardman, J. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep168</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advances in pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advances in patient comfort: awake, delirious, or restrained]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trivedi, M., Shelly, M., Park, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep127</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advances in patient comfort: awake, delirious, or restrained]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/5?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neurokinin-1 antagonists: a step change in prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting?]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/5?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rowbotham, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep126</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neurokinin-1 antagonists: a step change in prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>6</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/7?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/7?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Despite major advances, emesis remains a major problem in the context of cancer chemotherapy and in the postoperative period. A better understanding of the relevant neurocircuitry, especially the central pattern generator responsible for emesis and the central role of substance P, led to the development of a new class of antiemetics: the neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonists. Aprepitant is the first NK1 receptor antagonist approved for use in postoperative nausea and vomiting, but several other compounds are currently being investigated for their potential as antiemetics in the postoperative and cancer chemotherapy settings.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diemunsch, P., Joshi, G. P., Brichant, J.-F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep125</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>13</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/14?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmacogenomic variability and anaesthesia]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/14?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The concept of &lsquo;personalized medicine&rsquo; in which a knowledge of genetic factors guides prescribing tailored to the individual is popularly considered to be an inevitable consequence of completion of the International Human Genome Project. We should not forget, however, that a personal or family history of one of several uncommon pharmacogenetic conditions has influenced the use of the implicated drug(s) during anaesthesia for the past 50 yr. Although this has been important for those affected, pharmacogenomics heralds the prospect of an individual's genetic profile informing every prescription. Progress has been rapid in some areas, notably cancer chemotherapy where response to treatment can be predicted on the basis of the genetic profile of the tumour cells. The situation is different for most currently available drugs, including those used by anaesthetists, where genetic variability to drug response is presumed to be the result of a complex interaction of multiple factors. We review the nature and investigation of pharmacogenomic variability and contrast the progress made with research into opioid variability with the more limited literature concerning i.v. and inhalation anaesthetics.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Searle, R., Hopkins, P. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep130</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmacogenomic variability and anaesthesia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>25</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/26?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmacokinetic models for propofol--defining and illuminating the devil in the detail]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/26?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The recently introduced open-target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems can be programmed with any pharmacokinetic model, and allow either plasma- or effect-site targeting. With effect-site targeting the goal is to achieve a user-defined target effect-site concentration as rapidly as possible, by manipulating the plasma concentration around the target. Currently systems are pre-programmed with the Marsh and Schnider pharmacokinetic models for propofol. The former is an adapted version of the Gepts model, in which the rate constants are fixed, whereas compartment volumes and clearances are weight proportional. The Schnider model was developed during combined pharmacokinetic&ndash;pharmacodynamic modelling studies. It has fixed values for V1, V3, k<SUB>13</SUB>, and k<SUB>31</SUB>, adjusts V2, k<SUB>12</SUB>, and k<SUB>21</SUB> for age, and adjusts k<SUB>10</SUB> according to total weight, lean body mass (LBM), and height. In plasma targeting mode, the small, fixed V1 results in very small initial doses on starting the system or on increasing the target concentration in comparison with the Marsh model. The Schnider model should thus always be used in effect-site targeting mode, in which larger initial doses are administered, albeit still smaller than for the Marsh model. Users of the Schnider model should be aware that in the morbidly obese the LBM equation can generate paradoxical values resulting in excessive increases in maintenance infusion rates. Finally, the two currently available open TCI systems implement different methods of effect-site targeting for the Schnider model, and in a small subset of patients the induction doses generated by the two methods can differ significantly.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Absalom, A. R., Mani, V., De Smet, T., Struys, M. M. R. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep143</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmacokinetic models for propofol--defining and illuminating the devil in the detail]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>37</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/38?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Simultaneous targeting of multiple opioid receptors: a strategy to improve side-effect profile]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/38?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Opioid receptors are currently classified as &micro; (mu: mOP),  (delta: dOP),  (kappa: kOP) with a fourth related non-classical opioid receptor for nociceptin/orphainin FQ, NOP. Morphine is the current gold standard analgesic acting at MOP receptors but produces a range of variably troublesome side-effects, in particular tolerance. There is now good laboratory evidence to suggest that blocking DOP while activating MOP produces analgesia (or antinociception) without the development of tolerance. Simultaneous targeting of MOP and DOP can be accomplished by: (i) co-administering two selective drugs, (ii) administering one non-selective drug, or (iii) designing a single drug that specifically targets both receptors; a bivalent ligand. Bivalent ligands generally contain two active centres or pharmacophores that are variably separated by a chemical spacer and there are several interesting examples in the literature. For example linking the MOP agonist oxymorphone to the DOP antagonist naltrindole produces a MOP/DOP bivalent ligand that should produce analgesia with reduced tolerance. The type of response/selectivity produced depends on the pharmacophore combination (e.g. oxymorphone and naltrindole as above) and the space between them. Production and evaluation of bivalent ligands is an emerging field in drug design and for anaesthesia, analgesics that are designed not to be highly selective morphine-like (MOP) ligands represents a new avenue for the production of useful drugs for chronic (and in particular cancer) pain.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dietis, N., Guerrini, R., Calo, G., Salvadori, S., Rowbotham, D. J., Lambert, D. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep129</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Simultaneous targeting of multiple opioid receptors: a strategy to improve side-effect profile]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>49</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>38</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/50?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What makes a molecule an anaesthetic? Studies on the mechanisms of anaesthesia using a physicochemical approach]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/50?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Recent studies of mechanisms of anaesthesia have been mainly &lsquo;target orientated&rsquo;, investigating the activity of both volatile and i.v. agents at putative sites of action. An alternative approach is one that is &lsquo;ligand orientated&rsquo;, focusing on the properties of molecules that define their immobilizing ability and secondly define their potency. The use of conventional descriptors (such as non-polar solubility or the octanol&ndash;water partition coefficient [Log <I>P</I>]) are limited in their utility as predictors of potency as they represent three-dimensional molecular properties as a one-dimensional parameter. Using different computer-based molecular modelling methods (molecular similarity studies and comparative molecular field analysis [CoMFA]), we have identified the molecular bases of the activity of structurally diverse anaesthetics, such that they can be described as a single model based on the spatial distribution of molecular bulk and electrostatic potential. The same approach can also be used to model other properties of anaesthetic agents, such as cardiovascular depression. The present data suggest that, for the i.v. agents, it may be difficult to separate immobilizing (anaesthetic) activity and cardiovascular depression within a single molecule.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sear, J. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep092</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What makes a molecule an anaesthetic? Studies on the mechanisms of anaesthesia using a physicochemical approach]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>60</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>50</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/61?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sodium channels and the synaptic mechanisms of inhaled anaesthetics]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/61?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>General anaesthetics act in an agent-specific manner on synaptic transmission in the central nervous system by enhancing inhibitory transmission and reducing excitatory transmission. The synaptic mechanisms of general anaesthetics involve both presynaptic effects on transmitter release and postsynaptic effects on receptor function. The halogenated volatile anaesthetics inhibit neuronal voltage-gated Na<sup>+</sup> channels at clinical concentrations. Reductions in neurotransmitter release by volatile anaesthetics involve inhibition of presynaptic action potentials as a result of Na<sup>+</sup> channel blockade. Although voltage-gated ion channels have been assumed to be insensitive to general anaesthetics, it is now evident that clinical concentrations of volatile anaesthetics inhibit Na<sup>+</sup> channels in isolated rat nerve terminals and neurons, as well as heterologously expressed mammalian Na<sup>+</sup> channel  subunits. Voltage-gated Na<sup>+</sup> channels have emerged as promising targets for some of the effects of the inhaled anaesthetics. Knowledge of the synaptic mechanisms of general anaesthetics is essential for optimization of anaesthetic techniques for advanced surgical procedures and for the development of improved anaesthetics.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hemmings, H. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep144</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sodium channels and the synaptic mechanisms of inhaled anaesthetics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>69</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>61</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/70?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Immunomodulation in the critically ill]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/70?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Immunotherapy in the critically ill is an appealing notion because of the apparent abnormal immune and inflammatory responses seen in so many patients. The administration of a medication that could alter immune responses and decrease mortality in patients with sepsis could represent a &lsquo;magic bullet&rsquo;. Various approaches have been tried over the last 20 yr: steroids; anti-endotoxin or anti-cytokine antibodies; cytokine receptor antagonists; and other agents with immune-modulating side-effects. However, in some respects, research along these lines has been unsuccessful or disappointing at best. The current state of knowledge is summarized with particular reference to sepsis and the acute respiratory distress syndrome.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Webster, N. R., Galley, H. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep128</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Immunomodulation in the critically ill]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>81</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>70</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/82?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmacological optimization of tissue perfusion]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/82?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>After fluid resuscitation, vasoactive drug treatment represents the major cornerstone for correcting any major impairment of the circulation. However, debate still rages as to the choice of agent, dose, timing, targets, and monitoring modalities that should optimally be used to benefit the patient yet, at the same time, minimize harm. This review highlights these areas and some new pharmacological agents that broaden our therapeutic options.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mongardon, N., Dyson, A., Singer, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep135</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmacological optimization of tissue perfusion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>88</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>82</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/89?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anaesthesia and myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/89?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Anaesthetists are confronted on a daily basis with patients with coronary artery disease, myocardial ischaemia, or both during the perioperative period. Therefore, prevention and ultimately adequate therapy of perioperative myocardial ischaemia and its consequences are the major challenges in current anaesthetic practice. This review will focus on the translation of the laboratory evidence of anaesthetic-induced cardioprotection into daily clinical practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frassdorf, J., De Hert, S., Schlack, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep141</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anaesthesia and myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>98</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/99?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Statins for all: the new premed?]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/99?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The use of statins is widespread and many patients presenting for surgery are regularly taking them. There is evidence that statins have beneficial effects beyond those of lipid lowering, including reducing the perioperative risk of cardiac complications and sepsis. This review addresses the cellular mechanisms by which statins may produce these effects. Statins appear to have actions on vascular nitric oxide through the balance of inducible and endothelial nitric oxide synthase. The clinical evidence for these benefits is also briefly reviewed with the objective of clarifying the current status of statin use in the perioperative period. There is reasonably strong evidence that patients already taking statins should continue on them perioperatively. However, the evidence for the prophylactic use of statins perioperatively is weak and lacks prospective controlled studies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brookes, Z. L. S., McGown, C. C., Reilly, C. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep149</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Statins for all: the new premed?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>107</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/108?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Current concepts in neuromuscular transmission]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/108?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is structured and powered to transduce electrical activity from the distal nerve terminal of a motor neurone via the neuromuscular cleft to the post-junctional muscle membrane to ultimately generate muscle contraction. Our understanding of this complex function has expanded over many years, and the NMJ has served as a prototype for how different synapses operate in the peripheral and central nervous systems. The NMJ has a presynaptic part which is synonymous with the distal nerve ending, being responsible for neurotransmitter synthesis, packaging into vesicles, and subsequent vesicle transportation to active release sites where vesicle docking, fusion, and release of acetylcholine and other co-released transmitters finally take place. The synaptic cleft, filled with large molecular complexes that guarantee ultrastructural NMJ arrangement and signal transduction, allows for rapid diffusion and degradation of the neurotransmitter. The postsynaptic part consists of a folded muscle membrane into which nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) directly opposite the presynaptic active release sites are mounted and fixed by a cytoskeleton. This specialized postsynaptic region is closely associated with the perijunctional zone where a high density of sodium channels promote and amplify the signal in order to guarantee the propagation of the electrical activity to generate muscle contraction. The transduction process is maintained at load (i.e. high stimulus frequency) by a presynaptic mechanism allowing for sustained transmitter release over time at high demand. This positive feedback mechanism relies on neuronal nAChRs present on the distal nerve terminal, whereas the continuation of the transduction process at the postsynaptic part relies on the classical muscle type nAChR. In this review, we will focus on recent findings of potential clinical importance that will advance our understanding of the effects of neuromuscular blocking agents and neuromuscular monitoring and also our management of disorders of the neuromuscular system within anaesthesia and intensive care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fagerlund, M. J., Eriksson, L. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep150</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Current concepts in neuromuscular transmission]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>114</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reversal of neuromuscular block]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The use of anticholinesterases to reverse residual neuromuscular block is efficacious only if recovery is already established. It was originally advised that at least the second twitch (T2) of the train-of-four response should be detectable before neostigmine is administered. Even in these circumstances, the full effect of anticholinesterases takes up to 10 min to achieve. Anticholinesterases also have muscarinic side-effects that require an antimuscarinic to be administered concomitantly. An ideal reversal agent could be given at any time after the administration of a neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA), and should have no muscarinic side-effects. The gamma cyclodextrin, sugammadex, has been demonstrated to effectively antagonize even profound block produced by the aminosteroid NMBAs, rocuronium and vecuronium, by chelating them. The complex is then excreted in the urine. Sugammadex is ineffective in antagonizing the benzylisoquinolinium NMBAs. The dose should be adjusted according to the degree of residual block: sugammadex 16 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> for immediate reversal; 4&ndash;8 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> for antagonizing profound block (post-tetanic count 1&ndash;2); and 2 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> to antagonize moderate block (when T2 is detectable). As yet, the extent of any side-effects that may occur with this new antagonist is not fully known, although rarely adverse cardiovascular effects (hypotension, hypertension, prolonged QT interval) have already been reported.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Srivastava, A., Hunter, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep093</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reversal of neuromuscular block]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>129</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/130?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Major complications of central neuraxial block: the Third National Audit Project: some comments and questions]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/130?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moen, V., Irestedt, L., Dahlgren, N., Cook, T. M., Counsell, D., Wildsmith, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep151</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Major complications of central neuraxial block: the Third National Audit Project: some comments and questions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>132</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>130</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/133?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bupivacaine chondrotoxicity]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/133?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[White, S. M., Turner, R., McNaught, A. F., McCartney, C., Webb, S. T., Ghosh, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep152</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bupivacaine chondrotoxicity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>134</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>133</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/134?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bispectral index sensor as a possible cause of postoperative visual loss after frontal craniotomy]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/134?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yamashita, S., Takahashi, H., Tanaka, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep153</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bispectral index sensor as a possible cause of postoperative visual loss after frontal craniotomy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>134</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>134</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/134-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Video laryngoscopy and external laryngeal manipulation]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/134-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmad, I., Ong, C., Parameswaran, V. V., Groeben, H., Jungbauer, A., Schumann, M., Brunkhorst, V., Borgers, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep154</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Video laryngoscopy and external laryngeal manipulation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>135</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>134</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/135?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response entropy-state entropy difference and nociception: a matter of context]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/135?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathews, D. M., Aho, A. J., Yli-Hankala, A., Lyytikainen, L.-P., Jantti, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep155</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response entropy-state entropy difference and nociception: a matter of context]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>137</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>135</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/137?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diagnosis of vertebral canal haematoma by myelography and spiral computer tomography in a patient with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator contraindicating magnetic resonance imaging]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/137?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boye, S., Schumacher, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep156</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diagnosis of vertebral canal haematoma by myelography and spiral computer tomography in a patient with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator contraindicating magnetic resonance imaging]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>138</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>137</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/138?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidental recognition of an aspirated tablet in an oesophagectomized patient]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/138?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Braun, S., Werdehausen, R., Bothur, T., Hermanns, H., Lipfert, P., Stevens, M. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep157</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidental recognition of an aspirated tablet in an oesophagectomized patient]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>139</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>138</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/139?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Familial Mediterranean fever abdominal pain during spinal anaesthesia]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/139?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sert, H., Muslu, B., Usta, B., Gozdemir, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep158</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Familial Mediterranean fever abdominal pain during spinal anaesthesia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>139</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>139</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/140?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Practical Approach to Pediatric Anesthesia]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/140?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barker, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep111</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Practical Approach to Pediatric Anesthesia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>140</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/140-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stewart's Textbook of Acid-Base]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/140-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soni, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep145</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stewart's Textbook of Acid-Base]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>141</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/141?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Pain Management--Practice and Procedures]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/141?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chambers, W. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep146</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Pain Management--Practice and Procedures]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>142</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>141</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/142?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ultrasound in Anesthetic Practice]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/142?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dowling, M., Bedforth, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep147</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ultrasound in Anesthetic Practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>143</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>142</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/143?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Anesthesia--Near Misses and Lessons Learned]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/1/143?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sirian, R., Hardman, J. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep148</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Anesthesia--Near Misses and Lessons Learned]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>143</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>143</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/NP?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In the June 2009 BJA ...]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/NP?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep132</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In the June 2009 BJA ...]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>In This Issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/729?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Spinal anaesthesia: a century of refinement, and failure is still an option]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/729?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drasner, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep085</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Spinal anaesthesia: a century of refinement, and failure is still an option]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>730</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>729</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/731?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perioperative echocardiography for non-cardiac surgery: what is its role in routine haemodynamic monitoring?]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/731?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ng, A., Swanevelder, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep100</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perioperative echocardiography for non-cardiac surgery: what is its role in routine haemodynamic monitoring?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>734</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>731</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/734?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[New airway equipment: opportunities for enhanced safety]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/734?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin, F., Buggy, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep104</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[New airway equipment: opportunities for enhanced safety]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>738</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>734</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/739?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Failed spinal anaesthesia: mechanisms, management, and prevention]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/739?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Although spinal (subarachnoid or intrathecal) anaesthesia is generally regarded as one of the most reliable types of regional block methods, the possibility of failure has long been recognized. Dealing with a spinal anaesthetic which is in some way inadequate can be very difficult; so, the technique must be performed in a way which minimizes the risk of regional block. Thus, practitioners must be aware of all the possible mechanisms of failure so that, where possible, these mechanisms can be avoided. This review has considered the mechanisms in a sequential way: problems with lumbar puncture; errors in the preparation and injection of solutions; inadequate spreading of drugs through cerebrospinal fluid; failure of drug action on nervous tissue; and difficulties more related to patient management than the actual block. Techniques for minimizing the possibility of failure are discussed, all of them requiring, in essence, close attention to detail. Options for managing an inadequate block include repeating the injection, manipulation of the patient&rsquo;s posture to encourage wider spread of the injected solution, supplementation with local anaesthetic infiltration by the surgeon, use of systemic sedation or analgesic drugs, and recourse to general anaesthesia. Follow-up procedures must include full documentation of what happened, the provision of an explanation to the patient and, if indicated by events, detailed investigation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fettes, P. D. W., Jansson, J.-R., Wildsmith, J. A. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep096</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Failed spinal anaesthesia: mechanisms, management, and prevention]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>748</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>739</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/749?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Postoperative renal dysfunction and preoperative left ventricular dysfunction predispose patients to increased long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/749?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Both preoperative left ventricular dysfunction and postoperative renal function deterioration are associated with increased long-term mortality after cardiac surgery. The influence of preoperative left ventricular dysfunction on postoperative renal dysfunction and long-term mortality is not defined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We collected data from 641 consecutive patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in 1991 at our institution. Prospective follow-up was through to July 2004.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In-hospital mortality was 2.7% (17 of 641). During follow-up, 248 (40%) patients discharged alive died (5 and 10 yr survival 90% and 70%, respectively). On univariate analysis, preoperative left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction &lt;50%) and an increase in serum creatinine &ge;25% in the first postoperative week were associated with long-term mortality. The associated mortality risk was additive in predominantly non-overlapping patients groups: the hazard ratio (HR) for renal function deterioration only was 1.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95&ndash;2.32, <I>P</I>=0.083; <I>n</I>=64] and for left ventricular dysfunction only 1.71 (95% CI 1.26&ndash;2.95, <I>P</I>=0.0026; <I>n</I>=73). In patients in whom both were present, HR was 3.23 (95% CI 2.52&ndash;20.28, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001; <I>n</I>=20). Although postoperative renal dysfunction was associated with left ventricular dysfunction (<I>P</I>=0.008), both left ventricular dysfunction and postoperative renal function deterioration were independently associated with long-term mortality on multivariate analysis, as were age and the use of venous conduits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Both postoperative renal function deterioration and preoperative left ventricular dysfunction independently identify largely non-overlapping groups of patients with increased long-term mortality after coronary bypass surgery. In the group of patients with both factors present, the mortality risks appear additive.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loef, B. G., Epema, A. H., Navis, G., Ebels, T., Stegeman, C. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep088</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Postoperative renal dysfunction and preoperative left ventricular dysfunction predispose patients to increased long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>755</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>749</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/756?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Orthostatic intolerance and the cardiovascular response to early postoperative mobilization]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/756?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>A key element in enhanced postoperative recovery is early mobilization which, however, may be hindered by orthostatic intolerance, that is, an inability to sit or stand because of symptoms of cerebral hypoperfusion as intolerable dizziness, nausea and vomiting, feeling of heat, or blurred vision. We assessed orthostatic tolerance in relation to the postural cardiovascular responses before and shortly after open radical prostatectomy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Orthostatic tolerance and the cardiovascular response to sitting and standing were evaluated on the day before surgery and 6 and 22 h after operation in 16 patients. Non-invasive systolic (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) (Finometer&reg;), heart rate, cardiac output (CO, Modelflow&reg;), total peripheral resistance (TPR), and central venous oxygen saturation (<I>S</I>cv<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>) were monitored.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Before surgery, no patients had symptoms of orthostatic intolerance. In contrast, 8 (50%) and 2 (12%) patients were orthostatic intolerant at 6 and ~22 h after surgery, respectively. Before surgery, SAP, DAP, and TPR increased (<I>P</I>&lt;0.05), whereas CO did not change (<I>P</I>&gt;0.05) and <I>S</I>cv<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB> decreased (<I>P</I>&lt;0.05) upon mobilization. At 6 h after operation, SAP and DAP declined with mobilization (<I>P</I>&lt;0.05) and the arterial pressure response differed from the preoperative response both upon sitting (<I>P</I>&lt;0.05) and standing (<I>P</I>&lt;0.05) due to both impaired TPR and CO. At ~22 h, the SAP and DAP responses to mobilization did not differ from the preoperative evaluation (<I>P</I>&gt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The early postoperative postural cardiovascular response is impaired after radical prostatectomy with a risk of orthostatic intolerance, limiting early postoperative mobilization. The pathogenic mechanisms include both impaired TPR and CO responses.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bundgaard-Nielsen, M., Jorgensen, C. C., Jorgensen, T. B., Ruhnau, B., Secher, N. H., Kehlet, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep083</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Orthostatic intolerance and the cardiovascular response to early postoperative mobilization]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>762</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>756</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/763?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/763?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is usually performed by landmark-based methods. This prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study was designed to describe a method of ultrasound-guided TAP block and to evaluate the intra- and postoperative analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia with or without TAP block.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Forty-two patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to receive standard general anaesthetic either with (Group A, <I>n</I>=21) or without TAP block (Group B, <I>n</I>=21). Ultrasound-guided bilateral TAP block was performed with a high frequent linear ultrasound probe and an in-plane needle guidance technique with 15 ml bupivacaine 5 mg ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup> on each side. Intraoperative use of sufentanil and postoperative demand of morphine using a patient-controlled analgesia device were recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Ultrasonographic visualization of the relevant anatomy, detection of the shaft and tip of the needle, and the spread of local anaesthetic were possible in all cases where a TAP block was performed. Patients in Group A received significantly more intraoperative sufentanil and postoperative morphine compared with those in Group B [mean (<scp>sd</scp>) 8.6 (3.5) <I>vs</I> 23.0 (4.8) &micro;g, <I>P</I>&lt;0.01, and 10.5 (7.7) <I>vs</I> 22.8 (4.3) mg, <I>P</I>&lt;0.05].</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Ultrasonographic guidance enables exact placement of the local anaesthetic for TAP blocks. In patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under standard general anaesthetic, ultrasound-guided TAP block substantially reduced the perioperative opioid consumption.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[El-Dawlatly, A. A., Turkistani, A., Kettner, S. C., Machata, A.-M., Delvi, M. B., Thallaj, A., Kapral, S., Marhofer, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep067</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>767</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>763</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/768?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Motivational influences on anaesthetists' use of practice guidelines]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/768?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>With the proliferation of practice guidelines in anaesthesia comes the possibility that anaesthetists may, during the course of their work, commit &lsquo;violations&rsquo; (actions that are not intended to cause harm to patients, but that deviate from guidelines). These may have a long-term impact on patient safety, and so there is a need to understand what makes anaesthetists decide to follow or deviate from guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A questionnaire on the use of guidelines was completed by 629 College Fellows. This presented three anaesthetic scenarios, each of which involved a deviation from a guideline, and asked respondents to rate their beliefs about the likely outcome of the violation, the level of social approval they would have for violating, the amount of control they would have over violating, and the practice of their peers with regard to violating.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In all three scenarios, beliefs about the outcome of violating and the amount of control over violating predicted respondents&rsquo; self-reported likelihood that they would commit the violation. In two scenarios, beliefs about the practice of peers predicted violating. Level of social approval predicted violating in one scenario only.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Anaesthetists&rsquo; decisions to follow or deviate from guidelines are influenced by the beliefs they hold about the consequences of their actions, the direct or indirect influence of others, and the presence of factors that encourage or facilitate particular courses of action.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phipps, D. L., Beatty, P. C. W., Parker, D., Nsoedo, C., Meakin, G. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep082</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Motivational influences on anaesthetists' use of practice guidelines]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>774</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>768</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/775?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Targeting smooth emergence: the effect site concentration of remifentanil for preventing cough during emergence during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia for thyroid surgery]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/775?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The administration of short-acting opioids can be a reliable and safe method to prevent coughing during emergence from anaesthesia but the proper dose or effect site concentration of remifentanil for this purpose has not been reported. We therefore investigated the effect site concentration (Ce) of remifentanil for preventing cough during emergence from anaesthesia with propofol&ndash;remifentanil target-controlled infusion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Twenty-three ASA I&ndash;II grade female patients, aged 23&ndash;66 yr undergoing elective thyroidectomy were enrolled in this study. EC<SUB>50</SUB> and EC<SUB>95</SUB> of remifentanil for preventing cough were determined using Dixon's up-and-down method and probit analysis. Propofol effect site concentration at extubation, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate (HR) were compared in patients with smooth emergence and without smooth emergence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three out of 11 patients with remifentanil Ce of 1.5 ng ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup> and all seven patients with Ce of 2.0 ng ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup> did not cough during emergence; the EC<SUB>50</SUB> of remifentanil that suppressed coughing was 1.46 ng ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup> by Dixon's up-and-down method, and EC<SUB>95</SUB> was 2.14 ng ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup> by probit analysis. Effect site concentration of propofol at awakening was similar in patients with a smooth emergence and those without smooth emergence, but HR and arterial pressure were higher in those who coughed during emergence. Clinically significant hypoventilation was not seen in any patient.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We found that the EC<SUB>95</SUB> of effect site concentration of remifentanil to suppress coughing at emergence from anaesthesia was 2.14 ng ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>. Maintaining an established Ce of remifentanil is a reliable method of abolishing cough and thereby targeting smooth emergence from anaesthesia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, B., Lee, J.-R., Na, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep090</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Targeting smooth emergence: the effect site concentration of remifentanil for preventing cough during emergence during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia for thyroid surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>778</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>775</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/779?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Value of a single preoperative PFA-100(R) measurement in assessing the risk of bleeding in patients taking cyclooxygenase inhibitors and undergoing total knee replacement]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/779?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The usefulness of the PFA-100<sup>&reg;</sup> in assessing the risk of bleeding in non-cardiac surgery is not clear. This study aims to examine this by correlating preoperative PFA-100<sup>&reg;</sup> measurement with perioperative bleeding in patients receiving cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>PFA-100<sup>&reg;</sup> with adenosine-5'-diphosphate (ADPCT) and epinephrine (EPICT) cartridges were measured before operation in consecutive patients undergoing elective total knee replacement and taking different COX inhibitors. Surgery and anaesthesia were performed by the same team using standardized techniques. Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drain output were recorded by anaesthetists and nurses blinded to the PFA-100<sup>&reg;</sup> measurements. Surgeons, similarly blinded, were asked to rate the quality of haemostasis. Correlation was sought between these data and PFA-100<sup>&reg;</sup> measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Thirty patients were studied, involving 51 knees. Preoperative PFA-100<sup>&reg;</sup> EPICT was correlated with drain output (<I>r</I>=0.30, <I>P</I>=0.03). The correlation becomes stronger when a 20% <I>in vitro</I> haemodiluted sample was used for measurement (<I>r</I>=0.42, <I>P</I>=0.01). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis using the diluted measurements [area under curve (AUC) 0.74 (95% CI 0.54&ndash;0.94)] suggested using a cut-off value of 188 s for EPICT, which will predict excessive drain output with 89% sensitivity, 54% specificity, and a likelihood ratio of 1.93. Diluted EPICT was also correlated with surgeon rating of haemostasis (<I>r</I>=0.36, <I>P</I>=0.04) although none of the measurements correlated with intraoperative blood loss.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Preoperative PFA-100<sup>&reg;</sup> prolongation is correlated with increased postoperative drain output. It can be a potentially useful preoperative measurement in patients taking COX inhibitors.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ng, K. F. J., Lawmin, J.-C., Tsang, S. F., Tang, W. M., Chiu, K. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Value of a single preoperative PFA-100(R) measurement in assessing the risk of bleeding in patients taking cyclooxygenase inhibitors and undergoing total knee replacement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>784</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>779</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/785?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bleeding management with fibrinogen concentrate targeting a high-normal plasma fibrinogen level: a pilot study]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/785?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Bleeding diathesis after aortic valve operation and ascending aorta replacement (AV&ndash;AA) is managed with fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet concentrates. The aim was to compare haemostatic effects of conventional transfusion management and FIBTEM (thromboelastometry test)-guided fibrinogen concentrate administration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A blood products transfusion algorithm was developed using retrospective data from 42 elective patients (Group A). Two units of platelet concentrate were transfused after cardiopulmonary bypass, followed by 4 u of FFP if bleeding persisted, if platelet count was &le;100<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>3</sup> &micro;l<sup>&ndash;1</sup> when removing the aortic clamp, and <I>vice versa</I> if platelet count was &gt;100<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>3</sup> &micro;l<sup>&ndash;1</sup>. The trigger for each therapy step was &ge;60 g blood absorbed from the mediastinal wound area by dry swabs in 5 min. Assignment to two prospective groups was neither randomized nor blinded; Group B (<I>n</I>=5) was treated according to the algorithm, Group C (<I>n</I>=10) received fibrinogen concentrate (Haemocomplettan<sup>&reg;</sup> P/Riastap, CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany) before the algorithm-based therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A mean of 5.7 (0.7) g fibrinogen concentrate decreased blood loss to below the transfusion trigger level in all Group C patients. Group C had reduced transfusion [mean 0.7 (range 0&ndash;4) u <I>vs</I> 8.5 (5.3) in Group A and 8.2 (2.3) in Group B] and reduced postoperative bleeding [366 (199) ml <I>vs</I> 793 (560) in Group A and 716 (219) in Group B].</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this pilot study, FIBTEM-guided fibrinogen concentrate administration was associated with reduced transfusion requirements and 24 h postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing AV&ndash;AA.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rahe-Meyer, N., Pichlmaier, M., Haverich, A., Solomon, C., Winterhalter, M., Piepenbrock, S., Tanaka, K. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep089</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bleeding management with fibrinogen concentrate targeting a high-normal plasma fibrinogen level: a pilot study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>792</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>785</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Critical Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/793?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Finding the optimal concentration range for fibrinogen replacement after severe haemodilution: an in vitro model]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/793?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Replacement of fibrinogen is presumably the key step in managing dilutional coagulopathy. We performed an <I>in vitro</I> study hypothesizing that there is a minimal fibrinogen concentration in diluted whole blood above which the rate of clot formation approaches normal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Blood samples from six healthy volunteers were diluted 1:5 v/v with saline keeping haematocrit at 24% using red cell concentrates. We measured coagulation factors and thrombin generation in plasma at baseline and after dilution. Thromboelastometry was used to evaluate (i) speed and quality of clot formation in diluted samples supplemented with fibrinogen 50&ndash;300 mg dl<sup>&ndash;1</sup> and (ii) clot resistance to fibrinolysis. Diluted and undiluted samples with no added fibrinogen served as controls.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Coagulation parameters and platelets were reduced by 74&ndash;85% after dilution. Peak thrombin generation was reduced by 56%. Adding fibrinogen led to a concentration-dependent improvement of all thromboelastometric parameters. The half maximal effective concentration (EC50) for fibrinogen replacement in haemodiluted blood was calculated to be 125 mg dl<sup>&ndash;1</sup>. Adding tissue plasminogen activator, 0.15 &micro;g ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, led to a decrease of clot firmness and lysis time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The target plasma concentration for fibrinogen replacement was predicted by these <I>in vitro</I> results to be greater than 200 mg dl<sup>&ndash;1</sup> as only these concentrations optimized the rate of clot formation. This concentration is twice the level suggested by the current transfusion guidelines. Although improved, clots were prone to fibrinolysis indicating that the efficacy of fibrinogen therapy may be influenced by co-existing fibrinolytic tendency occurring during dilutional coagulopathy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bolliger, D., Szlam, F., Molinaro, R. J., Rahe-Meyer, N., Levy, J. H., Tanaka, K. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep098</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Finding the optimal concentration range for fibrinogen replacement after severe haemodilution: an in vitro model]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>799</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>793</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Critical Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/800?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is cerebral oxygenation negatively affected by infusion of norepinephrine in healthy subjects?]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/800?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Vasopressor agents are commonly used to increase mean arterial pressure (MAP) in order to secure a pressure gradient to perfuse vital organs. The influence of norepinephrine on cerebral oxygenation is not clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the infusion of norepinephrine on cerebral oxygenation in healthy subjects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Three doses of norepinephrine (0.05, 0.1, and 0.15 &micro;g kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> for 20 min each) were infused in nine healthy subjects [six males; 26 (6) yr, mean (<scp>sd</scp>)]. MAP, cerebral oxygenation characterized by frontal lobe oxygenation (<I>S</I>c<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>) and internal jugular venous oxygen saturation (<I>S</I>jv<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>), middle cerebral artery mean flow velocity (MCA Vmean), cardiac output (CO), and arterial partial pressure for carbon dioxide (<I>P</I>a<SUB><scp>co</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>) were evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>MAP increased from 88 (79&ndash;101) [median (range)] to 115 (98&ndash;128) mm Hg with increasing doses of norepinephrine (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05), reflecting an increase in total peripheral resistance [20.3 (12.2&ndash;25.8) to 25.2 (16.4&ndash;28.5) mm Hg min litre<sup>&ndash;1</sup>; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.05] since CO remained at baseline values. <I>S</I>c<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB> and <I>S</I>jv<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB> decreased with increasing doses of norepinephrine, reaching statistical significance with norepinephrine infused at 0.1 &micro;g kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> [<I>S</I>c<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>: 78 (75&ndash;94) to 69 (61&ndash;83)%; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.05; <I>S</I>jv<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>: 67 (8) to 64 (7)%; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01]. MCA Vmean was reduced with each dose of norepinephrine [56.9 (11.2) to 55.0 (11.7) cm s<sup>&ndash;1</sup>; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.05] and <I>P</I>a<SUB><scp>co</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB> lowered from 5.4 (0.4) to 5.1 (0.4) kPa (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study suggests that infusion of norepinephrine at 0.1 &micro;g kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> or higher may negatively affect cerebral oxygenation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brassard, P., Seifert, T., Secher, N. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep065</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is cerebral oxygenation negatively affected by infusion of norepinephrine in healthy subjects?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>805</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>800</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Neurosciences And Neuroanaesthesia</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/806?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of i.v. phenylephrine or ephedrine on the ED50 of intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl for Caesarean section]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/806?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Prophylactic infusion of phenylephrine to prevent hypotension at Caesarean section has been shown to decrease the rostral spread of intrathecal plain levobupivacaine and intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine by a median of two dermatomes compared with ephedrine. The aim of this study was to determine the median effective dose (ED50) of intrathecal bupivacaine required to achieve a block to touch at the xiphisternum in patients undergoing Caesarean section when phenylephrine or ephedrine are used to prevent hypotension.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Seventy women were randomized in two groups to receive either phenylephrine at a rate of 16.6 &micro;g min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> (concentration 1&micro;g ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>) or ephedrine at a rate of 1.5 mg min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> (concentration 90 &micro;g ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>). Patients received varying doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl 25 &micro;g using a double-blinded, up-down sequential allocation design. Effective doses were defined as anaesthesia to touch with ethyl chloride spray to the xiphisternum within 20 min.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The ED50 estimates of bupivacaine were similar in the two groups: 7.8 mg [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.7&ndash;8.9] with phenylephrine and 7.6 mg (95% CI 6.8&ndash;8.4) with ephedrine. Systolic blood pressure control was similar (<I>P</I>=0.18) with vasopressors but heart rate was higher with ephedrine (<I>P</I>=0.0014).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Under the conditions of this study, we have shown that when phenylephrine or ephedrine were used to prevent post-spinal hypotension, the dosing requirement of hyperbaric bupivacaine was similar for intrathecal anaesthesia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hennebry, M. C., Stocks, G. M., Belavadi, P., Barnes, J., Wray, S., Columb, M. O., Lyons, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep095</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of i.v. phenylephrine or ephedrine on the ED50 of intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl for Caesarean section]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>811</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>806</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Obstetrics</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/812?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of remifentanil on cardiovascular and bispectral index responses to endotracheal intubation in severe pre-eclamptic patients undergoing Caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/812?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>We examined the effects of remifentanil on cardiovascular and bispectral index (BIS) responses to tracheal intubation and neonatal outcomes in pre-eclamptic patients undergoing Caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Forty-two women with severe pre-eclampsia were randomly assigned to receive either remifentanil 1 &micro;g kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> (<I>n</I>=21) or saline (<I>n</I>=21) over 30 s before induction of anaesthesia using thiopentone 4 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> and suxamethonium 1.5 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup>. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and BIS values as well as plasma catecholamine concentrations were measured. Neonatal effects were assessed using Apgar scores and umbilical cord blood gas analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Induction with thiopentone caused a reduction in MAP and BIS in both remifentanil and control groups. Following the tracheal intubation MAP and HR increased in both groups, the magnitude of which was lower in the remifentanil group. BIS values also increased, of which magnitude did not differ between the groups. Norepinephrine concentrations increased significantly following the intubation in the control, while remained unaltered in the remifentanil group. The neonatal Apgar scores at 1 min were significantly lower in the remifentanil group than in the control. However, Apgar scores at 5 min, and umbilical artery and vein blood gas values were similar between the groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These results suggest that a single bolus of 1 &micro;g kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> remifentanil effectively attenuates haemodynamic but not BIS responses to tracheal intubation in pre-eclamptic patients undergoing Caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia. However, its use was associated with maternal hypotension and neonatal respiratory depression requiring resuscitation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoo, K. Y., Jeong, C. W., Park, B. Y., Kim, S. J., Jeong, S. T., Shin, M. H., Lee, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep099</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of remifentanil on cardiovascular and bispectral index responses to endotracheal intubation in severe pre-eclamptic patients undergoing Caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>819</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>812</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Obstetrics</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/820?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Practical anatomic landmarks for determining the insertion depth of central venous catheter in paediatric patients]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/820?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Various methods have been recommended to decide a proper insertion depth of central venous catheter (CVC). The carina is recommended as a useful target level for the CVC tip position. We evaluated the sternal head of a right clavicle and the nipples as anatomic landmarks for determining the optimal depth of CVC in paediatric patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Ninety children, &lt;5 yr, undergoing catheterization through the right internal jugular vein were enrolled. The insertion depth was determined as follows. The insertion point was designated as &lsquo;Point I&rsquo;. The sternal head of the right clavicle was called &lsquo;Point A&rsquo; and the midpoint of the perpendicular line drawn from Point A to the line connecting both nipples was called &lsquo;Point B&rsquo;. The insertion depth of CVC was determined by adding the two distances (from I to A and from A to B) and subtracting 0.5 cm from this. A chest radiography was taken and the distance of the CVC tip from the carina level was measured by the Picture Archiving and Communicating System.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The mean distance of the CVC tip from the carina level was 0.1 (1.0) (<I>P</I>=0.293) cm above the carina (95% CI 0.1 cm below the carina&ndash;0.3 cm above the carina). There was no specific relationship between the distance of the CVC tip from the carina level and the patients&rsquo; age, height, and weight.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The CVC tip could be placed near the carina by using the external landmarks without any formulae, images, and devices in children in our study.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Na, H. S., Kim, J. T., Kim, H. S., Bahk, J. H., Kim, C. S., Kim, S. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep078</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Practical anatomic landmarks for determining the insertion depth of central venous catheter in paediatric patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>823</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>820</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/824?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Challenge of improving postoperative pain management: case studies of three acute pain services in the UK National Health Service]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/824?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Previous national survey research has shown significant deficits in routine postoperative pain management in the UK. This study used an organizational change perspective to explore in detail the organizational challenges faced by three acute pain services in improving postoperative pain management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Case studies were conducted comprising documentary review and semi-structured interviews (71) with anaesthetists, surgeons, nurses, other health professionals, and managers working in and around three broadly typical acute pain services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Although the precise details differed to some degree, the three acute pain services all faced the same broad range of inter-related challenges identified in the organizational change literature (i.e. structural, political, cultural, educational, emotional, and physical/technological challenges). The services were largely isolated from wider organizational objectives and activities and struggled to engage other health professionals in improving postoperative pain management against a background of limited resources, turbulent organizational change, and inter- and intra-professional politics. Despite considerable efforts they struggled to address these challenges effectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The literature on organizational change and quality improvement in health care suggests that it is only by addressing the multiple challenges in a comprehensive way across all levels of the organization and health-care system that sustained improvements in patient care can be secured. This helps to explain why the hard work and commitment of acute pain services over the years have not always resulted in significant improvements in routine postoperative pain management for all surgical patients. Using this literature and adopting a whole-organization quality improvement approach tailored to local circumstances may produce a step-change in the quality of routine postoperative pain management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Powell, A. E., Davies, H. T. O., Bannister, J., Macrae, W. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Challenge of improving postoperative pain management: case studies of three acute pain services in the UK National Health Service]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>831</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>824</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Pain</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/832?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bupivacaine concentrations in the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid of patients during spinal anaesthesia]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/832?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Data on bupivacaine concentrations in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) during spinal anaesthesia are scarce. The purpose of this study was to determine the concentration of bupivacaine in the lumbar CSF of patients with an adequate level of spinal anaesthesia after injection of plain bupivacaine 0.5%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Sixty patients with an adequate level of spinal block after standardized administration of plain bupivacaine 20 mg in men and of 17.5 mg in women were studied. To measure the CSF bupivacaine concentration, we performed a second lumbar spinal puncture and obtained a CSF sample at a randomized time point 5&ndash;45 min after the bupivacaine injection. In addition, we calculated the half-life of bupivacaine in the CSF and tested the hypothesis that the level of spinal block is related to the lumbar CSF bupivacaine concentration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Men and women had CSF bupivacaine concentrations ranging from 95.4 to 773.0 &micro;g ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup> (median 242.4 &micro;g ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>) and from 25.9 to 781.0 &micro;g ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup> (median 187.6 &micro;g ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>), respectively. The large variability of bupivacaine concentrations obtained at similar times after subarachnoid administration made calculation of a meaningful half-life of bupivacaine in CSF impossible. There was no association between CSF bupivacaine concentration and spinal block level, and CSF bupivacaine concentrations for the same spinal block level differed between patients by six-fold.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>There is a large variability of CSF bupivacaine concentrations in patients with an adequate level of spinal anaesthesia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruppen, W., Steiner, L. A., Drewe, J., Hauenstein, L., Brugger, S., Seeberger, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep049</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bupivacaine concentrations in the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid of patients during spinal anaesthesia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>838</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>832</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regional Anaesthesia</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/839?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bupivacaine concentrations in lumbar cerebrospinal fluid in patients with failed spinal anaesthesia]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/839?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Spinal anaesthesia (SA) has high success rates. However, inadequate block after SA has been reported even in the absence of technical problems. Various mechanisms for failed SA (FSA) have been proposed, but reports of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of local anaesthetics (LA) after FSA are scarce. We report lumbar CSF concentrations of bupivacaine in 20 patients in whom adequate block after subarachnoid injection failed to develop.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>All patients with inadequate block after subarachnoid injection of plain bupivacaine 0.5% and in whom a second subarachnoid injection of LA was to be performed as a rescue technique were eligible for entry into this study. A CSF sample was withdrawn immediately before injection of the second dose of LA. Patients in whom failure was obviously due to technical problems or inadequate dosage were excluded. Bupivacaine concentrations were assessed with high-performance liquid chromatography.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>During the study period of 15 months, 2600 spinal anaesthetics were performed. The failure rate was 2.7% (71 patients). In 20 patients (0.77%), CSF concentrations of bupivacaine were determined, which ranged from 3.36 to 1020 &micro;g ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Inadequate CSF concentration of LA is a common reason for FSA. However, in 12 of our 20 patients, concentrations were above 73 &micro;g ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, a concentration that should lead to an adequate block. In these patients, maldistribution of bupivacaine could be responsible for FSA. In view of the absence of sufficient block, despite adequate lumbar CSF concentrations of bupivacaine, concerns about neurotoxicity with repeat injections may be warranted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steiner, L. A., Hauenstein, L., Ruppen, W., Hampl, K. F., Seeberger, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep050</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bupivacaine concentrations in lumbar cerebrospinal fluid in patients with failed spinal anaesthesia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>844</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>839</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regional Anaesthesia</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/845?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/845?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Current methods of locating the epidural space rely on surface anatomical landmarks and loss-of-resistance (LOR). We are not aware of any data describing real-time ultrasound (US)-guided epidural access in adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We evaluated the feasibility of performing real-time US-guided paramedian epidural access with the epidural needle inserted in the plane of the US beam in 15 adults who were undergoing groin or lower limb surgery under an epidural or combined spinal&ndash;epidural anaesthesia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The epidural space was successfully identified in 14 of 15 (93.3%) patients in 1 (1&ndash;3) attempt using the technique described. There was a failure to locate the epidural space in one elderly man. In 8 of 15 (53.3%) patients, studied neuraxial changes, that is, anterior displacement of the posterior dura and widening of the posterior epidural space, were seen immediately after entry of the Tuohy needle and expulsion of the pressurized saline from the LOR syringe into the epidural space at the level of needle insertion. Compression of the thecal sac was also seen in two of these patients. There were no inadvertent dural punctures or complications directly related to the technique described. Anaesthesia adequate for surgery developed in all patients after the initial spinal or epidural injection and recovery from the epidural or spinal anaesthesia was also uneventful.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We have demonstrated the successful use of real-time US guidance in combination with LOR to saline for paramedian epidural access with the epidural needle inserted in the plane of the US beam.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karmakar, M. K., Li, X., Ho, A. M.-H., Kwok, W. H., Chui, P. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep079</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>854</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>845</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regional Anaesthesia</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/855?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intraneural injection during nerve stimulator-guided sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/855?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Exact location of the needle tip during nerve stimulation-guided peripheral nerve blocks is unknown. Using high-frequency ultrasound imaging, we tested the hypothesis that intraneural injection is common with nerve stimulator-guided sciatic nerve (SN) block in popliteal fossa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Forty-two patients scheduled for hallux valgus repair were studied. Sciatic block at the popliteal fossa was accomplished using nerve stimulation. When a motor response was elicited at &lt;0.5 mA (2 Hz, 0.1 ms), 40 ml of local anaesthetic (LA) was injected. Using ultrasound (Titan, Sonosite, 5&ndash;10 MHz), the diameters and area of the SN were measured before and after the injection. The presence of nerve swelling and proximal or distal diffusion of LA were also assessed. Intraneural injection was defined as nerve area (NA) increase of &ge;15% and one or more additional ultrasonographic markers (nerve swelling, proximal&ndash;distal diffusion within epineural tissue). Clinical neurological evaluation was performed 1 week after the block.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Post-injection NA increase &ge;15% was seen in 32 (76%) patients [0.54 (<scp>sd</scp> 0.19) cm<sup>&ndash;2</sup> <I>vs</I> 0.76 (0.24) cm<sup>&ndash;2</sup>; <I>P</I>&lt;0.05]. Nerve swelling with fascicular separation was observed in 37 (88%) patients; proximal and distal diffusion of LA were present in six (14%) and 14 (38%) patients, respectively. Intraneural injection criteria were met in 28 (66%) patients. Greater NA increase was present in patients with fast block onset [61 (45) <I>vs</I> 25 (33)%; (Dif 35% 95% CI 61&ndash;9%); <I>P</I>&lt;0.05]. No patient developed neurological complications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Intraneural (subepineural) injection is a common occurrence after nerve stimulator-guided SN block at the popliteal fossa, yet it may not inevitably lead to neurological complications.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sala Blanch, X., Lopez, A. M., Carazo, J., Hadzic, A., Carrera, A., Pomes, J., Valls-Sole, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep097</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intraneural injection during nerve stimulator-guided sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>861</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>855</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regional Anaesthesia</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/862?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of four intraoperative ventilatory strategies on respiratory compliance and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric banding in obese patients]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/862?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Respiratory function is impaired in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. This study was performed to determine whether repeated lung recruitment combined with PEEP improves respiratory compliance and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (<I>P</I>a<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>) in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric banding.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Sixty patients with BMI &gt;30 kg m<sup>&ndash;2</sup> were randomized, after induction of pneumoperitoneum, to receive either PEEP of 10 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O (Group P), inspiratory pressure of 40 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O for 15 s once (Group R), Group R recruitment followed by PEEP 10 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O (Group RP), or Group RP recruitment but with the inspiratory manoeuvre repeated every 10 min (Group RRP). Static respiratory compliance and <I>P</I>a<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB> were determined after intubation, 10 min after pneumoperitoneum (before lung recruitment), and every 10 min thereafter (after recruitment). Results are presented as mean (<scp>sd</scp>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Pneumoperitoneum decreased respiratory compliance from 48 (3) to 30 (1) ml cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O<sup>&ndash;1</sup> and decreased <I>P</I>a<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB> from 12.4 (0.3) to 8.8 (0.3) kPa in all groups (<I>P</I>&lt;0.01). Immediately after recruitment, compliance was 32 (1), 32 (2), 40 (2), and 40 (1) ml cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O<sup>&ndash;1</sup> and <I>P</I>a<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB> was 9.1 (0.3), 9.1 (0.1), 11.9 (0.1), and 11.9 (0.1) kPa in Groups P, R, RP, and RRP, respectively (<I>P</I>&lt;0.01). Ten and 20 min later, <I>P</I>a<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB> in Group R decreased to 9.2 (0.1) kPa and compliance in Group PR decreased to 33 (2) ml cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, respectively (<I>P</I>&lt;0.01).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Group RRP recruitment strategy was associated with the best intraoperative respiratory compliance and <I>P</I>a<SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB> in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric banding.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Almarakbi, W. A., Fawzi, H. M., Alhashemi, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep084</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of four intraoperative ventilatory strategies on respiratory compliance and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric banding in obese patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>868</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>862</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Respiration And The Airway</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/869?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of the adductor pollicis, orbicularis oculi, and corrugator supercilii as indicators of adequacy of muscle relaxation for tracheal intubation]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/869?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to verify which muscle among the adductor pollicis (AP), orbicularis oculi (OO), and corrugator supercilii (CS) is a better predictor of optimal intubating conditions after administration of rocuronium.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In this prospective trial, 201 patients were randomized into six groups to receive rocuronium at a dose of 0.6 or 1.0 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> during propofol&ndash;remifentanil&ndash;nitrous oxide anaesthesia. The tracheal intubation was performed after maximal neuromuscular block by acceleromyography at the thumb (AP), the eyelid (OO), and the superciliary arch (CS). The onset time, intubating conditions, peak vital signs, and bispectral index were assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The onset time of rocuronium in the OO and CS muscle was significantly shorter than in the AP muscle (<I>P</I>&lt;0.001), but excellent intubating conditions were significantly increased in the AP (87%) and the CS (77%) compared with the OO (32%) after a dose of 0.6 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> of rocuronium (<I>P</I>&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>After administration of rocuronium, twitch monitoring at the OO allows a faster intubation but is associated with an unacceptable incidence of inadequate intubating conditions. Excellent intubating conditions are observed most frequently with AP monitoring but with the longest delay before intubation is attempted. Monitoring of the CS allows intubation earlier than that of AP with fewer patients having excellent but no patients having inadequate intubating conditions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, H. J., Kim, K. S., Jeong, J. S., Cheong, M. A., Shim, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of the adductor pollicis, orbicularis oculi, and corrugator supercilii as indicators of adequacy of muscle relaxation for tracheal intubation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>874</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>869</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Respiration And The Airway</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/875?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing the performance of the Whisperflow(R) continuous positive airway pressure generator: a bench study]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/875?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>There are few data describing the performance of the Whisperflow&reg; continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) generator.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>(i) (a) A static test of 11 Whisperflow devices examining maximum flow generation with no load and with 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, and 20 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O valve loading, at varying <I>F</I><scp>i</scp><SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>. (b) CPAP valves (Accu-peep&reg;, Vital Signs, Totowa, NJ, USA) were tested by measuring mean upstream pressure at varying flows in five valves (2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, and 20 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O). (ii) We measured the mean and minimum inspiratory mask pressure generated by a representative Whisperflow device in a model of spontaneous respiration. Measurements were made with combinations of <I>F</I><scp>i</scp><SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>, ventilatory frequency, tidal volume, and valve loading similar to those encountered in clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>(i) (a) The flow generated by the Whisperflow valves decreases with increasing valve load and increasing <I>F</I><scp>i</scp><SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB> (from 140 to 20 litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup>). (b) The CPAP valves maintain the required pressure within acceptable limits against varying flow. (ii) At all permutations, the mean inspiratory mask pressure was significantly lower than that required. At high inspiratory flow rates, the minimum inspiratory pressure approached atmospheric pressure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The Whisperflow may not perform as expected. Clinicians should be cautious when using this device, particularly with high <I>F</I><scp>i</scp><SUB><scp>o</scp><SUB>2</SUB></SUB> and CPAP valve load. The flow setting should be set at maximum. Failure of CPAP therapy may be due to failure of the generator. Further <I>in vivo</I> data are required.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glover, G. W., Fletcher, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep077</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing the performance of the Whisperflow(R) continuous positive airway pressure generator: a bench study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>881</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>875</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Respiration And The Airway</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/882?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence of severe complications after central neuraxial block]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/882?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fowler, S. J., Cook, T. M., Counsell, D., Wildsmith, J. A. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence of severe complications after central neuraxial block]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>883</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>882</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/883?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical outcome benefits of pretreatment with levosimendan]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/883?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van den Brule, J., Hoedemaekers, C., Pickkers, P., De Santis, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep115</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical outcome benefits of pretreatment with levosimendan]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>884</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>883</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/884?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cough during emergence from anaesthesia]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/884?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramachandran, S. K., Hans, P., Marechal, H., Bonhomme, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep116</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cough during emergence from anaesthesia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>886</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>884</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/886?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality and consistency in microvascular research]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/886?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elbers, P., Atasever, B., Knotzer, H., Maier, S., Hasibeder, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep117</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality and consistency in microvascular research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>887</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>886</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/887?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diastolic dysfunction and off-pump coronary artery bypass]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/887?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edsell, M., Shim, J. K., Choi, Y. S., Kwak, Y. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep118</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diastolic dysfunction and off-pump coronary artery bypass]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>888</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>887</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/888?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preventive closure of a patent foramen ovale before total hip replacement]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/888?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pigot, B., Kirkham, D., Eyrolles, L., Rosencher, N., Safran, D., Cholley, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep119</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preventive closure of a patent foramen ovale before total hip replacement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>889</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>888</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/889?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Low-dose infusion with 'surgical transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block' in open nephrectomy]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/889?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harish, R., Forastiere, E., Sofra, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep120</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Low-dose infusion with 'surgical transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block' in open nephrectomy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>890</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>889</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/890?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bilateral vocal cord paralysis and oedema after placement of a ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway in a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/890?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carron, M., Stefano, V., Ori, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep121</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bilateral vocal cord paralysis and oedema after placement of a ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway in a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>891</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>890</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/891?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Severe cerebral desaturation during anterior transapical beating heart aortic valve implantation]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/891?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mora, B., Skhirtladze, K., Dworschak, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep122</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Severe cerebral desaturation during anterior transapical beating heart aortic valve implantation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>892</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>891</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/893?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Pain Management. Chronic Pain]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/893?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tighe, K. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep109</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Pain Management. Chronic Pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>893</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>893</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/894?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Pain Management: Acute Pain]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/894?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buggy, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep110</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Pain Management: Acute Pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>894</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>894</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/894-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pain Management and Procedural Sedation Handbook]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/894-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Power, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep112</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pain Management and Procedural Sedation Handbook]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>895</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>894</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/895?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Diagnosis and Treatment of Breakthrough Pain]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/6/895?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atcheson, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep113</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Diagnosis and Treatment of Breakthrough Pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>895</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>895</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/NP?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In the May 2009 BJA ...]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/NP?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep081</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In the May 2009 BJA ...]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>In This Issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/585?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acustimulation of P6: an antiemetic alternative with no risk of drug-induced side-effects]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/585?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apfel, C. C., Kinjo, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep080</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acustimulation of P6: an antiemetic alternative with no risk of drug-induced side-effects]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>587</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>585</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/588?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patent foramen ovale and neurosurgery in sitting position: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/588?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We have conducted a systematic review of air embolism complications of neurosurgery in the sitting position and patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. It assesses the risk and benefit of PFO closure before neurosurgery in the sitting position. The databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trial Register were systematically searched from inception to November 2007 for keywords in both topics separately. In total, 4806 patients were considered for neurosurgery in sitting position and 5416 patients underwent percutaneous PFO closure. The overall rate of venous air embolism during neurosurgery in sitting position was 39% for posterior fossa surgery and 12% for cervical surgery. The rate of clinical and transoesophageal echocardiography detected paradoxical air embolism was reported between 0% and 14%. The overall success rate for PFO closure using new and the most common closure devices was reported 99%, whereas the average risk of major complications is &lt;1%. On the basis of our systematic review, we recommend screening for PFO and considering closure in cases in which the sitting position is the preferred neurosurgical approach. Our proposed management including the time of PFO closure according to available data is presented. However, the conclusions from our systematic review may be limited due to the lack of level A evidence and from using data from observational cohort studies. Thus, definite evidence-based recommendations require prospective evaluation of the issue in well-designed studies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fathi, A.-R., Eshtehardi, P., Meier, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patent foramen ovale and neurosurgery in sitting position: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>102</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>596</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>588</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/597?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Influence of continuous perioperative beta-blockade in combination with phosphodiesterase inhibition on haemodynamics and myocardial ischaemia in high-risk vascular surgery patients]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/102/5/597?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>We sought to assess the intra- and postoperative haemodynamic effects of continuous perioperative &beta;-adrenergic blockade combined with phosphodiesterase (PDE) III inhibition and its potential benefits in limiting perioperative myocardial ischaemia in high-risk vascular surgery patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Seventy-five patients were randomly assigned to receive tight heart rate (HR) control by a continuous infusion of: esmolol in combination with the PDE III inhibitor enoximone (esmolol+enoximone group), esmolol infusion alone (esmolol group), or standard therapy (control group) for a period of 48 h. Myocardial ischaemia and dysfunction were detected by serial plasma Troponin T (TnT) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Cardiac index (CI) increased significantly only in esmolol+enoximone-treated patients [CI: from 2.4 (0.2) litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> m<sup>&ndash;2</sup> at baseline to 3.2 (0.2) litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> m<sup>&ndash;2</sup> at 24 h after surgery; <I>P</I>=0.001] and was significantly higher than in the esmolol [CI: from 2.5 (0.2) litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> m<sup>&ndash;2</sup> at baseline to 2.6 (0.2) litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> m<sup>&ndash;2</sup> at 24 h; <I>P</I>=0.18] and the control groups [CI: from 2.4 (0.2) litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> m<sup>&ndash;2</sup> at baseline to 2.7 (0.2) litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> m<sup>&ndash;2</sup> at 24 h; <I>P</I>=0.13]. A significant postoperative release of TnT was detected only in control patients. Plasma BNP levels increased towards the end of surgery in all patients. Peak plasma BNP concentrations were significantly higher in control patients [293 (98) pg ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>] than in esmolol [118 (71) pg ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>] and in esmolol+enoximone-treated patients [78 (21) pg ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>].</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Inotropic therapy with the P