<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>British Journal of Anaesthesia - current issue</title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>British Journal of Anaesthesia - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1471-6771</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>December 2009</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>British Journal of Anaesthesia</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0007-0912</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/NP?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/783?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/785?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/789?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/792?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/800?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/805?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/811?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/817?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/822?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/828?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/833?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/840?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/848?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/858?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/861?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/867?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/874?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/882?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/886?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/891?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/896?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/899?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/900?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/901?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/902?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/903?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/905?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/905-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/906?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/907?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/908?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/NP?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In the December 2009 BJA ...]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/NP?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep331</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In the December 2009 BJA ...]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>In This Issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/783?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cuffed or uncuffed tracheal tubes during anaesthesia in infants and small children: time to put the eternal discussion to rest?]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/783?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lonnqvist, P. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep330</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cuffed or uncuffed tracheal tubes during anaesthesia in infants and small children: time to put the eternal discussion to rest?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>785</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>783</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/785?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[General anaesthesia vs local anaesthesia: an ongoing story]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/785?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bodenham, A. R., Howell, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep310</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[General anaesthesia vs local anaesthesia: an ongoing story]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>789</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>785</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/789?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management of diabetes during surgery: 30 yr of the Alberti regimen]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/789?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hall, G. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep315</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management of diabetes during surgery: 30 yr of the Alberti regimen]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>791</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>789</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/792?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transcatheter aortic valve insertion: anaesthetic implications of emerging new technology]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/792?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Transcatheter aortic valve insertion is a new development that potentially offers a number of advantages to patients and healthcare providers. These include the avoidance of sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass, and much faster discharge from hospital and return to functional status. The procedure itself however is quite complex, and presents significant demands in planning and implementation to the multidisciplinary team. Anaesthetic input is essential, and patient care in the perioperative period can be challenging. Early results have shown a significant mortality and morbidity rate, but the majority of procedures to date have been carried out in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities, making comparison with surgical aortic valve replacement inappropriate. Long-term outcomes are not yet known, but randomized controlled trials should allow this procedure and its application to be properly assessed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klein, A. A., Webb, S. T., Tsui, S., Sudarshan, C., Shapiro, L., Densem, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep311</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transcatheter aortic valve insertion: anaesthetic implications of emerging new technology]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>799</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>792</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/800?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/800?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Cardiac output (CO) cannot reliably be estimated by clinical examination. We aimed to measure the agreement between CO measurements using a supra-sternal Doppler monitor (USCOM, Coffs Harbour, Australia) and the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital. All patients with PAC <I>in situ</I> were eligible. Simultaneous CO readings were taken when clinically indicated. Investigators and clinicians were blinded to each other's results. The CO values used were the mean of three consecutive supra-sternal Doppler readings for patients with a sinus rhythm and seven for atrial fibrillation, and the mean of three thermodilution curves with acceptable form and values within 10% of each other for the PAC. Agreement was measured using both the paired <I>t</I>-test to calculate bias and limits of agreement and the intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Ninety-four subjects were enrolled. From 89 subjects, 250 paired comparisons were obtained. USCOM monitor readings were unobtainable in five patients. Mean supra-sternal Doppler CO was 5.5 litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup>. Bias was &ndash;0.09 litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> and levels of agreement were &plusmn; 2.92 litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> when compared with PAC. ICC was 0.46 (95% CI 0.36&ndash;0.56), and mean percentage difference was 19 (IQR 6&ndash;31)%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In our subjects, there was poor agreement between CO measurements done with the supra-sternal Doppler monitor and PAC.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thom, O., Taylor, D. M., Wolfe, R. E., Cade, J., Myles, P., Krum, H., Wolfe, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep296</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>804</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>800</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/805?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of xenon anaesthesia in isolated cardiopulmonary bypass on very early leucocyte and platelet activation and clearance: a randomized, controlled study]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/805?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with leucocyte and platelet activation and also organ dysfunction. Xenon has been found to have organ-protective effects. We therefore investigated the effect of isolated CPB on leucocyte and platelet activation and the efficacy of xenon in inhibiting these changes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Isolated CPB was conducted according to strict standardized clinical criteria using blood from healthy volunteers. They were randomized to an air&ndash;oxygen mixture (control group) <I>vs</I> xenon&ndash;oxygen mixture (xenon group). Blood samples were drawn at 5, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min from commencement of circuits and analysed for haemoglobin concentrations, white cell, neutrophil, monocyte, lymphocyte, and platelet counts. Leucocyte and platelet activation and also complex formation were determined by measuring levels of CD14++ monocytes, CD16+ monocytes, platelet&ndash;monocyte complexes, and platelet&ndash;neutrophil complexes (PNC). Differences between and within the groups were analysed with Student's <I>t</I>-test.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Biomarker levels were not different between the groups. The data were pooled to identify the effects of isolated bypass. The neutrophils, monocytes, platelets, CD14++ monocytes, and CD16+ monocytes decreased within 5 min of the bypass experiments, whereas the percentage of platelet&ndash;CD++ monocyte complexes and PNC increased.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Isolated CPB elicited rapid, substantial leucocyte and platelet activation, and xenon had no impact on inhibiting these changes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saravanan, P., Exley, A. R., Valchanov, K., Casey, N. D., Falter, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep297</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of xenon anaesthesia in isolated cardiopulmonary bypass on very early leucocyte and platelet activation and clearance: a randomized, controlled study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>810</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>805</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/811?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reduced cerebral oxygen saturation measured by absolute cerebral oximetry during thoracic surgery correlates with postoperative complications]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/811?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (S<SUB>ct</SUB>O<SUB>2</SUB>) has recently been shown to decrease significantly during thoracic surgery. The present study investigates whether these desaturations are related to postoperative complications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Fifty patients undergoing thoracic surgery with a single-lung ventilation (SLV) of &gt;45 min duration were enrolled. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation was measured using absolute oximetry; standard clinical variables, and SOFA and Clavien scores were recorded. Correlation between minimum S<SUB>ct</SUB>O<SUB>2</SUB> during SLV and postoperative complication scores was analysed using Pearson's correlation test, <I></I><sup>2</sup> test, and logistic regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Forty-seven patients underwent lobectomy, two patients a pneumonectomy and 1 patient a chest wall resection. Eighty-two per cent of the patients had a decrease in S<SUB>ct</SUB>O<SUB>2</SUB> of &gt;15% from baseline value, and 10% of the patients had a minimal absolute S<SUB>ct</SUB>O<SUB>2</SUB> value between 45% and 55%. The minimal absolute S<SUB>ct</SUB>O<SUB>2</SUB> values during SLV correlated with the Clavien score (<I>R</I><sup>2</sup>=0.098, <I>P</I>=0.0201) and the non-respiratory SOFA score (<I>R</I><sup>2</sup>=0.090, <I>P</I>=0.0287). By defining a threshold of S<SUB>ct</SUB>O<SUB>2</SUB>=65%, the odds ratio of having a non-respiratory organ failure was 2.37 (95% CI 1.18&ndash;4.39, <I>P</I>=0.043) and a complication according to the Clavien score (Clavien score &gt;0) was 3.19 (95% CI 1.60&ndash;6.34, <I>P</I>=0.0272).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Thoracic surgery with SLV seemed to be associated with a significant decrease in S<SUB>ct</SUB>O<SUB>2</SUB>, and minimal S<SUB>ct</SUB>O<SUB>2</SUB> values correlated positively with postoperative complications.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kazan, R., Bracco, D., Hemmerling, T. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep309</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reduced cerebral oxygen saturation measured by absolute cerebral oximetry during thoracic surgery correlates with postoperative complications]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>816</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>811</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/817?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of maintaining a remifentanil infusion on the recovery profiles during emergence from anaesthesia and tracheal extubation]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/817?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Emergence from anaesthesia and tracheal extubation can be associated with hyperdynamic circulatory responses. We examined the effects of maintaining a remifentanil infusion on recovery profiles such as coughing and cardiovascular responses after general anaesthesia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Forty patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery under general anaesthesia using total i.v. anaesthesia (propofol and remifentanil) were randomly allocated to a control group (<I>n</I>=20) or remifentanil group (<I>n</I>=20) during emergence from anaesthesia. At the end of surgery, propofol was ceased and the infusion of remifentanil was stopped in the control group and maintained in the remifentanil group at a target organ concentration of 1.5 ng ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup> until extubation. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and recovery profiles were measured and evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There was no significant difference in sex ratio, age, weight, height, time to eye opening, time to extubation, nausea, visual analogue scale, and time to discharge. Increases in HR and MAP occurred during emergence in the control group compared with baseline values. Increases in HR were attenuated in the remifentanil group and MAP decreased during recovery compared with baseline values. HR and MAP values were significantly higher in the control group [103 (23) beats min<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, 129 (17) mm Hg] compared with the remifentanil group [79 (17) beats min<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, 112 (15) mm Hg] during emergence and tracheal extubation. Moderate or severe coughing was observed only in the control group (8/20 <I>vs</I> 0/20, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Maintaining a remifentanil infusion reduced haemodynamic changes and coughing associated with tracheal extubation almost without significantly delaying recovery from anaesthesia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nho, J.-S., Lee, S.-Y., Kang, J.-M., Kim, M.-C., Choi, Y.-K., Shin, O.-Y., Kim, D.-S., Kwon, M.-I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep307</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of maintaining a remifentanil infusion on the recovery profiles during emergence from anaesthesia and tracheal extubation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>821</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>817</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/822?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determination of serum propofol concentrations by breath analysis using ion mobility spectrometry]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/822?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>We aimed to measure propofol concentrations in exhaled air with an ion mobility spectrometer coupled to a multicapillary column for pre-separation (MCC&ndash;IMS). In addition, we aimed to compare the values of these measurements with serum propofol concentrations, as determined by gas chromatography&ndash;mass spectrometry (GC&ndash;MS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Thirteen patients, ASA I or II, undergoing elective ENT surgery were studied. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2.1 (0.7) mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, rocuronium 0.5 (0.1) mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, and remifentanil 0.5 &micro;g kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> min<sup>&ndash;1</sup>. After tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with a continuous infusion of propofol 3.9 (1.8) mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> h<sup>&ndash;1</sup> and remifentanil 0.5 &micro;g kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> min<sup>&ndash;1</sup>. Simultaneously, a venous blood sample was obtained. Propofol concentrations in serum were determined by GC&ndash;MS and compared with the height of the respective propofol signals achieved by MCC&ndash;IMS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Twenty-four pairs of samples were obtained. The comparison of propofol concentrations in exhaled air and serum presented a bias of &ndash;10.5% and a precision of &plusmn; 12.3%. With these values, the 95% limits of agreement were 14.1% and &ndash;35.1%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>MCC&ndash;IMS may be a suitable method to determine propofol concentrations in exhaled air, and may be used to predict propofol concentrations in serum.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perl, T., Carstens, E., Hirn, A., Quintel, M., Vautz, W., Nolte, J., Junger, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep312</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determination of serum propofol concentrations by breath analysis using ion mobility spectrometry]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>827</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>822</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/828?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Respiratory impedance during weaning from mechanical ventilation in a mixed population of critically ill patients]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/828?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Worsening of respiratory mechanics during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) has been traditionally associated with weaning failure, although this finding is based on studies with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients only. The aim of our study was to assess the course of respiratory impedance non-invasively measured by forced oscillation technique (FOT) during a successful and failed SBT in a mixed population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Thirty-four weaning trials were reported in 29 consecutive mechanically ventilated patients with different causes of initiation of ventilation. During the SBT, the patient was breathing through a conventional T-piece connected to the tracheal tube. FOT (5 Hz, &plusmn; 1 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O, 30 s) was applied at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min. Respiratory resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs) were computed from pressure and flow measurements. The frequency to tidal volume ratio <I>f/V</I><SUB>t</SUB> was obtained from the flow signal. At the end of the trial, patients were divided into two groups: SBT success and failure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Mixed model analysis showed no significant differences in Rrs and Xrs over the course of the SBT, or between the success (<I>n</I>=16) and the failure (<I>n</I>=18) groups. In contrast, <I>f/V</I><SUB>t</SUB> was significantly (<I>P</I>&lt;0.001) higher in the failure group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Worsening of respiratory impedance measured by FOT is not a common finding during a failed SBT in a typically heterogeneous intensive care unit population of mechanically ventilated patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sellares, J., Acerbi, I., Loureiro, H., Dellaca, R. L., Ferrer, M., Torres, A., Navajas, D., Farre, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep301</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Respiratory impedance during weaning from mechanical ventilation in a mixed population of critically ill patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>832</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>828</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Critical Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/833?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Regulation of pentraxin-3 by antioxidants]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/833?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Pentraxin-3 (PTX3) may be a useful biomarker in sepsis, but its regulatory mechanisms are still unclear. Oxidative stress is well defined in patients with sepsis and has a role in regulation of inflammatory pathways which may include PTX3. We undertook an <I>in vitro</I> study of the effect of antioxidants on regulation of PTX3 in endothelial cells combined with a prospective observational pilot study of PTX3 in relation to markers of antioxidant capacity and oxidative stress in patients with sepsis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Human endothelial cells were cultured with lipopolysaccharide 2 &micro;g ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, peptidoglycan G 20 &micro;g ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)  10 ng ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, interleukin-1 (IL-1) &beta; 20 ng ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, or killed <I>Candida albicans</I> yeast cells plus either <I>N</I>-acetylcysteine (NAC) 25 mM, trolox 100 mM, or idebenone 1 &micro;M. Plasma samples were obtained from 15 patients with sepsis and 11 healthy volunteers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>PTX3 levels in plasma were higher in patients with sepsis than in healthy people [26 (1&ndash;202) ng ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup> compared with 6 (1&ndash;12) ng ml<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, <I>P</I>=0.01]. Antioxidant capacity was lower in patients with sepsis than healthy controls [0.99 (0.1&ndash;1.7) mM compared with 2.2 (1.3&ndash;3.3) mM, <I>P</I>=0.01]. In patients with sepsis, lipid hydroperoxide levels were 3.32 (0.3&ndash;10.6) nM and undetectable in controls. We found no relationship between PTX3 and antioxidant capacity or lipid hydroperoxides. Cell expression of PTX3 increased with all inflammatory stimulants but was highest in cells treated with TNF plus IL-1&beta;. PTX3 concentrations were lower in cells co-treated with antioxidants (all <I>P</I>&lt;0.05), associated with lower nuclear factor B expression for NAC and trolox (<I>P</I>&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PTX3 expression is down-regulated <I>in vitro</I> by antioxidants. Plasma levels of PTX3 are elevated in sepsis but seem to be unrelated to markers of oxidant stress or antioxidant capacity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hill, A. L., Lowes, D. A., Webster, N. R., Sheth, C. C., Gow, N. A. R., Galley, H. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep298</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Regulation of pentraxin-3 by antioxidants]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>839</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>833</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Critical Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/840?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of a recombinant FVIIa analogue, NN1731, on blood loss and survival after liver trauma in the pig]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/840?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>We considered whether haemorrhage after a liver trauma would be reduced by early administration of a pro-haemostatic agent and evaluated the effect of i.v. <I>vs</I> i.m. administration of the coagulation factor VIIa analogue NN1731 on haemorrhage after a liver trauma in the pig.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The pharmacokinetics of i.v. and i.m. NN1731 was evaluated in eight minipigs, and the effects of dose and administration route of NN1731 (i.v. 180 &micro;g kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, <I>n</I>=6; i.m. 540 &micro;g kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, <I>n</I>=4, or 2000 &micro;g kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, <I>n</I>=6) <I>vs</I> vehicle (<I>n</I>=16) were studied on a liver laceration injury in pigs. To simulate a pre-hospital setting, the administration of NN1731 was delayed by 1 min for i.m. administration and 7 min for i.v. administration, at which time fluid resuscitation also began.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the minipigs, NN1731 exposure was similar after i.v. 180 &micro;g kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> and i.m. 540 &micro;g kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, with a bioavailability of ~35%. The injury and blood loss at 7 min was comparable between the four groups of pigs; however, after 60 min, the blood loss was lower in the i.v. treated animals: 1.3 (0.3) (i.v.) <I>vs</I> 2.2 (0.8) litres (i.m.<SUB>540</SUB>, i.m.<SUB>2000</SUB>, and vehicle) (<I>P</I>&lt;0.001). Also, the survival time was increased: 117 (14) (i.v.) <I>vs</I> 84 (28) min (i.m.<SUB>540</SUB>, i.m.<SUB>2000</SUB>, and vehicle) (<I>P</I>&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>After a liver trauma in the pig, i.v. administration of NN1731 reduced the bleeding and increased the survival time. In contrast, i.m. administration had no effect, presumably because reduced muscle perfusion during haemorrhage reduced the uptake of NN1731.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zaar, M., Secher, N. H., Johansson, P. I., Vainer, B., Ezban, M., Agerso, H., Madsen, P. L., Lomholt, N., Hermit, M. B., Lauritzen, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep274</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of a recombinant FVIIa analogue, NN1731, on blood loss and survival after liver trauma in the pig]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>847</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>840</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Critical Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/848?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of the sedative properties of CNS 7056, midazolam, and propofol in sheep]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/848?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>CNS 7056 is an esterase-metabolized benzodiazepine sedative currently under development. Its short duration of action would suggest a clinical role similar to midazolam or propofol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The effect of a range of doses of CNS 7056, midazolam, and propofol on depth of sedation, the respiratory system, and the cardiovascular system was studied in chronically instrumented sheep (<I>n</I>=5 or 6). The low, medium, and high doses of CNS 7056, midazolam, and propofol were 0.37, 0.74, and 1.47 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup>; 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup>; and 1, 2, and 4 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>CNS 7056 produced substantial sedation with rapid onset and offset for all doses, with duration rather than depth of sedation increasing with the dose. The lower doses of midazolam had minimal sedative effect; increasing the dose produced variable but longer term sedation. Sedation from propofol was comparable with that of CNS 7056 for the medium and high doses only. The high doses produced ~20 min of sedation. All three drugs produced dose-dependent respiratory (e.g. reductions in arterial oxygen tension) and cardiovascular depression (e.g. reductions in mean arterial pressure). For CNS 7056, midazolam, and propofol, the magnitude of the cardiovascular and respiratory depression was proportional to the depth of sedation achieved for any given drug or dose. For all three drugs, the respiratory and cardiovascular depression was not of sufficient magnitude to endanger the animals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>CNS 7056 is a powerful and short-acting anaesthetic in sheep with respiratory and cardiovascular effects consistent with its sedative/anaesthetic qualities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Upton, R. N., Martinez, A. M., Grant, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep269</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of the sedative properties of CNS 7056, midazolam, and propofol in sheep]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>857</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>848</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Neurosciences And Neuroanaesthesia</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/858?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recombinant activated factor VII for a patient with factor VII deficiency undergoing urgent intracerebral haematoma evacuation with underlying cavernous angioma]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/858?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Inherited factor VII (FVII) deficiency is a rare autosomal-recessive bleeding disorder. There are no clear guidelines regarding therapy in such patients when intracerebral surgery is performed. We report the use of recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa) for the prophylaxis of bleeding in a female with FVII deficiency (8% of activity) undergoing urgent removal of a right fronto-rolandic intracerebral haematoma secondary to a bleeding from a cavernous angioma. To assist haemostasis during and after surgery, rFVIIa boluses were administered during the procedure and continued every 12 h during 3 days after operation to maintain a prothrombin time &lt;15 s. Using this approach, no abnormal bleeding or thromboembolic complications were observed and rFVIIa appeared safe in this context.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, N., Aldea, S., Francois, D., Cherqui-Michel, M., Giansily-Blaizot, M., Fischler, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep293</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recombinant activated factor VII for a patient with factor VII deficiency undergoing urgent intracerebral haematoma evacuation with underlying cavernous angioma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>860</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>858</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Neurosciences And Neuroanaesthesia</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/861?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Magnesium sulphate has beneficial effects as an adjuvant during general anaesthesia for Caesarean section]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/861?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The use of low concentrations of volatile anaesthetics with avoidance of opioids may induce intraoperative awareness and adverse haemodynamic responses during Caesarean section. Magnesium is well known to reduce anaesthetic requirements and to block noxious stimuli. We investigated whether i.v. magnesium sulphate modulates anaesthetic depth and analgesic efficacy during Caesarean section.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Seventy-two patients undergoing Caesarean section were randomly assigned to receive i.v. saline (control group) or magnesium sulphate 30 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> bolus+10 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> h<sup>&ndash;1</sup> continuous infusion (Mg 30 group) or 45 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> bolus+15 mg kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> h<sup>&ndash;1</sup> continuous infusion (Mg 45 group) after induction. Bispectral index (BIS) value, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and midazolam, fentanyl, and atracurium consumptions were recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>BIS values [mean (<scp>sd</scp>)] at 7.5 and 10 min after surgery and before delivery in the control [64 (9), 66 (8), 67 (8), <I>P</I>&lt;0.001] and the Mg 30 groups [62 (8), <I>P</I>&lt;0.01; 64 (7), 63 (9), <I>P</I>&lt;0.001] were higher than in the Mg 45 group [56 (8), 55 (8), 55 (7)]. MAP was greater in the control group (<I>P</I>&lt;0.05) than in the Mg 30 and Mg 45 groups during the pre-delivery period. The magnesium groups required less midazolam (<I>P</I>&lt;0.05), fentanyl (Mg 30, <I>P</I>&lt;0.05; Mg 45, <I>P</I>&lt;0.01), and atracurium (<I>P</I>&lt;0.001) <I>vs</I> the control group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Preoperative i.v. magnesium sulphate attenuated BIS and arterial pressure increases during the pre-delivery period. Magnesium sulphate can be recommended as an adjuvant during general anaesthesia for Caesarean section to avoid perioperative awareness and pressor response resulting from inadequate anaesthesia, analgesia, or both.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, D. H., Kwon, I. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep265</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Magnesium sulphate has beneficial effects as an adjuvant during general anaesthesia for Caesarean section]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>866</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>861</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Obstetrics</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/867?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective randomized controlled multi-centre trial of cuffed or uncuffed endotracheal tubes in small children]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/867?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The use of cuffed tracheal tubes (TTs) in small children is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare post-extubation morbidity and TT exchange rates when using cuffed <I>vs</I> uncuffed tubes in small children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients aged from birth to 5 yr requiring general anaesthesia with TT intubation were included in 24 European paediatric anaesthesia centres. Patients were prospectively randomized into a cuffed TT group (Microcuff&reg; PET) and an uncuffed TT group (Mallinckrodt&reg;, Portex&reg;, R&uuml;sch&reg;, Sheridan&reg;). Endpoints were incidence of post-extubation stridor and the number of TT exchanges to find an appropriate-sized tube. For cuffed TTs, minimal cuff pressure required to seal the airway was noted; maximal cuff pressure was limited at 20 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O with a pressure release valve. Data are mean (<scp>sd</scp>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 2246 children were studied (1119/1127 cuffed/uncuffed). The age was 1.93 (1.48) yr in the cuffed and 1.87 (1.45) yr in the uncuffed groups. Post-extubation stridor was noted in 4.4% of patients with cuffed and in 4.7% with uncuffed TTs (<I>P</I>=0.543). TT exchange rate was 2.1% in the cuffed and 30.8% in the uncuffed groups (<I>P</I>&lt;0.0001). Minimal cuff pressure required to seal the trachea was 10.6 (4.3) cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The use of cuffed TTs in small children provides a reliably sealed airway at cuff pressures of &le;20 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O, reduces the need for TT exchanges, and does not increase the risk for post-extubation stridor compared with uncuffed TTs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weiss, M., Dullenkopf, A., Fischer, J. E., Keller, C., Gerber, A. C., the European Paediatric Endotracheal Intubation Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep290</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective randomized controlled multi-centre trial of cuffed or uncuffed endotracheal tubes in small children]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>873</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>867</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/874?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of individual patient data from clinical trials: epidural morphine for postoperative pain]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/874?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Individual patient information from clinical trials is infrequently available, but can provide insights for clinical trials and practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We analysed individual patient information from five randomized trials (913 patients) of i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) plus epidural placebo, morphine sulphate (MS) 5 mg, or extended-release epidural morphine (EREM; DepoDur<SUP><SMALL><SMALL>TM</SMALL></SMALL></SUP>) at doses of 5&ndash;30 mg, to explore effects of a range of epidural morphine doses. Pain and opioid requirement on first and second postoperative days, dose&ndash;response, clinically relevant comparisons of IVPCA without epidural morphine, 5 mg MS, and 10 mg EREM, and relationship between patient rating and other measures were described.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There were three strong findings. Epidural morphine resulted in greater patient satisfaction, despite higher rates of adverse events. Those describing their analgesic medication as &lsquo;very good&rsquo; or &lsquo;excellent&rsquo; used IVPCA opioid less and had pain scores significantly below the global mean, whereas those describing their medication as &lsquo;poor&rsquo; or &lsquo;fair&rsquo; had pain scores significantly above the mean. Epidural morphine meant less need for postoperative IVPCA opioid than epidural placebo. The therapeutic gain with EREM was lower pain scores with less IVPCA opioid. Moderate or severe pruritus was more common with IVPCA plus epidural morphine, whatever the formulation, compared with IVPCA plus placebo.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Analysis of individual patient data from high-quality clinical trials provides important insights into characteristics of new agents not immediately apparent from original trials, and also informing clinical practice. Prophylactic epidural morphine provides a better patient experience than IVPCA alone.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mhuircheartaigh, R. J. N., Moore, R. A., McQuay, H. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep300</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of individual patient data from clinical trials: epidural morphine for postoperative pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>881</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>874</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regional Anaesthesia</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/882?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized crossover comparison between the i-gel and the LMA-Unique in anaesthetized, paralysed adults]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/882?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The i-gel differs from other supraglottic airway devices, in that it has a softer, non-inflatable cuff. This study was designed to compare the performance of the i-gel and the LMA-Unique (LMA-U) when used during anaesthesia in paralysed patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Both devices were studied in 39 anaesthetized, paralysed patients in a randomized crossover trial. The primary outcome was airway leak pressure. Secondary outcomes included time to insertion, the number of insertion and reposition attempts, leak volumes, and leak fractions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There was no significant difference between the airway leak pressures of the two devices [median (IQR) leak pressures 25 (22&ndash;30) <I>vs</I> 22 (20&ndash;28) cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O for the i-gel and LMA-U, respectively; <I>P</I>=0.083, 95% CI of the mean difference &ndash;0.32 to 4.88 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O]. The median (IQR) insertion time for the i-gel was significantly less than for the LMA-U [12.2 (9.7&ndash;14.3) <I>vs</I> 15.2 (13.2&ndash;17.3) s; <I>P</I>=0.007]. All the LMA-U devices and 38 of 39 i-gel airways were inserted at the first attempt. The number of manipulations required after insertion to achieve a clear airway was the same in both the groups (four in each). There were no statistically significant differences in leak volumes or leak fractions during controlled ventilation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We found no difference in leak pressures and success rate of first-time insertion between the i-gel and the LMA-U. Time to successful insertion was significantly shorter for the i-gel. We conclude that the i-gel provides a reasonable alternative to the LMA-U for controlled ventilation during anaesthesia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uppal, V., Gangaiah, S., Fletcher, G., Kinsella, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep292</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized crossover comparison between the i-gel and the LMA-Unique in anaesthetized, paralysed adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>885</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>882</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Respiration And The Airway</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/886?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/886?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The aim of this prospective study was to determine whether a level of positive airway pressure was generated in participants receiving nasal high flow (NHF) delivered by the Optiflow<SUP><SMALL><SMALL>TM</SMALL></SMALL></SUP> system (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand) in a cardiothoracic and vascular intensive care unit (ICU).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Nasopharyngeal airway pressure was measured in 15 postoperative cardiac surgery adult patients who received both NHF and standard facemask therapy at a flow rate of 35 litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup>. Measurements were repeated in the open mouth and closed mouth positions. Mean airway pressure was determined by averaging the pressures at the peak of inspiration of each breath within a 1 min period, allowing the entire pressure profile of each breath to be included within the calculation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Low level positive pressure was demonstrated with NHF at 35 litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> with mouth closed when compared with a facemask. NHF generated a mean nasopharyngeal airway pressure of mean (<scp>sd</scp>) 2.7 (1.04) cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O with the mouth closed. Airway pressure was significantly higher when breathing with mouth closed compared with mouth open (<I>P</I>&le;0.0001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study demonstrated that a low level of positive pressure was generated with NHF at 35 litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> of gas flow. This is consistent with results obtained in healthy volunteers.</p>
<p>Australian Clinical Trials Registry <inter-ref locator="www.actr.org.au" locator-type="url">www.actr.org.au</inter-ref> ACTRN012606000139572.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parke, R., McGuinness, S., Eccleston, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep280</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>890</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>886</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Respiration And The Airway</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/891?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of different methods of ventilation via cannula cricothyroidotomy in a trachea-lung model]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/891?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Cannula cricothyroidotomy is recommended in recent guidelines as a rescue intervention in the &lsquo;cannot-intubate cannot-ventilate&rsquo; scenario. Several methods of providing ventilation via a cannula cricothyroidotomy have been described, but there are no data comparing these methods and using cannulae of differing diameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using a bench-top trachea&ndash;lung model (comprising a Siemens test lung attached to commercially available breathing system tubing), we compared delivered minute volumes (MVs) for five methods of ventilation administered through cannulae of diameters 20, 16, 14, and 13 G. The ventilation methods were: an ENK oxygen flow modulator, a Manujet, a self-inflating resuscitation bag, the oxygen flush of an anaesthetic machine, and oxygen from a wall-mounted flow meter attached via a three-way tap to the cannula. All experiments were performed with and without a proximal 2.5 mm diameter constriction to simulate partial upper airway obstruction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>MVs increased with increasing cannula diameter. In the absence of a proximal constriction, MVs delivered via a 20 G cannula were &lt;1 litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> with all devices; only the Manujet delivered MVs &gt;2 litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, at cannula sizes of &ge;16 G. MVs were greater in the presence of a proximal constriction, but did not exceed 4 litre min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> using the low-pressure devices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Extrapolated to the clinical situation, these data suggest that low-pressure devices will not deliver adequate MVs via a cannula cricothroidotomy and should no longer be advocated. Purpose-made devices should be available in all areas where anaesthesia is administered or airway interventions are performed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flint, N. J., Russell, W. C., Thompson, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep264</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of different methods of ventilation via cannula cricothyroidotomy in a trachea-lung model]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>895</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>891</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Respiration And The Airway</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/896?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation: from flying blind to flying right?]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/896?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cannesson, M., Vallet, B., Michard, F., Lahner, D., Fleischmann, E., Hetz, H., Pestel, G., Gouvea, G., Diaz, R., Auler, L., Toledo, R., Martinho, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep321</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation: from flying blind to flying right?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>899</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>896</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/899?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Therapeutic dose of acetaminophen may induce fulminant hepatitis in the presence of risk factors: a report of two cases]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/899?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forget, P., Wittebole, X., Laterre, P.-F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:45 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep322</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Therapeutic dose of acetaminophen may induce fulminant hepatitis in the presence of risk factors: a report of two cases]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>900</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>899</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/900?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/900?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mukhtar, K., Singh, S., El-Dawlatly, A., (on behalf of the authors)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:46 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep323</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>901</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>900</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/901?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Continuous i.v. infusion of remifentanil and intraosseous lidocaine provide better analgesia than intraosseous lidocaine alone in percutaneous vertebroplasty of osteoporotic fractures]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/901?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dauri, M., Coniglione, F., Faria, S., Fiori, R., Frunzo, F., Massari, F., Simonetti, G., Sabato, A. F., Masala, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:46 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep324</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Continuous i.v. infusion of remifentanil and intraosseous lidocaine provide better analgesia than intraosseous lidocaine alone in percutaneous vertebroplasty of osteoporotic fractures]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>902</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>901</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/902?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[One-lung ventilation using ProsealTM laryngeal mask airway and Arndt endobronchial blocker in paediatric scoliosis surgery]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/902?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, P., Liang, W., Gu, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:46 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep325</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[One-lung ventilation using ProsealTM laryngeal mask airway and Arndt endobronchial blocker in paediatric scoliosis surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>903</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>902</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/903?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A unique effect of propofol on the jaw opening reflex]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/903?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toyosato, A., Someya, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:46 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep326</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A unique effect of propofol on the jaw opening reflex]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>904</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>903</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/905?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pain Management from Basics to Clinical Practice]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/905?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Power, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:46 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep278</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pain Management from Basics to Clinical Practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>905</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>905</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/905-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Structured Oral Examination in Clinical Anaesthesia: Practice Examination Papers]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/905-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barker, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:46 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep327</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Structured Oral Examination in Clinical Anaesthesia: Practice Examination Papers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>906</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>905</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/906?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cancer Pain (Clinical Pain Management)]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/906?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colvin, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:46 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep328</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cancer Pain (Clinical Pain Management)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>907</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>906</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/907?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Oxford Handbook of Critical Care]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/907?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Webster, N. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:46 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep329</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Oxford Handbook of Critical Care]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>907</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>907</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/908?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Proceedings of the 9th International Neuromuscular Meeting: Munich, Germany * July 1-4, 2009]]></title>
<link>http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/103/6/908?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:39:46 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bja/aep289</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Proceedings of the 9th International Neuromuscular Meeting: Munich, Germany * July 1-4, 2009]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>103</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>917</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>908</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>