Skip Navigation

If you wish to respond to a paper or other item already published in the BJA, please go to the abstract/full text version of that item and click on the link "E-Letters: Submit a response to the article".

Electronic Letters to:

Clinical Investigation:
A. Lavinio, I. Timofeev, J. Nortje, J. Outtrim, P. Smielewski, A. Gupta, P. J. Hutchinson, B. F. Matta, J. D. Pickard, D. Menon, and M. Czosnyka
Cerebrovascular reactivity during hypothermia and rewarming
Br. J. Anaesth. 2007; 0: aem118v1-8 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*E-letters: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read E-letter] Hypothermia and cerebrovascular reactivity
Andrea Lavinio   (3 July 2007)
[Read E-letter] Hyperthermia and the injured brain
Olaf L. Cremer   (29 June 2007)

Hypothermia and cerebrovascular reactivity 3 July 2007
Previous E-letter  Top
Andrea Lavinio
University of Cambridge - Università degli studi di Brescia

Send letter to journal:
Re: Hypothermia and cerebrovascular reactivity

Thanks to Dr Cremer for his comments.

Cremer and co-workers previously demonstrated that systemic temperature exceeding 40°C is associated with partial vasoparalysis of cerebral vessels in normal brains (1). Our findings suggest that a similar scenario may happen in head injured patients exposed to moderate hypothermia for refractory intracranial hypertension (2).

Cremer underlines that in our series of brain injured patients the hyperaemic derangement of cerebrovascular reactivity became apparent as soon as rewarming from moderate hypothermia exceeded the 37°C brain temperature threshold, reflecting a significantly increased vulnerability of cerebrovascular reactivity of the injured brain. We also emphasize that this phenomenon is commonly undetected by plain ICP monitoring, which lacks explicit information about cerebral vasoreactivity. In this regard, a steady ICP following rewarming from moderate hypothermia is often falsely reassuring, inducing sub-optimal control of systemic temperature in brain injured patients.

To provide further insight into this topic, we would like to share our unpublished observations regarding a series of 15 head injured patients, matched for age and severity of injury to the study population (2) but never exposed to brain temperatures lower than 35°C. While the cerebral pressure reactivity index (PRx) was demonstrated to be linearly related to brain temperature in the temperature range of 37°C - 39°C in patients treated with moderate hypothermia (R = 0.53; n = 17, P = 0.03), in this second group of patients never exposed to brain temperatures lower than 35°C we did not observed any significant relationship between brain temperature and PRx (n = 15, P = 0.83). It must be observed here that average PbCO2 was similar in the two groups (PbCO2 mean difference = 2 mmHg [0.21 kPa]; P = 0.36). Similarly, PbO2 in patients treated with moderate hypothermia (PbO2 = 17±10 mmHg [2.3±1.4 kPa]) was comparable to PbO2 in the group of patients not exposed to hypothermia (PbO2 = 20±11 mmHg [2.6±1.5 kPa], P = 0.45). However, while average PRx significantly correlated with PbO2 in patients exposed to moderate hypothermia (R = 0.66; n = 17, P = 0.004), in the same temperature range there was no significant relationship between PRx and PbO2 in the group of patients who were not actively cooled (n = 15, P = 0.78). We also investigated the relationship between PRx and brain temperature within all individual patients. In patients exposed to hypothermia PRx and brain temperature are positively correlated in 16 (67%) of 24 cases (median R = 0.85; IQR {0.80 – 0.88}), while in Controls a positive correlation between PRx and brain temperature was observed only in 4 (26%) out of 15 patients (median R = 0.00; IQR {-0.88 – 0.87}; P < 0.01). In summary, temperature dependent hyperaemic derangement of cerebrovascular reactivity seems to be a phenomenon specifically related to therapeutic hypothermia for refractory intracranial hypertension. However, it must also be emphasised that none of our patients was exposed to temperatures exceeding 40°C. Therefore our findings do not contradict Cremer’s experimental observations.

In conclusion, the exposure to moderate hypothermia seems to play an independent role in determining the vulnerability of cerebral vessels to rewarming in brain injured patients.

Dr Andrea Lavinio, MD

1. Cremer OL, Diephuis JC, van Soest H, et al. Cerebral oxygen extraction and autoregulation during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia in humans. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:1101–7.

2. Lavinio A, Timofeev I, Nortje J, et al. Cerebrovascular reactivity during hypothermia and rewarming. Br J Anaesth 2007 May 16; [Epub ahead of print]

Conflict of Interest:

None declared

Hyperthermia and the injured brain 29 June 2007
 Next E-letter Top
Olaf L. Cremer,
anesthesiologist/intensivist
Department of Intensive Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Send letter to journal:
Re: Hyperthermia and the injured brain

Sir – Lavinio and coworkers have touched upon an important topic by suggesting that temperatures above 37°C may cause hyperaemic derangement of cerebrovascular reactivity in severely head-injured patients.1 However, one of the major limitations of their retrospective analysis lies in the fact that the effects of temperature could not be separated from any temporal changes that occurred in the brain after injury. Rewarming took place at a time when inflammatory responses in the brain presumably had evolved significantly compared to when the patients were cooled.2 Indeed, the authors acknowledge that the fever and loss of autoregulation observed in their patients may both, in fact, be epiphenomena of inflammation and suggest that prospective studies be performed. In this respect, I would like to draw attention to a study that may provide some additional insight into this matter.

In 2004 we reported on the use of systemic hyperthermia as an experimental therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection who are non-responders to conventional treatment with interferon.3 During 23 experiments at 41.8°C we continuously measured cerebral oxygen extraction and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity in patients. At regular temperature intervals, we formally assessed cerebral pressure-flow autoregulation by static tests using phenylephrine infusion, and by measuring the transient hyperaemic response to carotid compression and release. Our data showed that temperatures exceeding 40°C were associated with a marked decrease in cerebral oxygen extraction, a proportional increase in cerebral blood flow velocity, and a transient impairment of pressure-flow autoregulation. These associations remained after multivariate adjustment for variations in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, mean arterial pressure and propofol blood concentration.

The current findings by Lavinio and co-workers seem to confirm these earlier observations of transient cerebral vasoparalysis and hyperaemia during profound hyperthermia in patients with normal brains. However, their data suggest that similar effects become apparent at much lower temperatures in patients with head trauma, possibly reflecting an increased vulnerability of the injured brain to the deleterious effects of heat.

1. Lavinio A, Timofeev I, Nortje J, et al. Cerebrovascular reactivity during hypothermia and rewarming. Br J Anaesth 2007 May 16; [Epub ahead of print]

2. Werner C, Engelhard K. Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Br J Anaesth 2007 Jul;99(1):4-9.

3. Cremer OL, Diephuis JC, van Soest H, et al. Cerebral oxygen extraction and autoregulation during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia in humans. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:1101–7.

Conflict of Interest:

None declared