If you wish to respond to a paper or other item already published in the BJA, please go to the abstract/full text version of that item and click on the link "E-Letters: Submit a response to the article".
Electronic Letters to:
|
|
E-letters: Electronic letters published:
-
![[Read E-letter]](/icons/misc/sectionDOWN.gif)
The debate about non-heart beating organ donation
- Peter J Shirley (19 June 2008)
|
|
|||
|
Peter J Shirley, Consultant in Intensive Care and Anaesthesia Royal London Hospital
Send letter to journal:
|
Editor- The paper by Thomas and colleagues [1] and the associated editorials [2,3] were extremely helpful in the ongoing debate about non- heart beating organ donation.(NHBOD) Our institution serves an ethnically diverse community and the subject of organ donation has had to be handled with great care for both cultural and religious reasons. The introduction of NHBOD was viewed with some concern by members of both the medical and nursing team. Excellent support from UK Transplant coordination staff and in-house bereavement staff has helped to overcome some of these genuine concerns. Discussions concerning treatment withdrawal are separated completely form those concerning organ donation and are conducted by different members of the team. The introduction of an adapted Liverpool Care Pathway into intensive care [4] for end of life care as a standard approach to treatment withdrawal has helped to guide all staff and relatives through a difficult process. Hospital policies regarding the inability to move bodies after death on a hospital bed and the proximity of the intensive care unit to the operating theatre has meant some adaptation in the withdrawal of treatment in cases where the wish for of NHBOD has been expressed. This occurs in a spacious anaesthetic room in the theatre suite, which can accommodate family members for the time it takes for the withdrawal process to run its course. It is now not our practice for patients to return to the intensive care unit if the time-frame for NHBOD is too long and the opportunity for donation has been missed. This has required education of theatre staff about the clear differences between NHBOD and organ donation where brain stem death is established. However despite the progress made in procuring organs by NHBOD it has been pointed out that it is not the whole solution [5] and the fact remains that there is still a wider debate to be had about the longer term plan for organ donation in the UK which for the time being will be played out largely at the local level. References 1. Thomas I, Caborn S, Manara AR. Experiences in the development of non-heart beating organ donation scheme in a regional neurosciences intensive care unit. Br J Anaeths 2008; 100: 820-826. 2. Smith M, Murphy P. A historic opportunity to improve organ donation rates in the UK Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 735-737 . 3. Bell MDD. Non-heart beating organ donation: in urgent need of intensive care. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 738-741 . 4. Liverpool Care Pathway Central Team UK. LCP in Intensive Care. LCP Non-Cancer Briefing Paper 2007: 12-14. www.mcpcil.org.uk 5. .Murphy P, Manara A, Bell D, Smith M. Controlled non-heart beating organ donation: neither the whole solution nor a step too far. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:526-530. Conflict of Interest:None declared |
|||