Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on February 20, 2009
British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aep013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/4/546    most recent
aep013v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jungbauer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Groeben, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jungbauer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Groeben, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients

A. Jungbauer, M. Schumann, V. Brunkhorst, A. Börgers and H. Groeben*

Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Clinics Essen-Mitte, Henricistr. 92, 45136 Essen, Germany

* Corresponding author. E-mail: h.groeben{at}kliniken-essen-mitte.de

Background: The Berci–Kaplan video laryngoscope was developed to improve the visualization of the glottis and ease tracheal intubation. Whether this technique is also effective in patients with an expected difficult intubation is unclear. We have prospectively evaluated the conditions and success rate of tracheal intubation in patients with a Mallampati score of III or IV.

Methods: Two hundred patients, undergoing general anaesthesia, were randomized to be intubated using direct laryngoscopy (n=100) or video laryngoscopy (n=100). Visualization of the vocal cords, success rate, time for intubation, and the need for additional manoeuvres (laryngeal manipulations, head positioning, and Eschmann stylet) were evaluated.

Results: Video laryngoscopy produced better results for the visualization of the glottis using Cormack and Lehane criteria (P<0.001), success rate (n=92 vs 99, P=0.017), and the time for intubation [60 (77) vs 40 (31) s, P=0.0173]. In addition, the number of optimizing manoeuvres was also significantly decreased [1.2 (1.3) vs 0.5 (0.7), P<0.001].

Conclusions: Video laryngoscopy, when compared with direct laryngoscopy for difficult intubations, provides a significantly better view of the cords, a higher success rate, faster intubations, and less need for optimizing manoeuvres. Therefore, we feel that the video laryngoscopy leads to a clinically relevant improvement of intubation conditions and can be recommended for difficult airway management.

Keywords: airway; anaesthetic techniques, laryngoscopy; equipment, airway


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
I. Ahmad, C. Ong, V. V. Parameswaran, H. Groeben, A. Jungbauer, M. Schumann, V. Brunkhorst, and A. Borgers
Video laryngoscopy and external laryngeal manipulation
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2009; 103(1): 134 - 135.
[Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Video laryngoscopy and external laryngeal manipulation, direct feedback provides better glottic views
Imran Ahmad, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 21 Apr 2009 [Full text]
Re: Video laryngoscopy and external laryngeal manipulation, direct feedback provides better glottic views
Harald Groeben, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 7 May 2009 [Full text]

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.