Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on February 17, 2009

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aep006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/4/551    most recent
aep006v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozian, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hedenstierna, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kozian, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hedenstierna, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Lung computed tomography density distribution in a porcine model of one-lung ventilation

A. Kozian1,2, T. Schilling1,2,*, H. Schütze2,3, F. Heres2, T. Hachenberg2 and G. Hedenstierna1

1 Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology, Uppsala University, Sweden
2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
3 Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research (IKND), Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany

* Corresponding author. E-mail: thomas.schilling{at}med.ovgu.de

Background: One-lung ventilation (OLV) exposes the dependent lung to increased mechanical stress which may affect the postoperative course. This study evaluates regional pulmonary gas/tissue distribution in a porcine model of OLV.

Methods: Nine anaesthetized and mechanically ventilated (VT=10 ml kg–1, FIO2=0.40, PEEP=5 cm H2O) pigs were studied. After lung separation by an endobronchial blocker, lateral thoracotomy and OLV were performed in six pigs. Three animals served as controls. Static end-expiratory and end-inspiratory spiral computed tomography (CT) scans were done before, during, and after OLV and at corresponding times in controls. CT images were analysed by defined regions of interest and summarized voxels were classified by defined lung X-ray density intervals (atelectasis, poorly aerated, normally aerated, and overaerated).

Results: Dependent lungs contained poorly aerated regions and atelectasis with a significant tidal recruitment during conventional two-lung ventilation (TLV) before OLV (expiration vs inspiration: atelectasis 29% vs 14%; poorly aerated 66% vs 44%; normally aerated 4% vs 41% of the dependent lung volume, P<0.05). During OLV (VT=10 ml kg–1), cyclic recruitment was increased. The density spectrum of the ventilated lung changed from consolidation to aeration (expiration vs inspiration: atelectasis 10% vs 2%; poorly aerated 71% vs 18%; normally aerated 19% vs 79%, P<0.05). After OLV, increased aeration remained with less atelectasis and poorly aerated regions. Lung density distribution in the non-dependent lung of OLV pigs was unaltered after the period of complete lung collapse.

Conclusions: Cyclic tidal recruitment during OLV in pigs was associated with a persistent increase of aeration in the dependent lung.

Keywords: Animals Procedures Act; lung, tidel volume; measurement techniques; surgery, thoracic; ventilation, one-lung; ventilation volumes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.