Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on November 21, 2008
British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aen332
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/55    most recent
aen332v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, T.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Martyn, J. A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, T.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Martyn, J. A. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Onset and effectiveness of rocuronium for rapid onset of paralysis in patients with major burns: priming or large bolus

T.-H. Han1,* and J. A. J. Martyn2

1 The Department of Anesthesia, 5937 JPP, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
2 The Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital and Shriners Hospital for Children, Boston, MA 02114, USA

* Corresponding author. E-mail: anthony-han{at}uiowa.edu

Background: Burn injury leads to resistance to the effects of non-depolarizing muscle relaxants. We tested the hypothesis that a larger bolus dose is as effective as priming for rapid onset of paralysis after burns.

Methods: Ninety adults, aged 18–59 yr with 40 (2)% [mean (SE)] burn and 30 (2) days after injury, received rocuronium as a priming dose followed by bolus (0.06+0.94 mg kg–1), or single bolus of either 1.0 or 1.5 mg kg–1. Sixty-one non-burned, receiving 1.0 mg kg–1 as a primed (0.06+0.94 mg kg–1) or full bolus dose, served as controls. Acceleromyography measured the onset times.

Results: Priming when compared with 1.0 mg kg–1 bolus in burned patients shortened the time to first appearance of twitch depression (30 vs 45 s, P<0.05) and time to maximum twitch inhibition (135 vs 210 s, P<0.05). The onset times between priming and higher bolus dose (1.5 mg kg–1) were not different (30 vs 30 s for first twitch depression and 135 vs 135 s for maximal depression, respectively). The onset times in controls, however, were significantly (P<0.05) faster than burns both for priming and for full bolus (15 and 15 s, respectively, for first twitch depression and 75 and 75 s for maximal depression). Priming caused respiratory distress in 10% of patients in both groups. Intubating conditions in burns were significantly better with 1.5 mg kg–1 than with priming or full 1.0 mg kg–1 bolus.

Conclusions: A dose of 1.5 mg kg–1 not only produces an initial onset of paralysis as early as 30 s, which we speculate could be a reasonable onset time for relief of laryngospasm, but also has an onset as fast as priming with superior intubating conditions and no respiratory side-effects.

Keywords: burns; neuromuscular block, rocuronium


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


E-letters:

Read all E-letters

The onset of rocuronium in patients with major burn
MOHAMMAD EL-ORBANY, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 10 Jan 2009 [Full text]
Response Letter to Editor
Tae-Hyung Han
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 17 Jan 2009 [Full text]

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.