Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on November 5, 2008

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aen320
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/117    most recent
aen320v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, T.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Fan, S.-Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, T.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Fan, S.-Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Effect of combining dexmedetomidine and morphine for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia

T.-F. Lin, Y.-C. Yeh, F.-S. Lin, Y.-P. Wang, C.-J. Lin, W.-Z. Sun* and S.-Z. Fan

Department of Anaesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung San South Road, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

* Corresponding author. E-mail: wzsun{at}ntu.edu.tw

Background: Perioperative use of dexmedetomidine is associated with reduction in postoperative analgesic requirements. This study examined whether dexmedetomidine added to i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine could improve analgesia while reducing opioid-related side-effects.

Methods: In this double-blinded, randomized, controlled study, 100 women undergoing abdominal total hysterectomy were allocated to receive either morphine 1 mg ml–1 alone (Group M) or morphine 1 mg ml–1 plus dexmedetomidine 5 µg ml–1 (Group D) for postoperative i.v. PCA, which was programmed to deliver 1 ml per demand with a 5 min lockout interval and no background infusion. Cumulative PCA requirements, pain intensities, cardiovascular and respiratory variables, and PCA-related adverse events were recorded for 24 h after operation.

Results: Compared with Group M, patients in Group D required 29% less morphine during the 0–24 h postoperative period and reported significantly lower pain levels from the second postoperative hour onwards and throughout the study. Whereas levels of sedation were similar between the groups at each observational time point, decreases in heart rate and mean blood pressure from presurgery baseline at 1, 2, and 4 h after operation were significantly greater in Group D (by a range of 5–7 beats min–1 and 10–13%, respectively). The 4–24 h incidence of nausea was significantly lower in Group D (34% vs 56.3%, P<0.05). There was no bradycardia, hypotension, oversedation, or respiratory depression.

Conclusions: The addition of dexmedetomidine to i.v. PCA morphine resulted in superior analgesia, significant morphine sparing, less morphine-induced nausea, and was devoid of additional sedation and untoward haemodynamic changes.

Keywords: analgesia, patient-controlled; analgesia, postoperative; analgesics opioid, morphine; pharmacology, dexmedetomidine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. Kato, Y. Ogawa, W. Kojima, K. Aoki, S. Ogawa, and K. Iwasaki
Cardiovascular reflex responses to temporal reduction in arterial pressure during dexmedetomidine infusion: a double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2009; 103(4): 561 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.