Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on October 26, 2007

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aem275
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/6/845    most recent
aem275v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeleazcov, C.
Right arrow Articles by Albrecht, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jeleazcov, C.
Right arrow Articles by Albrecht, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

EEG variables as measures of arousal during propofol anaesthesia for general surgery in children: rational selection and age dependence

C. Jeleazcov1,*, J. Schmidt1, B. Schmitz2, K. Becke1 and S. Albrecht1

1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstr. 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
2 Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg

* Corresponding author. E-mail: christian.jeleazcov{at}kfa.imed.uni-erlangen.de

Background: Clinical benefits of measuring processed EEG during anaesthesia in adults, such as improved recovery and reduced risk of awareness, may also be valid in children. This study evaluated a rational selection of EEG variables as measures of arousal during surgical anaesthesia in children.

Methods: Sixty children undergoing surgical anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil were enrolled. The performance of 33 single EEG variables and bispectral index (BIS) was assessed by simultaneous analysis of prediction probability (Pk) of Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Sedation Scores and their signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Variables performing best in Pk and SNR analysis were selected as potential measures of arousal. Their performance was investigated in five age groups, 0–1, 1–2, 2–5, 5–8, and 8–13 yr.

Results: Single EEG variables such as relative power from frequency bands 13–20 and 20–26 Hz, SEF95, and approximate entropy performed best with Pk>0.59 and SNR>5.50. The Pk and SNR of BIS were 0.71 and 15.76, respectively. Their performance was significantly better in children aged 1–13 yr than in 0–1 yr.

Conclusions: BIS may provide a measure of arousal during propofol anaesthesia in children, but its accuracy is less in infants younger than 12 months. Single EEG variables such as high-frequency components of EEG, SEF95, and approximate entropy may be of limited value to detect arousal in the individual paediatric patient.

Keywords: EEG, anaesthesia, paediatric; monitoring, intraoperative


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
Y. Abulhasan, N. Buu, and C. Frigon
Perioperative use of dexmedetomidine in an infant with familial dysautonomia
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2009; 103(3): 413 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Jeleazcov, H. Ihmsen, J. Schmidt, C. Ammon, H. Schwilden, J. Schuttler, and J. Fechner
Pharmacodynamic modelling of the bispectral index response to propofol-based anaesthesia during general surgery in children
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2008; 100(4): 509 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.