BJA Advance Access published online on July 6, 2007
British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aem189
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New parameters of skin conductance compared with bispectral index® monitoring to assess emergence from total intravenous anaesthesia
1 Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Wellington Street Campus, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
2 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
3 School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
* Corresponding author: Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Wellington Street Campus, Perth, WA 6000, Australia. E-mail: thomas.ledowski{at}health.wa.gov.au
Background: Arousal after total i.v. anaesthesia (TIVA) has been reported to be detectable by monitoring the number of fluctuations per second (NFSC), a parameter of skin conductance (SC). However, compared with monitoring of the bispectral index (BIS®), the predictive probability of NFSC was significantly lower. The aim of this study was to determine the value of the two new, not yet published parameters of SC, area under the curve (AUC) methods A and B, for monitoring emergence from TIVA compared with monitoring of NFSC and BIS®.
Methods: Twenty-five patients undergoing surgery were investigated. NFSC, AUC A, AUC B, BIS®, and haemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure and heart rate) were recorded simultaneously. The performance of the monitoring devices in distinguishing between the clinical states steady-state anaesthesia, first clinical reaction, and extubation were compared using the method of prediction probability (Pk) calculation.
Results: BIS® showed the best performance in distinguishing between steady-state anaesthesia vs first reaction (Pk BIS® 0.95; NFSC 0.73; AUC A 0.54; AUC B 0.62) and steady-state anaesthesia vs extubation (Pk BIS® 0.99; NFSC 0.73; AUC A 0.71; AUC B 0.67). However, the time from first BIS®>60/SC>0 to a first clinical reaction was significantly shorter for BIS® (median BIS® 180 s; NFSC 780 s; AUC A 750 s; AUC B 690 s; P<0.001).
Conclusions: AUC A and AUC B did not improve accuracy of SC monitoring in patients waking after TIVA.
Keywords: anaesthetics i.v.; monitoring, bispectral index; monitoring, depth of anaesthesia; sympathetic nervous system