Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on July 10, 2007
British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aem183
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/3/440    most recent
aem183v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Effects of using two airway exchange catheters on laryngeal passage during change from a double-lumen tracheal tube to a single-lumen tracheal tube

A. Suzuki*, M. Uraoka, K. Kimura and S. Sato

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192, Japan

* Corresponding author. E-mail: akiras{at}hama-med.ac.jp

Background: A thin airway exchange catheter (AEC) is often used for changing from a double-lumen tracheal tube (DLT) to a single-lumen tracheal tube. However, passage of the tube into the trachea is often difficult. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using two AECs for tracheal tube exchange.

Methods: In Study 1, 30 patients were randomly allocated to two groups and one AEC was inserted into the trachea in one group, and two AECs in the other group. A tracheal tube was advanced into the pharynx over the AEC(s). A blinded observer assessed the difficulty of passing the tube into the trachea. In Study 2, another group of 30 patients (whose airways had been managed with DLTs) were randomly allocated to two groups, and either one or two AECs were inserted into the DLT depending upon the group allocation. The difficulty of passing the tube into the trachea was assessed and the time required for exchange was measured.

Results: The use of two AECs reduced the incidence of impingement of the tube into the trachea during the AEC-guided tracheal intubation (Study 1) from 93 to 33% (P<0.05) and during exchange from a DLT to a single-lumen tracheal tube (Study 2) from 100 to 27% (P<0.05). The exchange time was similar: 106 (7) and 116 (4) s [mean (SD)] for one and two AECs, respectively.

Conclusion: The use of two AECs reduces the incidence of impingement of the tube into the trachea during tracheal tube exchange.

Keywords: clinical trials; complications, intubation tracheal; equipment, airway exchange catheter


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.