Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on July 4, 2007

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aem177
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/3/337    most recent
aem177v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sakka, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by van Hout, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sakka, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by van Hout, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis{dagger},{ddagger}

S. G. Sakka1,*, J. Kozieras2, O. Thuemer2 and N. van Hout2

1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Center Cologne-Merheim, Cologne, Germany
2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Germany

* Corresponding author: Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Center Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimerstr. 200, D-51109 Cologne, Germany. E-mail: sakkas{at}kliniken-koeln.de

Background: Recently, continuous monitoring of cardiac output (CO) based on pulse contour analysis (Vigileo®) has been introduced into practice. In this clinical study, we evaluated the accuracy of this system by comparing it with the transpulmonary thermodilution technique (TPID) in septic patients.

Methods: We studied 24 mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock (16 male, 8 female, age 26–77 yr) receiving treatment with norepinephrine who for clinical indication underwent haemodynamic monitoring by the transpulmonary thermodilution technique using a PiCCO®plus system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany). In parallel, arterial pulse contour was applied using the femoral arterial pressure curve (FloTrac® pressure sensor, Vigileo® monitor, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, USA). After baseline measurement, mean arterial pressure was elevated by increasing norepinephrine dosage, and CO was measured again before mean arterial pressure was reduced back to baseline levels. Fluid status and ventilator settings remained unchanged throughout. At each time point, CO by transpulmonary thermodilution was calculated from three central venous bolus injections of 15 ml of saline (<8°C). Linear regression and the Bland–Altman method were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Overall, CO was 6.7 (SD 1.8) (3.2–10.1) litre min–1 for CO(TPID) and 6.2 (2.4) (3.0–17.6) litre min–1 for CO(Vigileo®). Linear regression revealed: CO(Vigileo®)=1.54+0.72xCO(TPID) litre min–1, r2=0.26 (P<0.0001). Mean bias between techniques [CO(TPID)–CO(Vigileo®)] was 0.5 litre min–1 (SD 2.3 litre min–1). Correlation coefficients at the three time points were not significantly different from each other.

Conclusions: Pulse contour analysis-derived CO (Vigileo® system) underestimates CO(TPID) and is not as reliable as transpulmonary thermodilution in septic patients.

Keywords: heart, cardiac output; measurement techniques, thermodilution; monitoring, arterial pressure; monitoring, cardiopulmonary; monitoring, intensive care


{dagger} This work was presented in part at the annual congress of the German Society of Anaesthesiologists, 18–21.05.2006, Leipzig (Germany), and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), 14–18.10.2006, Chicago (USA).

{ddagger} Declaration of interest. S.G.S. has received honoraria from Pulsion Medical Systems AG, Munich, Germany for giving lectures.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. W. L. Scheeren, C. Wiesenack, F. D. Compton, B. Zukunft, C. Hoffmann, W. Zidek, and J.-H. Schaefer
Performance of a minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring system (Flotrac/Vigileo)
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2008; 101(2): 279 - 280.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Matthieu, N.-G. Karine, C. Vincent, V. Alain, C. J. Francois, R. Philippe, and S. Francois
Cardiac Output Measurement in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation: Pulmonary Artery Catheter Versus Uncalibrated Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1480 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
F. D. Compton, B. Zukunft, C. Hoffmann, W. Zidek, and J.-H. Schaefer
Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (FlotracTM/VigileoTM) in haemodynamically unstable patients
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2008; 100(4): 451 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.