Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on February 15, 2007

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/ael373
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/4/497    most recent
ael373v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Columb, M. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Columb, M. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

An isobolographic analysis of diamorphine and levobupivacaine for epidural analgesia in early labour

G. A. McLeod1,*, B. Munishankar1 and M. O. Columb2

1 Department of Anaesthetics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
2 Acute Block Intensive Care Unit, South Manchester University Hospital, Wythenshawe, UK

* Corresponding author: Department of Anaesthetics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland. E-mail: g.a.mcleod{at}dundee.ac.uk

BACKGROUND: Few data describe the pharmacological interactions between local anaesthetics and opioids. The aim of this study was to measure the median effective concentration (MEC) of diamorphine and levobupivacaine when given separately and as mixtures for epidural analgesia, and determine whether the combination is additive or synergistic.

METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients were enrolled in this prospective randomized, two-phase, double-blind study. In the first phase, 60 women were randomized to receive a fixed 20 ml volume of either levobupivacaine or diamorphine epidurally . Dosing was determined using up-down sequential allocation with testing intervals, respectively, of 0.01%w/v and 12.5 µg ml–1. After estimations of the MEC of levobupivacaine and diamorphine, a further 60 patients were randomized in the second phase to one of the three mixtures: (a) diamorphine 70 µg ml–1 (fixed) and levobupivacaine (testing interval 0.004%w/v, starting at 0.044%w/v); (b) levobupivacaine 0.044%w/v (fixed) and diamorphine (testing interval 7 µg ml–1, starting at 70 µg ml–1); and (c) bivariate diamorphine and levobupivacaine (testing intervals of 7 µg ml–1 and 0.004%w/v starting at 70 µg ml–1 and 0.044% w/v respectively).

RESULTS: The MEC estimates from the first phase were 143.8 µg ml–1 (95% CI 122.2–165.3) for diamorphine and 0.083%w/v (95% CI 0.071–0.095) for levobupivacaine. In the second phase, the MEC and interaction index ({gamma}) of the three combinations were: diamorphine 65.5 µg ml–1 (56.8–74.2), {gamma} = 0.99; levobupivacaine 0.041%w/v (0.037–0.049), {gamma} = 0.98; and for the fixed combination diamorphine 69.5 µg ml–1 (60.5–78.5) and levobupivacaine 0.044%w/v (0.039–0.049), {gamma} = 1.02.

CONCLUSION: The combination of diamorphine and levobupivacaine is additive and not synergistic when used for epidural analgesia in the first stage of labour.

Keywords: anaesthesia, obstetric;; anaesthetic techniques, epidural;; anaesthetics local, levobupivacaine;; analgesics opioid, diamorphine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.