Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on January 19, 2007
British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/ael361
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/401    most recent
ael361v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, H.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, Y.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, H.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, Y.-J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The coiling length of thoracic epidural catheters: the influence of epidural approach angle{dagger}

H.-G. Ryu, J.-H. Bahk*, C.-J. Lee and Y.-J. Lim

Department of Anesthesiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

* Corresponding author: Department of Anesthesiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yongon-dong Chongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea 110-744. E-mail: bahkjh{at}snu.ac.kr

BACKGROUND: Thoracic epidural catheters are used for anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Usually, epidural catheters are placed without confirmation of their position despite frequent reports of complications as a result of malposition. In this study, we evaluated the threading length of thoracic epidural catheters without coiling and assessed the influence of two different epidural approach angles on the threading length without coiling.

METHODS: Eighty-three patients scheduled for thoracotomy were enrolled and randomly allocated into the acute angle group and the obtuse angle group. In both groups, skin insertion was performed at the T8–9 intervertebra level. Epidural access was performed under fluoroscopy using a paramedian approach at the T7–8 level in the acute angle group and at the T6–7 level in the obtuse angle group, and an end-hole 19-gauge epidural catheter was inserted. Coiling length, defined as the length of the catheter within the epidural space when any part of the catheter just begins to head caudally, was measured in both groups.

RESULTS: The coiling length was 7.4(4.4) cm (95% CI 6.0–8.7 cm) in the obtuse angle group compared with 4.9(3.3) cm (95% CI 3.8–6.0 cm) in the acute angle group (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS: Approaching the thoracic epidural space with an obtuse approach angle provides longer coiling length. We recommend that an obtuse approach angle should be used to maximize the chance of the catheter reaching the intended level with minimum risk of coiling.

Keywords: anaesthetic techniques, epidural; approach angle; coiling length; equipment; catheters epidural

{dagger}This study was presented for poster discussion as an abstract at the 2006 European Society of Anesthesiologists meetings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.