Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on August 21, 2006
British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/ael214
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/5/732    most recent
ael214v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yem, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yem, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Accepted May 19, 2006

Laboratory Investigation

Sources of error in partial rebreathing pulmonary blood flow measurements in lungs with emphysema and pulmonary embolism{dagger}

J. S. Yem 1, M. J. Turner 1 *, and A. B. Baker 1

1 Department of Anaesthetics, The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
M. J. Turner, E-mail: mjturner{at}usyd.edu.au


  Abstract

Background. Studies of the accuracy of partial rebreathing measurements of pulmonary blood flow (PBF) in patients with abnormal lungs have not fully explained the sources of error.

Methods. We used computer models of emphysema and pulmonary embolism incorporating both ventilation-perfusion ({Vdot}/{Qdot}) and ventilation-volume ({Vdot}/V) heterogeneity to investigate systematic errors in partial rebreathing PBF measurements. We studied (i) errors produced under usual conditions, (ii) effects of recirculation, (iii) effects of alveolar-proximal airway and alveolar-capillary PCO2 and {Vdot}CO2 differences, (iv) effects of alveolar {Vdot}/{Qdot} inhomogeneity and (v) effects of rebreathing time.

Results. In the pulmonary embolism model the systematic error is only acceptable (<10%) when the simulated PBF is low (2-3 litre min-1). In the emphysema model PBF is underestimated by more than 20% at all cardiac outputs studied. Four sources of systematic errors were found. (i) Alveolar-proximal airway PCO2 gradients and flux differences between the proximal airway and alveolar compartments contribute most to the systematic error. (ii) {Vdot}/{Qdot} inhomogeneity causes PCO2 gradients between the alveolar compartments and pulmonary capillary blood, and between pulmonary capillary compartments. (iii) Rebreathing times are inadequate in the presence of {Vdot}/V mismatch. (iv) The apparent effect of venous blood recirculation is small in emphysema but significant in pulmonary embolism.

Conclusions. We conclude that PBF cannot be measured accurately by partial rebreathing in lungs with emphysema or embolism. Systematic errors are caused mainly by errors in end-tidal PCO2 values.

Keywords: complications, error; lung, rebreathing; heart, cardiac output; lung, disease.
{dagger}Conference presentations: Sources of error in non-invasive pulmonary blood flow measurements by partial rebreathing in lungs with emphysema or pulmonary embolism. XIII World Congress Of Anaesthesiologists, April 2004, Paris, France.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
J. S. Yem, M. J. Turner, A. B. Baker, I. H. Young, and A. B. H. Crawford
A tidally breathing model of ventilation, perfusion and volume in normal and diseased lungs
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2006; 97(5): 718 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.