Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on May 23, 2006

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/ael121
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/2/200    most recent
ael121v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willschke, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kapral, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Willschke, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kapral, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Accepted April 3, 2006

Clinical Investigation

Epidural catheter placement in children: comparing a novel approach using ultrasound guidance and a standard loss-of-resistance technique

H. Willschke 1, P. Marhofer 1 *, A. Bösenberg 2, S. Johnston 2, O. Wanzel 3, C. Sitzwohl 1, S. Kettner 1, and S. Kapral 1

1 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna
2 Department of Anaesthesia, University of Cape Town, Red Cross Children's Hospital, Klipfontein Road, Rondebosch 7700, Cape Town, South Africa
3 Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Gersthof Orthopedic Hospital, 1180 Vienna, Austria

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
P. Marhofer, E-mail: peter.marhofer{at}meduniwien.ac.at


   Abstract

Background. We report a prospective, randomized study to evaluate ultrasound guidance for epidural catheter placement in children 0-6 yr of age.

Methods. Epidural catheters were placed at lumbar or thoracic cord levels in 64 children undergoing major surgery, using either ultrasonography or loss-of-resistance (LOR) for guidance. Using a 5-10 MHz linear ultrasound probe, the neuraxial structures were identified, the skin-epidural depth and epidural space was measured, the advancing epidural catheter visualized, and the spread of local anaesthetic verifying catheter position was confirmed. Epidural placement procedures were analysed for bone contacts and speed of execution. Children under 6 months were analysed separately.

Results. Epidural placement involved bone contacts in 17% of children in the ultrasound group and 71% of children in the LOR group (P<0.0001). Epidurals were executed more swiftly in the ultrasound group [162 (75) s vs 234 (138) s; P<0.01]. Children under 6 months revealed a 0.9 correlation between skin-epidural depth and body weight.

Conclusions. Ultrasonography is a useful aid to verify epidural placement of local anaesthetic agents and epidural catheters in children. Advantages include a reduction in bone contacts, faster epidural placement, direct visualization of neuraxial structures and the spread of local anaesthetic inside the epidural space. Ultrasound guidance requires additional training and good manual skills, and should only be used once experience in ultrasound-guided techniques of regional anaesthesia has been acquired.

Keywords: anaesthesia, paediatric; anaesthetic techniques, epidural; measurement techniques, ultrasonography.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Gonano, S. C. Kettner, M. Ernstbrunner, K. Schebesta, A. Chiari, and P. Marhofer
Comparison of economical aspects of interscalene brachial plexus blockade and general anaesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2009; 103(3): 428 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
O J Arthurs, M Murray, M Zubier, J Tooley, and W Kelsall
Ultrasonographic determination of neonatal spinal canal depth
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2008; 93(6): F451 - F454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Marhofer and V. W. S. Chan
Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: Current Concepts and Future Trends
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1265 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
P. M. Hopkins
Ultrasound guidance as a gold standard in regional anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2007; 98(3): 299 - 301.
[Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Ultrasound guided epidural catheter placement in children without test dose may be unsafe.
Baljit Singh, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 15 Nov 2006 [Full text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.