Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on March 17, 2006

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/ael066
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/5/640    most recent
ael066v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niemi, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niemi, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, P. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Accepted February 18, 2006

Clinical Investigation

Comparison of ropivacaine 2 mg ml-1 and prilocaine 5 mg ml-1 for i.v. regional anaesthesia in outpatient surgery

T. T. Niemi 1 *, P. J. Neuvonen 2, and P. H. Rosenberg 1

1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
2 Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
T. T. Niemi, E-mail: tomi.niemi{at}hus.fi


   Abstract

Background. Ropivacaine 2 mg ml-1 (0.2%) provides longer-lasting analgesia after deflation of the tourniquet cuff, with fewer side-effects, than lidocaine 5 mg ml-1 (0.5%) after i.v. regional anaesthesia (IVRA). Whether ropivacaine 2 mg ml-1 also exerts this advantage over prilocaine 5 mg ml-1, the local anaesthetic of choice in IVRA in most European countries was investigated in this study.

Methods. Sixty outpatients scheduled for forearm or hand surgery received IVRA with 40 ml of ropivacaine 2 mg ml-1 (Ropi) or prilocaine 5 mg ml-1 (Prilo) in a randomized, double-blinded fashion. The development and recovery of pin-prick analgesia and motor power of the hand, as well as ropivacaine and prilocaine plasma concentrations (n=30), were assessed during and after operation.

Results. Anaesthesia for surgery was adequate in both groups. Pin-prick analgesia was achieved at a similar rate, except in the radial nerve distribution area where at 10 min 60% of Ropi and 90% of Prilo patients had analgesia (P=0.017). At 10 min 100 and 97% had motor block of the hand in the Ropi and Prilo groups, respectively. Recovery of the sensory block in all innervation areas was already observed 2 min after the tourniquet cuff release. At 10 min after releasing the tourniquet cuff 31% of the Ropi patients and none of the Prilo patients still had analgesia in the median nerve distribution (P=0.004). At 12 min, 42% in the Ropi group and none in the Prilo group had decreased grip strength. After the release of the tourniquet, mean plasma concentrations of ropivacaine were higher than those of prilocaine. The highest individual concentration of ropivacaine was 1.65 µg ml-1 and that of prilocaine 0.6 µg ml-1. None of the Ropi patients experienced any symptoms of local anaesthetic toxicity.

Conclusions. Compared with prilocaine 5 mg ml-1, analgesia in IVRA with ropivacaine 2 mg ml-1 developed slightly more slowly, while motor block developed at a similar rate. After the release of the tourniquet, sensation recovered quickly and at a similar rate in the two groups, except for a slightly slower recovery after ropivacaine in the innervation area of the median nerve, but no surgically useful extended analgesia after the cuff deflation was observed. Despite a 60% lower milligram-dose, ropivacaine plasma concentrations were markedly higher than those of prilocaine.

Keywords: anaesthetic techniques, i.v. regional; anaesthetics local, prilocaine; anaesthetics local, ropivacaine.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. J. Litz, T. Roessel, A. R. Heller, and S. N. Stehr
Reversal of Central Nervous System and Cardiac Toxicity After Local Anesthetic Intoxication by Lipid Emulsion Injection
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1575 - 1577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.