Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on March 10, 2006

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/ael047
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/5/660    most recent
ael047v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wajima, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wajima, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Accepted January 23, 2006

Clinical Investigation

Effect of prophylactic bronchodilator treatment with i.v. carperitide on airway resistance and lung compliance after tracheal intubation

Z. Wajima 1 *, T. Shiga 1, K. Imanaga 1, T. Inoue 1, and R. Ogawa 2

1 Department of Anaesthesia, Chiba-Hokusoh Hospital, Nippon Medical School, 1715 Kamagari, Inba-mura, Inba-gun, Chiba 270-1694, Japan
2 Department of Anaesthesiology, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Z. Wajima, E-mail: HFB01245{at}nifty.com


   Abstract

Background. Lung resistance increases after induction of anaesthesia. We hypothesized that prophylactic bronchodilation with i.v. carperitide before tracheal intubation would decrease airway resistance and increase lung compliance after placement of the tracheal tube in both smokers and nonsmokers.

Methods. Ninety-seven adults aged between 24 and 59 yr were randomized to receive i.v. normal saline (0.9% saline) (control) or carperitide, 0.2 µg kg-1 min-1 throughout the study. The 97 patients included smokers and nonsmokers. Thus the patients were allocated to one of the four groups: smokers who received normal saline (n=21), nonsmokers who received normal saline (n=27), smokers who received carperitide (n=19) or nonsmokers who received carperitide (n=30). Thirty minutes after starting normal saline or carperitide infusion, we administered thiamylal 5 mg kg-1 and fentanyl 5 µg kg-1 to induce general anaesthesia and vecuronium 0.3 mg kg-1 for muscle relaxation. Continuous infusion of thiamylal 15 mg kg-1 h-1 followed anaesthetic induction. Mean airway resistance (Rawm), expiratory airway resistance (Rawe) and dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) were determined 4, 8, 12 and 16 min after tracheal intubation and compared between the four groups.

Results. At 4 min after intubation, Rawm and Rawe were higher and Cdyn lower in smokers than in nonsmokers in the control group. Rawm and Rawe were lower and Cdyn higher in smokers in the carperitide group than in smokers in the control group. Rawm and Rawe were lower in nonsmokers in the carperitide group than in nonsmokers in the control group.

Conclusions. Marked bronchoconstriction occurred in the control groups (smokers and nonsmokers) 4 min after tracheal intubation. Prophylactic treatment with carperitide before induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation was advantageous, particularly in smokers.

Keywords: anaesthetic techniques, tracheal intubation; complications, bronchospasm; pharmacology, carperitide.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.