BJA Advance Access published online on January 27, 2006
British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/ael017
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Anaesthesia, Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Road, Hull HU3 2JZ, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Background. During general anaesthesia in the presence of neuromuscular blocking drugs clinical criteria cannot detect the presence of consciousness. Various ‘depth of anaesthesia’ monitors are available which claim to prevent consciousness and/or reduce anaesthetic drug use. This study uses the Narcotrend anaesthesia brain monitor to guide anaesthetic administration but at the same time checks for the presence of intra-operative consciousness by using the ‘isolated forearm’ technique throughout the whole surgical/anaesthetic procedure. Methods. Twelve women presenting for major gynaecological surgery under general anaesthesia, which included the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs, had a target controlled infusion of propofol adjusted according to the anaesthetic ‘stage’ indicated by a Narcotrend ‘Depth of Anaesthesia Monitor’. Throughout surgery the isolated forearm technique was used to detect for the presence of consciousness at 1 min intervals. Results. Isolated forearm responses to commands occurred in all 12 patients at some time during surgery, frequently in the absence of any significant changes in the usually monitored clinical variables. Overall, the 12 patients responded a total of 92 times during surgery. Only 41 (45%) responses were associated with an increase in the Narcotrend stage to a level suggesting consciousness (above stage CO). For the remaining responses, either there was no significant increase in the Narcotrend stage (above CO) or there was no change at all in the Narcotrend stage before, during, or after the patient responded to the taped command. Conclusions. The Narcotrend was unable to differentiate reliably between conscious and unconscious patients during general anaesthesia when neuromuscular blocking agents were used.
Accepted November 6, 2005
Clinical Investigation
The Narcotrend ‘depth of anaesthesia’ monitor cannot reliably detect consciousness during general anaesthesia: an investigation using the isolated forearm technique
I. F. Russell 1 *
I. F. Russell, E-mail: i.f.russell{at}hull.ac.uk
Abstract 
This article is accompanied by the Editorial.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Zanner, S. Pilge, E. F. Kochs, M. Kreuzer, and G. Schneider Time delay of electroencephalogram index calculation: analysis of cerebral state, bispectral, and Narcotrend indices using perioperatively recorded electroencephalographic signals Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2009; 103(3): 394 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Munte, J. Klockars, M. van Gils, A. Hiller, M. Winterhalter, C. Quandt, M. Gross, and T. Taivainen The Narcotrend Index Indicates Age-Related Changes During Propofol Induction in Children Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2009; 109(1): 53 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Rundshagen, T. Hardt, K. Cortina, F. Pragst, T. Fritzsche, and C. Spies Narcotrend-assisted propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia vs clinical practice: does it make a difference? Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2007; 99(5): 686 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. H. Davis, M. R. Coleman, A. R. Absalom, J. M. Rodd, I. S. Johnsrude, B. F. Matta, A. M. Owen, and D. K. Menon Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness PNAS, October 9, 2007; 104(41): 16032 - 16037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Smith and R. P. Mahajan Clinical neuroscience: relevance to current practice Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2007; 99(1): 1 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. E. G. Dobrunz, K. Jaeger, and G. Vetter Memory priming during light anaesthesia with desflurane and remifentanil anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2007; 98(4): 491 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Girgirah, S. M. Kinsella, and R. A. Veselis Propofol and memory. Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2006; 97(5): 746 - 748. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Bruhn, P. S. Myles, R. Sneyd, and M. M. R. F. Struys Depth of anaesthesia monitoring: what's available, what's validated and what's next? Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2006; 97(1): 85 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Narcotrend 'depth of anaesthesia' monitor cannot reliably detect consciousness during general anaesthesia: an investigation using the isolated forearm technique. Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2006; 96(6): 801 - 801. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Veselis The remarkable memory effects of propofol Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2006; 96(3): 289 - 291. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
E-letters:
Read all E-letters
- Utility does not require complete accuracy
- M Dylan Bould
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2 Mar 2006 [Full text]
- "Utility and accuracy"
- Ian F Russell
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 3 Mar 2006 [Full text]
- Narcotrend monitoring vs Propofol amnesia-what does Russel’s study document?
- Paul M Kempen
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 28 Mar 2006 [Full text]
- Re: Narcotrend monitoring vs Propofol amnesia-what does Russel’s study document?
- Ian F Russell
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2 Apr 2006 [Full text]
- Utility and accuracy
- M Dylan Bould
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 8 May 2006 [Full text]
- Recall and the Isolated Forearm Technique
- Ian F Russell
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 10 May 2006 [Full text]