Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on January 16, 2006

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aei310
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/3/335    most recent
aei310v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stonelake, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bodenham, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stonelake, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bodenham, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Accepted November 23, 2005

Clinical Investigation

The carina as a radiological landmark for central venous catheter tip position

P. A. Stonelake 1 and A. R. Bodenham 1 *

1 Department of Anaesthesia, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
A. R. Bodenham, E-mail: Andy.Bodenham{at}leedsth.nhs.uk


   Abstract

Background. Many publications, including the instructions accompanying central venous catheters, state that it is negligent to site the catheter tip in the right atrium. If the catheter tip is above the carina on a post-procedure radiograph then it is generally accepted that the catheter lies outside the right atrium. It is also recommended that the catheter tip should lie in the long axis of the superior vena cava without acute abutment to the vein wall. We performed a retrospective audit of the position of central venous catheter tips on routine post-procedure chest radiographs in intensive care unit patients, to see if these potentially conflicting requirements had been met.

Methods. We identified 213 central venous catheters suitable for analysis, within a study population of 200 consecutive cases. We measured the distance of the central venous catheter tip above or below the carina and the angle of the central venous catheter tip to the vertical (a surrogate marker for the angle of abutment of the tip to the approximately vertical superior vena cava wall).

Results. For right-sided catheters there was a high (74/163) number placed with their tips below the carina, but a very low number (4/163) with their tips at a steep (>40°) angle to the vertical. For left-sided catheters very few (7/50) were placed with their tips below the carina, but for those 43 sited above the carina most could be considered to be in suboptimal positions. This was because they were either too high and had not even crossed the midline (9), or had an acute angle (>40°) between the tip and the vertical (27).

Conclusions. We suggest that for left-sided catheters placement of the tip below the carina is more likely to result in a satisfactory placement.

Keywords: anatomy, jugular vein; complications, positional; monitoring, central venous pressure.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
H. S. Na, J. T. Kim, H. S. Kim, J. H. Bahk, C. S. Kim, and S. D. Kim
Practical anatomic landmarks for determining the insertion depth of central venous catheter in paediatric patients
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2009; 102(6): 820 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J.-H. Lee, J.-H. Bahk, H.-G. Ryu, C.-W. Jung, and Y. Jeon
Comparison of the bedside central venous catheter placement techniques: landmark vs electrocardiogram guidance
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2009; 102(5): 662 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Wirsing, C. Schummer, R. Neumann, J. Steenbeck, P. Schmidt, and W. Schummer
Is Traditional Reading of the Bedside Chest Radiograph Appropriate To Detect Intraatrial Central Venous Catheter Position?
Chest, September 1, 2008; 134(3): 527 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. M. LE. Orme, M. M. McSwiney, and R. F. O. Chamberlain-Webber
Fatal cardiac tamponade as a result of a peripherally inserted central venous catheter: a case report and review of the literature
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2007; 99(3): 384 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
H.-G. Ryu, J.-H. Bahk, J.-T. Kim, and J.-H. Lee
Bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2007; 98(2): 225 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Venkatesan, N. Sen, P. J. Korula, N. R. S. Surendrababu, J. P. Raj, P. John, and S. Christopher
Blind placements of peripherally inserted antecubital central catheters: initial catheter tip position in relation to carina
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2007; 98(1): 83 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. Sundaram, S. K. Koteeswaran, N. G. Smart, P. Stonelake, and A. Bodenham
Safe placement of central venous catheters.
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2006; 97(4): 584 - 585.
[Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Twelve and a half is luckier than thirteen?
William C Russsell, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 28 Mar 2006 [Full text]
Central venous catheter safety
Simon P Young
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 11 Sep 2006 [Full text]
The carina as a radiological landmark for detection of accidental arterial placement of left sided c
Umesh Goneppanavar, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 22 Apr 2007 [Full text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.