Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on November 25, 2005

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aei265
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/1/95    most recent
aei265v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saravanan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lyons, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saravanan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lyons, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Accepted September 24, 2005

Clinical Investigation

Equivalent dose of ephedrine and phenylephrine in the prevention of post-spinal hypotension in Caesarean section

S. Saravanan 1, M. Kocarev 2 *, R. C. Wilson 2, E. Watkins 2, M. O. Columb 3, and G. Lyons 2

1 Department of Anaesthesia, Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Road, Hull, UK
2 Department of Obstetric Anaesthesia, St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
3 Intensive Care Unit, South Manchester University Hospital, Wythenshawe, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
M. Kocarev, E-mail: mkocarev{at}yahoo.com


   Abstract

Background. Comparative studies of ephedrine and phenylephrine in prevention of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section have lacked a consensus on dose equivalence. The aim of this study was to determine the minimum vasopressor dose for each of these drugs to calculate the dose ratio for clinical equivalence in the prevention of hypotension.

Methods. Patients with a normal singleton pregnancy beyond 36 weeks gestation undergoing elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomized into two groups. The first patient in Group A received 50 mg of ephedrine in saline 0.9% w/v, 500 ml, at 999 ml h-1, the maximum rate possible on the pump and the first patient in Group B received 500 µg of phenylephrine in saline 0.9% w/v, 500 ml, at the same rate. The initial dose for dilution was an arbitrary choice. The dose of vasopressor in the saline bag for every subsequent patient was established by the efficacy of the dose in preventing hypotension in the previous patient according to the technique of up-down sequential allocation. Minimum vasopressor dose for each drug was determined according to the Dixon-Massey formula.

Results. The minimum vasopressor dose in saline 500 ml was 532.9 µg (95% CI 506.0-559.8) for phenylephrine and 43.3 mg (95% CI 39.2-47.3) for ephedrine. The concentration needed for equivalence at an infusion rate of 999 ml h-1 was 1.07 µg ml-1 for phenylephrine and 86.66 µg ml-1 for ephedrine. Mean (SD) dose used for phenylephrine was 496.45 (78.3) µg and for ephedrine 39.64 (6.33) mg.

Conclusion. This study demonstrates a potency ratio of 81.2 (95% CI 73.0-89.7) for equivalence between phenylephrine and ephedrine in prevention of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section.

Keywords: anaesthetic techniques, regional, spinal; surgery, Caesarean section; vasoconstrictor agents, ephedrine; vasoconstrictor agents, phenylephrine.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. C. Hennebry, G. M. Stocks, P. Belavadi, J. Barnes, S. Wray, M. O. Columb, and G. Lyons
Effect of i.v. phenylephrine or ephedrine on the ED50 of intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl for Caesarean section
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2009; 102(6): 806 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. D. Ngan Kee, A. Lee, K. S. Khaw, F. F. Ng, M. K. Karmakar, and T. Gin
A Randomized Double-Blinded Comparison of Phenylephrine and Ephedrine Infusion Combinations to Maintain Blood Pressure During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: The Effects on Fetal Acid-Base Status and Hemodynamic Control
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1295 - 1302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
Y. C. P. Arai, N. Kato, M. Matsura, H. Ito, N. Kandatsu, S. Kurokawa, M. Mizutani, Y. Shibata, and T. Komatsu
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation at the PC-5 and PC-6 acupoints reduced the severity of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing Caesarean section
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2008; 100(1): 78 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.