Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on July 15, 2005

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aei195
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/3/377    most recent
aei195v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shibutani, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bairamian, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shibutani, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bairamian, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journal.permissions@oupjournals.org
Accepted June 20, 2005

Clinical Investigation

Pharmacokinetic mass of fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in lean and obese patients{dagger}

K. Shibutani 1, M. A. Inchiosa Jr2*, K. Sawada 3, and M. Bairamian 1

1 Department of Anesthesiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
2 Department of Anesthesiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA; Department of Pharmacology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
3 Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
M. A. Inchiosa Jr, E-mail: mario_inchiosa{at}nymc.edu


   Abstract

Background. We previously proposed dosing weights for fentanyl, termed ‘pharmacokinetic mass’, that span the total body weight (TBW) range from 40 to 210 kg. In this study, we examined the relationships among fentanyl doses needed to achieve postoperative analgesia, corresponding plasma fentanyl concentrations, and pharmacokinetic mass in lean and obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Methods. A total of 69 patients were studied, with TBW ranging from 48 to181 kg. Fentanyl infusion was used during surgery. After surgery, fentanyl infusion rates were titrated to achieve analgesia without significant respiratory depression. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured when an apparent steady analgesic state was obtained. Comparisons were made for dosing requirements and effective plasma concentrations for 37 lean patients (body mass index <30, TBW <85 kg) and 33 obese patients (body mass index >30, TBW ≥85 kg).

Results. The average fentanyl dose (µg h-1) required to achieve and maintain analgesia over the 4 h postoperative period had a non-linear relationship to TBW; in comparison, fentanyl dose had a strong linear relationship to pharmacokinetic mass: dose (µg h-1)=1.22xpharmacokinetic mass-7.5; r = 0.741, P<0.001. Based on results from our earlier study, the corresponding values of TBW and pharmacokinetic mass are: 52 kg - 52 kg; 70 kg - 65 kg; 100 kg - 83 kg; 120 kg - 93 kg; 140 kg - 99 kg; 160 kg - 104 kg; 180 kg - 107 kg; 200 kg - 109 kg. In the group comparisons, there was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative fentanyl dose per unit of pharmacokinetic mass between lean and obese patients. The plasma concentration of fentanyl required for analgesia was approximately 1.5 ng ml-1, and was similar in the two groups.

Conclusion. The relationship between dose and pharmacokinetic mass, compared with that of dose vs TBW, may provide confidence for the use of pharmacokinetic mass as a dosing approximation for fentanyl. Fentanyl dose based on TBW may cause overdosing in obese patients.

Keywords: analgesics, fentanyl; complications, obesity; pharmacokinetics, fentanyl.
{dagger}Presented in abstract form at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Las Vegas, October 26, 2004.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
B. L. Erstad, K. Puntillo, H. C. Gilbert, M. J. Grap, D. Li, J. Medina, R. A. Mularski, C. Pasero, B. Varkey, and C. N. Sessler
Pain Management Principles in the Critically Ill
Chest, April 1, 2009; 135(4): 1075 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
D. Guss and T. Bhattacharyya
Perioperative management of the obese orthopaedic patient.
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., July 1, 2006; 14(7): 425 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.