Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on November 5, 2004

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aei023
© 2004 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/2/198    most recent
aei023v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coburn, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rossaint, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coburn, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rossaint, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Accepted September 3, 2004

Clinical Investigation

Randomized controlled trial of the haemodynamic and recovery effects of xenon or propofol anaesthesia

M. Coburn 1*, O. Kunitz 1, J.-H. Baumert 1, K. Hecker 1, S. Haaf 1, A. Zühlsdorff 1, T. Beeker 1, and R. Rossaint 1

1 Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
M. Coburn, E-mail: mcoburn{at}ukaachen.de


   Abstract

Background. There is limited clinical experience with xenon in a large number of patients. We present intra- and postoperative haemodynamic and recovery data comparing xenon and total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol.

Methods. A total of 160 patients aged 18-60 years (ASA I and II) undergoing elective surgery took part in this prospective non-blinded randomized controlled trial. After local ethics committee approval and written informed consent, patients were allocated randomly to either the xenon or the propofol group. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and remifentanil and was maintained with xenon at 60% (minimal alveolar concentration 0.95) or with propofol 0.1-0.12 mg kg-1 min-1. Remifentanil was titrated to clinical need in both groups.

Results. The two study groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, height, gender and ASA classification. Baseline in heart rate and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) were comparable in both groups. Following induction, SAP initially decreased but returned to baseline values over 15 min in the xenon group and differed significantly from the propofol group. Heart rate decreased significantly only in the xenon group and remained at stable values. Occurrence and duration of hypertension, hypotension and bradycardia showed no significant difference between groups. Patient recovery time in the post-anaesthetic care unit and recovery from anaesthesia was similar in the two groups.

Conclusions. After induction the xenon/opioid regimen maintains systolic blood pressure at baseline levels and a low heart rate. No differences between groups were found in haemodynamic stability during anaesthesia. Recovery from xenon anaesthesia was similar to that observed in the propofol group.

Keywords: anaesthetic gases, xenon; anaesthetics i.v., propofol; pharmacodynamics.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. M. Laitio, J. W. Langsjo, S. Aalto, K. K. Kaisti, E. Salmi, A. Maksimow, R. Aantaa, V. Oikonen, T. Viljanen, R. Parkkola, et al.
The Effects of Xenon Anesthesia on the Relationship Between Cerebral Glucose Metabolism and Blood Flow in Healthy Subjects: A Positron Emission Tomography Study
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2009; 108(2): 593 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. S. Pagel
Remote Exposure to Xenon Produces Delayed Preconditioning Against Myocardial Infarction In Vivo: Additional Evidence That Noble Gases Are Not Biologically Inert
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 1768 - 1771.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Lab AnimHome page
R. C E Francis, M. S Reyle-Hahn, C. Hohne, A. Klein, I. Theruvath, B. Donaubauer, T. Busch, and W. Boemke
The haemodynamic and catecholamine response to xenon/remifentanil anaesthesia in Beagle dogs
Lab Anim, July 1, 2008; 42(3): 338 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Coburn, O. Kunitz, C. C. Apfel, M. Hein, M. Fries, and R. Rossaint
Incidence of postoperative nausea and emetic episodes after xenon anaesthesia compared with propofol-based anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2008; 100(6): 787 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. Salmi, R. M. Laitio, S. Aalto, A. T. Maksimow, J. W. Langsjo, K. K. Kaisti, R. Aantaa, V. Oikonen, L. Metsahonkala, K. Nagren, et al.
Xenon Does Not Affect {gamma}-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor Binding in Humans
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 129 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Coburn, J.-H. Baumert, D. Roertgen, V. Thiel, M. Fries, M. Hein, O. Kunitz, B. Fimm, and R. Rossaint
Emergence and early cognitive function in the elderly after xenon or desflurane anaesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2007; 98(6): 756 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
L.S. Rasmussen, W. Schmehl, and J. Jakobsson
Comparison of xenon with propofol for supplementary general anaesthesia for knee replacement: a randomized study
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2006; 97(2): 154 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. Hanss, B. Bein, P. Turowski, E. Cavus, M. Bauer, M. Andretzke, M. Steinfath, J. Scholz, and P. H. Tonner
The influence of xenon on regulation of the autonomic nervous system in patients at high risk of perioperative cardiac complications
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2006; 96(4): 427 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.