Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on September 17, 2004
British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aeh272
© 2004 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/6/810    most recent
aeh272v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gredell, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pearce, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gredell, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pearce, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Accepted July 22, 2004

Laboratory Investigation

Determination of diffusion and partition coefficients of propofol in rat brain tissue: implications for studies of drug action in vitro

J. A. Gredell 1, P. A. Turnquist 2, M. B. MacIver 2, and R. A. Pearce 1*

1 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
2 Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University, California, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rapearce{at}wisc.edu.


  Abstract

Background. Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is a widely used general anaesthetic that modulates {gamma}-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors, the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptor in the brain. Previous studies have found that the concentration of propofol that is required to affect synaptic inhibition in brain slices is much higher than the free concentration that is achieved clinically and that modulates isolated receptors. We tested whether this is accounted for by slow equilibration in brain tissue, and determined the concentration that must be applied to achieve appropriate brain levels.

Methods. Rat brain slices 300-µm thick were placed in a solution of 100 µM propofol in artificial cerebrospinal fluid for times ranging from 7.5 to 480 min. Concentrations in these slices were measured by HPLC to determine diffusion and partition coefficients. Electrophysiological measurements of the rate at which effects of 5 µM propofol developed were compared with the calculated rate of increase in tissue concentration.

Results. The diffusion coefficient was approximately 0.02x10-6 cm2 s-1, and the brain:artificial cerebrospinal fluid partition coefficient was 36. Diffusion times in brain slices agreed well with time course measurements of propofol-induced depression of synaptic responses, which continued to increase over 5 h. This depression was reversed by blocking GABA inhibition with picrotoxin (100 µM).

Conclusions. Propofol does enhance inhibition in brain slices at a concentration of 0.63 µM in the superfusate, which produces brain concentrations corresponding with those achieved in vivo, but equilibration requires several hours. It is likely that slow diffusion to GABA receptors accounts for the high concentrations (>10 µM) that were needed to depress evoked responses in previous investigations.

Keywords: anaesthetics, i.v., propofol; pharmacokinetics, propofol; brain, GABA; brain, hippocampus; measurement techniques, electrophysiology.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
K. Kubo, K. Nishikawa, M. Hardy-Yamada, J. Ishizeki, Y. Yanagawa, and S. Saito
Altered Responses to Propofol, but Not Ketamine, in Mice Deficient in the 65-Kilodalton Isoform of Glutamate Decarboxylase
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2009; 329(2): 592 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Y. Zecharia, L. E. Nelson, T. C. Gent, M. Schumacher, R. Jurd, U. Rudolph, S. G. Brickley, M. Maze, and N. P. Franks
The Involvement of Hypothalamic Sleep Pathways in General Anesthesia: Testing the Hypothesis Using the GABAA Receptor {beta}3N265M Knock-In Mouse
J. Neurosci., February 18, 2009; 29(7): 2177 - 2187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. P. Archer and S. H. Roth
Low Concentrations of Pentobarbital Enhance Excitability of Rat Hippocampal Neurons
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 993 - 997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. R. Drasbek, K. Hoestgaard-Jensen, and K. Jensen
Modulation of Extrasynaptic THIP Conductances by GABAA-Receptor Modulators in Mouse Neocortex
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 2293 - 2300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
K. K. Kandimalla, G. L. Curran, S. S. Holasek, E. J. Gilles, T. M. Wengenack, M. Ramirez-Alvarado, and J. F. Poduslo
Physiological and Biophysical Factors That Influence Alzheimer's Disease Amyloid Plaque Targeting of Native and Putrescine Modified Human Amyloid beta40
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2006; 318(1): 17 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
S. Becker and X. Liu
EVALUATION OF THE UTILITY OF BRAIN SLICE METHODS TO STUDY BRAIN PENETRATION
Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2006; 34(5): 855 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
V. Y. Cheng, L. J. Martin, E. M. Elliott, J. H. Kim, H. T. J. Mount, F. A. Taverna, J. C. Roder, J. F. MacDonald, A. Bhambri, N. Collinson, et al.
Alpha5GABAA receptors mediate the amnestic but not sedative-hypnotic effects of the general anesthetic etomidate.
J. Neurosci., April 5, 2006; 26(14): 3713 - 3720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
X. Chen, S. Shu, and D. A. Bayliss
Suppression of Ih Contributes to Propofol-Induced Inhibition of Mouse Cortical Pyramidal Neurons
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 3872 - 3883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.