Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on September 17, 2004

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aeh268
© 2004 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/6/799    most recent
aeh268v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chia, Y. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chia, Y. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Accepted July 23, 2004

Clinical Investigation

Role of {beta}-blockade in anaesthesia and postoperative pain management after hysterectomy

Y. Y. Chia 1*, M. H. Chan 1, N. H. Ko 1, and K. Liu 1

1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, and School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, 386, Ta-Chung First Road, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: yychia{at}isca.vghks.gov.tw.


   Abstract

Background. Perioperative use of {beta}-blockers has been advocated as a strategy to prevent cardiac sequelae. This study evaluated the influence of perioperative esmolol administration upon anaesthesia and postoperative pain management amongst patients undergoing hysterectomy.

Methods. Ninety-seven ASA I-II patients, undergoing abdominal total hysterectomy, were randomly divided into one of two groups. Patients in the Esmolol group received an i.v. loading dose of esmolol 0.5 mg kg-1 followed by infusion of 0.05 mg kg-1 min-1 before anaesthesia induction. The infusion was documented at the completion of surgery. The Control group received a volume of normal saline. After surgery, all patients were treated with patient-controlled i.v. analgesia (PCA), which was programmed to deliver 1 mg of morphine on demand for 3 consecutive days. Pain intensity on movement and at rest, sedation score, and side effects were recorded.

Results. The two groups were comparable with respect to their characteristics. Patients in the esmolol group received significantly lower end-tidal isoflurane concentrations (1.0 (0.3) vs 1.4 (0.5)%, respectively; P<0.001) and fentanyl (0.9 (0.2) vs 1.2 (0.5) µg kg-1, respectively; P=0.006) during anaesthesia. They also showed a reduced heart rate and arterial pressure response to tracheal intubation, skin incision, and tracheal extubation. The Esmolol group consumed less PCA morphine in 3 days (37.3 (8.4) vs 54.7 (11.2) mg, respectively; P=0.005). Pain intensity and medication side effects were similar in the two groups.

Conclusion. The results suggest that perioperative esmolol administration during anaesthesia reduces the intraoperative use of inhalation anaesthetic and fentanyl, decreases haemodynamic responses, and reduced morphine consumption for the first 3 postoperative days.

Keywords: analgesia, patient-controlled; analgesia, postoperative; pain, postoperative; sympathetic nervous system, {beta}-antagonist, esmolol.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. G. Stone, H. J. Khambatta, J. W. Sear, and P. Foex
Beta-Blockers: Must We Throw the Baby Out with the Bath Water?
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2009; 108(6): 1987 - 1990.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Kawaguchi, I. Takamatsu, K. Masui, and T. Kazama
Effect of landiolol on bispectral index and spectral entropy responses to tracheal intubation during propofol anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2008; 101(2): 273 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Kurita, K. Takata, K. Morita, and S. Sato
Lipophilic {beta}-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol increases the hypnotic and anti-nociceptive effects of isoflurane in a swine model
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2008; 100(6): 841 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Ozturk, H. Kaya, G. Aran, M. Aksun, and S. Savaci
Postoperative beneficial effects of esmolol in treated hypertensive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2008; 100(2): 211 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
V. Collard, G. Mistraletti, A. Taqi, J. F. Asenjo, L. S. Feldman, G. M. Fried, and F. Carli
Intraoperative Esmolol Infusion in the Absence of Opioids Spares Postoperative Fentanyl in Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2007; 105(5): 1255 - 1262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White, H. Kehlet, J. M. Neal, T. Schricker, D. B. Carr, F. Carli, and the Fast-Track Surgery Study Group
The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1380 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. Ahonen, R. Jokela, K. Uutela, and M. Huiku
Surgical stress index reflects surgical stress in gynaecological laparoscopic day-case surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2007; 98(4): 456 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T.-F. Lin, Y.-C. Yeh, Y.-H. Yen, Y.-P. Wang, C.-J. Lin, and W.-Z. Sun
Antiemetic and analgesic-sparing effects of diphenhydramine added to morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 835 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.