Skip Navigation



BJA Advance Access published online on February 6, 2004

British Journal of Anaesthesia, doi:10.1093/bja/aeh097
© 2004 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/4/532    most recent
aeh097v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schubert, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Moser, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schubert, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Moser, P. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Accepted June 29, 2003

Clinical Investigation

Testing of a new pneumatic device to cause pain in humans

H. M. Schubert 1*, I. H. Lorenz 2, F. Zschiegner 2, C. Kremser 3, M. Hohlrieder 2, M. Biebl 4, C. Kolbitsch 2, P. L. Moser 5

1 Department of Trauma Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
2 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
3 Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
4 Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
5 Department of Pathology, University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: heinrich.schubert{at}uibk.ac.at.


   Abstract

Background. Surgical pain typically combines superficial and deep pain. We wished to generate pain that resembled surgical pain, reliably and reproducibly, in volunteers.

Methods. We constructed a computer-controlled pneumatic device to apply pressure to the anterior tibia. The reproducibility of the pain was tested by rating the pressure that caused pain rated 4-5 on a visual analogue scale (VAS) on days 0, 7, and 24 in 10 volunteers. The effect of remifentanil (0.025, 0.05, 0.075, and 0.1 µg kg-1 min-1) on pain tolerance in another set of volunteers (n=11) was used as an indirect measure of the reliability of pain production.

Results. The pressure needed (0.7 (0.3) to 0.9 (0.4) atm (mean (SD)) to induce pain rated 4-5 (VAS) did not vary, showing long-term reproducibility of the method. When pressure was applied to cause increasing pain in volunteers (n=11) 0.05 µg kg-1 min-1 remifentanil increased pain tolerance by 50%. An approximate doubling of the dose (0.1 µg kg-1 min-1) increased pain tolerance significantly more. The linear logarithmic dose-effect relationship shows that the device causes pain reliably, and this can be reduced with opioid treatment.

Conclusion. This pneumatic device can apply pain reliably and reproducibly.

Br J Anaesth 2004

Keywords: Keywords: analgesics opioid, remifentanil; pain, experimental; pain, stimulus; pain, tolerance; volunteers


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
I. H. Lorenz, K. Egger, H. Schubert, C. Schnurer, W. Tiefenthaler, M. Hohlrieder, M. F. Schocke, C. Kremser, R. Esterhammer, A. Ischebeck, et al.
Lornoxicam characteristically modulates cerebral pain-processing in human volunteers: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2008; 100(6): 827 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.