Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 99(5):745-746; doi:10.1093/bja/aem284
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bein, B.
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bein, B.
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Validation of pulse contour derived stroke volume variation

B. Bein*, J. Renner, P. Meybohm and J. Scholz

Kiel, Germany

* E-mail: bein@anaesthesie.uni-kiel.de

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Editor—We read the article by Dr Kubitz and colleagues reporting their results comparing stroke volume variation (SVV) derived by different methods of SV determination with great interest.1 The authors should be commended for this study, that for the first time compared SVV derived from the widely used PiCCO monitor (Pulsion . . . [Full Text of this Article]

J. C. Kubitz1 and D. A. Reuter2,*

1 Munich, Germany
2 Hamburg, Germany

* E-mail: dreuter@uke.uni-hamburg.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?