Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 99(1):49-60; doi:10.1093/bja/aem141
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coles, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coles, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Imaging after brain injury

J. P. Coles*

University Department of Anaesthesia, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Box 93, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK

* E-mail: jpc44{at}wbic.cam.ac.uk

Head injury remains an important cause of death and disability in young adults. This review will discuss the role of structural imaging using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and physiological imaging using CT perfusion, 131Xe CT, MRI and spectroscopy (MRS), single photon emission computed tomography, and positron emission tomography (PET) in the assessment, management, and prediction of outcome after head injury. CT allows rapid assessment of brain pathology which ensures patients who require urgent surgical intervention receive appropriate care. Although MRI provides greater spatial resolution, particularly within the posterior fossa and deep white matter, a complete assessment of the burden of injury requires imaging of cerebral physiology. Physiological imaging techniques can only provide ‘snap shots’ of physiology within the injured brain, but they can be repeated, and such data can be used to assess the impact of therapeutic interventions. Perfusion imaging based on CT techniques (xenon CT and CT perfusion) can be implemented easily in most hospital centres, and provide quantitative perfusion data in addition to structural images. PET imaging provides unparalleled insights into cerebral physiology and pathophysiology, but is not widely available and is primarily a research tool. MR technology continues to develop and is becoming generally available. Using a complex variety of sequences, MR can provide data concerning both structural and physiological derangements. Future developments with such imaging techniques should improve understanding of the pathophysiology of brain injury and provide data that should improve management and prediction of functional outcome.

Keywords: brain, blood flow; brain, ischaemia; brain, magnetic resonance imaging; brain, metabolism; brain, oxygen metabolism; head, injury


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.