Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 99(1):145-146; doi:10.1093/bja/aem153
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, R.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, R.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparison of patient-controlled epidural infusion with nurse-administered epidural infusion

R. Chambers

Winchester, UK

E-mail: rob.chambers@dsl.pipex.com

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Editor—I read with interest the study comparing patient-controlled epidural infusion with nurse-administered epidural infusion for patients undergoing colonic resection.1 The authors correctly identify that the four-point verbal rating scale (VRS) used to assess postoperative pain would . . . [Full Text of this Article]

J. J. Nightingale* and B. Higgins

Portsmouth, UK

* E-mail: jeremy.nightingale@porthosp.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?