Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 99(1):1-3; doi:10.1093/bja/aem169
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahajan, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahajan, R. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Clinical neuroscience: relevance to current practice

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The last decade has seen a rapid expansion of our knowledge in clinical neuroscience. These developments are of relevance to everyone working in anaesthesia and intensive care because of the changes that they have brought to the management of common neurological conditions such as head injury, subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and stroke. This postgraduate issue of the British Journal of Anaesthesia is dedicated to clinical neuroscience and its relevance to current elective and acute clinical practice. The reviews are written by acknowledged experts in their field and present the latest evidence for current clinical practice and identify new developments that are likely to direct future practice.

There are new challenges facing anaesthetists as neurosurgical practice evolves. Controversies regarding the provision of anaesthesia for intracranial neurosurgery remain, with no ideal technique identified.1 The ‘local’ vs . . . [Full Text of this Article]

M. Smith1 and R. P. Mahajan2,*

1 Department of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care
The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery
University College London Hospitals
Queen Square
London WC1 N 3BG
UK
2 University Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Queen's Medical Centre
Nottingham NG7 2UH
UK

* Corresponding author E-mail: ravi.mahajan@nottingham.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?