Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 98(5):591-597; doi:10.1093/bja/aem062
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kubitz, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kubitz, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Validation of pulse contour derived stroke volume variation during modifications of cardiac afterload

J. C. Kubitz1,2,3, T. Annecke1,2, S. Forkl2, G. I. Kemming1,2, N. Kronas2, A. E. Goetz3,{dagger} and D. A. Reuter3,*,{dagger}

1 Department of Anesthesiology
2 Institute for Surgical Research, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
3 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg-Eppendorf University-Hospital, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany

* Corresponding author. E-mail: dreuter{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de

Background: Left ventricular stroke volume variation (SVV) or its surrogates are useful tools to assess fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. So far it is unknown, how changes in cardiac afterload affect SVV. Therefore, this study compared left ventricular SVV derived by pulse contour analysis with SVV measured using an ultrasonic flow probe and investigated the influence of cardiac afterload on left ventricular SVV.

Methods: In 13 anaesthetized, mechanically ventilated pigs [31(SD 6) kg], we compared cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), and SVV determined by pulse contour analysis and by an ultrasonic aortic flow signal (Bland–Altman analysis). After obtaining baseline measurements, cardiac afterload was increased using phenylephrine and decreased using adenosine (both continuously administered). Measurements were performed with a constant tidal volume (12 ml kg–1) without PEEP.

Results: Neither increasing mean arterial pressure (MAP) [from 59 (7) to 116 (19)] nor decreasing MAP [from 63 (7) to 39 (4)] affected CO, SV, and SVV (both methods). Method comparison revealed a bias for SVV of 0.1% [standard error of the mean (SE) 0.8] at baseline, –1.2% (SE 0.8) during decreased and 4.0% (SE 0.7) during increased afterload, the latter being significantly different from the others (P < 0.05). Thereby, pulse contour analysis tended to underestimate SVV during decreased afterload and to overestimate SVV during increased afterload. Limits of agreement were approximately 6% for all points of measurement.

Conclusions: Left ventricular SVV is not affected by changes in cardiac afterload. There is a good agreement of pulse contour with flow derived SVV. The agreement decreases, if afterload is extensively augmented.

Keywords: heart, cardiac afterload, positive end-expiratory pressure; heart, cardiac preload; heart, stroke volume variation, validation


{dagger} Declaration of interest. A.E.G. and D.A.R. are members of the medical advisory board of Pulsion Medical Systems. This study was exclusively supported by a research grant of the University of Munich.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. Lahner, B. Kabon, C. Marschalek, A. Chiari, G. Pestel, A. Kaider, E. Fleischmann, and H. Hetz
Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2009; 103(3): 346 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. J. Funk, E. W. Moretti, and T. J. Gan
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in the Perioperative Setting
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2009; 108(3): 887 - 897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. L. Ryan, W. H. Cooke, C. A. Rickards, K. G. Lurie, and V. A. Convertino
Breathing through an inspiratory threshold device improves stroke volume during central hypovolemia in humans
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2008; 104(5): 1402 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
B. Bein, J. Renner, P. Meybohm, J. Scholz, J. C. Kubitz, and D. A. Reuter
Validation of pulse contour derived stroke volume variation
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2007; 99(5): 745 - 746.
[Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

VALIDATION OF PULSE CONTOUR DERIVED STROKE VOLUME VARIATION
Berthold Bein, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 19 Jul 2007 [Full text]
Response to the letter of Dr. Bein
Daniel A. Reuter, et al.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 14 Aug 2007 [Full text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.