Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007 98(2):183-188; doi:10.1093/bja/ael345
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sloth, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sloth, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Propofol reduces tissue-Doppler markers of left ventricle function: a transthoracic echocardiographic study

J. R. Larsen1,2,*, P. Torp1, K. Norrild1 and E. Sloth1

1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care
2 Department of Experimental and Clinical Research, Skejby Sygehus, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark

* Corresponding author: Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, and Department of Experimental and Clinical Research, Skejby Sygehus, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. E-mail: jens.rolighed{at}dadlnet.dk

BACKGROUND: Propofol is thought to minimally depress myocardial function, but mainly to reduce blood pressure by vasodilation. Transthoracic tissue-Doppler echocardiography (TDE) is a novel, validated method of quantifying myocardial function. It provides new insight into myocardial function by measuring myocardial motion. We examined the effects of propofol upon myocardial function by measuring changes in left ventricle function by TDE.

METHODS: We assessed change in myocardial function in propofol anaesthetized ASA I patients tissue tracking displacement (TTD) before anaesthesia onset and repeated measurements after a single propofol bolus dose. Tissue tracking score (TTS), a marker of ejection fraction, was also used (n = 10).

RESULTS: Propofol 1.5–2 mg kg–1 significantly attenuated PSV from 5.64 (1.17) to 4.66 (0.55) cm s–1 (P < 0.0001) and TTD from 10.2 (2.1) to 8.5 (1.4) mm (P = 0.0091), whereas TTP was unchanged [all data: mean (SD)]. TTS declined from 7.2 (1.3) to 6.1 (0.6) mm (P < 0.01). Non-invasive mean blood pressure declined 17% (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that myocardial contractile function is compromised concomitantly with reduced cyclic displacement after propofol dosing. Blood pressure declined accordingly. From these results, it is impossible to ascertain whether this was secondary to reduced cardiac filling or a consequence of a direct negative inotropic action of propofol, but it represents a left-shift of the Starling curve. The novel TDE yields new information on myocardial velocities and motion.

Keywords: anaesthesia, general; anaesthetics i.v., propofol; heart, myocardial function; monitoring techniques, transthoracic echocardiography, tissue Doppler


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
E. A. ten Brinke, R. J. Klautz, S. A. Tulner, F. H. Engbers, H. F. Verwey, D. E. Atsma, M. J. Schalij, E. E. van der Wall, J. J. Bax, H. Putter, et al.
Haemodynamics and left ventricular function in heart failure patients: Comparison of awake versus intra-operative conditions
Eur J Heart Fail, May 1, 2008; 10(5): 467 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.