Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on May 23, 2006
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 97(2):232-237; doi:10.1093/bja/ael116
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/2/232    most recent
ael116v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomasy, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomasy, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, S. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The effects of i.v. fentanyl administration on the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in horses

S. M. Thomasy1, E. P. Steffey2,*, K. R. Mama3, A. Solano2 and S. D. Stanley1

1 K.L. Maddy Equine Analytical Chemistry Laboratory, California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, University of California Davis, CA 95616, USA.
2 Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, CA 95616, USA.
3 Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA

*Corresponding author. E-mail: epsteffey{at}ucdavis.edu

Background. Fentanyl decreases the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhaled anaesthetics and has been used clinically to reduce the requirements of other anaesthetic drugs in humans and small animals. We hypothesized that i.v. fentanyl would decrease the MAC of isoflurane in horses in a dose-dependent manner.

Methods. Following determination of baseline MAC of isoflurane, fentanyl was administered i.v. to target plasma concentrations of 1, 8 and 16 ng ml–1. Each horse was randomly assigned two of three target concentrations administered in ascending order. Loading and infusion doses for each horse were determined from previously derived individual pharmacokinetic values. Isoflurane MAC determination began 45 min after fentanyl administration at each target fentanyl concentration. Venous blood was collected at fixed intervals during the infusion for measurement of plasma fentanyl concentrations.

Results. Mean actual fentanyl plasma concentrations were 0 (baseline), and 0.72 (SD 0.26), 8.43 (3.22), and 13.31 (6.66) ng ml–1 for the target concentrations of 1, 8 and 16 ng ml–1, respectively. The corresponding isoflurane MAC values were a baseline of 1.57 (0.23), and 1.51 (0.24), 1.41 (0.23) and 1.37 (0.09)%, respectively. The fentanyl concentrations of 0.72 and 8.43 ng ml–1 did not significantly alter the MAC of isoflurane, but an 18 (7)% ISO-MAC reduction was observed at the 13.31 ng ml–1 concentration.

Conclusions. These results cautiously encourage further study of fentanyl as an opioid anaesthetic adjunct to inhalant anaesthesia in horses.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.