BJA Advance Access originally published online on May 23, 2006
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 97(2):200-207; doi:10.1093/bja/ael121
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Epidural catheter placement in children: comparing a novel approach using ultrasound guidance and a standard loss-of-resistance technique
1 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna 1090 Vienna., Austria
2 Department of Anaesthesia, University of Cape Town, Red Cross Children's Hospital Klipfontein Road, Rondebosch 7700, Cape Town, South Africa
3 Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Gersthof Orthopedic Hospital 1180 Vienna, Austria
*Corresponding author: Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 1820, A-1090 Vienna. E-mail: peter.marhofer{at}meduniwien.ac.at
Background. We report a prospective, randomized study to evaluate ultrasound guidance for epidural catheter placement in children 06 yr of age.
Methods. Epidural catheters were placed at lumbar or thoracic cord levels in 64 children undergoing major surgery, using either ultrasonography or loss-of-resistance (LOR) for guidance. Using a 510 MHz linear ultrasound probe, the neuraxial structures were identified, the skin-epidural depth and epidural space was measured, the advancing epidural catheter visualized, and the spread of local anaesthetic verifying catheter position was confirmed. Epidural placement procedures were analysed for bone contacts and speed of execution. Children under 6 months were analysed separately.
Results. Epidural placement involved bone contacts in 17% of children in the ultrasound group and 71% of children in the LOR group (P<0.0001). Epidurals were executed more swiftly in the ultrasound group [162 (75) s vs 234 (138) s; P<0.01]. Children under 6 months revealed a 0.9 correlation between skin-epidural depth and body weight.
Conclusions. Ultrasonography is a useful aid to verify epidural placement of local anaesthetic agents and epidural catheters in children. Advantages include a reduction in bone contacts, faster epidural placement, direct visualization of neuraxial structures and the spread of local anaesthetic inside the epidural space. Ultrasound guidance requires additional training and good manual skills, and should only be used once experience in ultrasound-guided techniques of regional anaesthesia has been acquired.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Marhofer and V. W. S. Chan Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: Current Concepts and Future Trends Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1265 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Hopkins Ultrasound guidance as a gold standard in regional anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2007; 98(3): 299 - 301. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
E-letters:
Read all E-letters
- Ultrasound guided epidural catheter placement in children without test dose may be unsafe.
- Baljit Singh, et al.
- British Journal of Anaesthesia, 15 Nov 2006 [Full text]

