BJA Advance Access originally published online on February 13, 2006
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 96(4):418-426; doi:10.1093/bja/ael020
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
1Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Alfred Hospital Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
2Academic Board of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University Victoria 3800, Australia
3Centre for Clinical Research Excellence Canberra, Australia
4Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Hospital Heidelberg, Australia
*Corresponding author: Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The Alfred Hospital, PO Box 315, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. E-mail: p.myles{at}alfred.org.au
Epidural analgesia is considered by many to be the best method of pain relief after major surgery. It is used routinely in many thoracic surgery centres. Although effective, side-effects include hypotension, urinary retention, incomplete (or failed) block, and, in rare cases, paraplegia. Paravertebral block (PVB) is an alternative technique that may offer comparable analgesic effectiveness and a better side-effect profile. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of all relevant randomized trials comparing PVB with epidural analgesia in thoracic surgery. Data were abstracted and verified by both authors. Studies were tested for heterogeneity, and meta-analyses were done with random effects or fixed effects models. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was used for numerical outcomes and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes, both with 95% CI.
We identified 10 trials that had enrolled 520 thoracic surgery patients. All of the trials were small (n<130) and none were blinded. There was no significant difference between PVB and epidural groups for pain scores at 4–8, 24 or 48 h, WMD 0.37 (95% CI: –0.5, 121), 0.05 (–0.6, 0.7), –0.04 (–0.4, 0.3), respectively. Pulmonary complications occurred less often with PVB, OR 0.36 (0.14, 0.92). Urinary retention, OR 0.23 (0.10, 0.51), nausea and vomiting, OR 0.47 (0.24, 0.53), and hypotension, OR 0.23 (0.11, 0.48), were less common with PVB. Rates of failed block were lower in the PVB group, OR 0.28 (0.2, 0.6). PVB and epidural analgesia provide comparable pain relief after thoracic surgery, but PVB has a better side-effect profile and is associated with a reduction in pulmonary complications. PVB can be recommended for major thoracic surgery.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Kotze, A. Scally, and S. Howell Efficacy and safety of different techniques of paravertebral block for analgesia after thoracotomy: a systematic review and metaregression Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2009; 103(5): 626 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Ben-Ari, M. Moreno, J. E. Chelly, and P. E. Bigeleisen Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block Using an Intercostal Approach Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1691 - 1694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Ji, J. Niu, Y. Shi, L. Hou, Y. Lu, and L. Xiong The Effectiveness of Repetitive Paravertebral Injections with Local Anesthetics and Steroids for the Prevention of Postherpetic Neuralgia in Patients with Acute Herpes Zoster Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1651 - 1655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Garutti, F. Gonzalez-Aragoneses, M. T. Biencinto, E. Novoa, C. Simon, N. Moreno, P. Cruz, and C. Benito Thoracic paravertebral block after thoracotomy: comparison of three different approaches Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 35(5): 829 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Elsayed and M. Poullis Should paravertebral analgesia be used to fast track patients after thoracic surgery? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 35(1): 188 - 188. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. P. Joshi, F. Bonnet, R. Shah, R. C. Wilkinson, F. Camu, B. Fischer, E. A. M. Neugebauer, N. Rawal, S. A. Schug, C. Simanski, et al. A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials Evaluating Regional Techniques for Postthoracotomy Analgesia Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 1026 - 1040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Burns, B. Ben-David, J. E. Chelly, and J. E. Greensmith Intercostally Placed Paravertebral Catheterization: An Alternative Approach to Continuous Paravertebral Blockade Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2008; 107(1): 339 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. H. Geerts, D. Bergqvist, G. F. Pineo, J. A. Heit, C. M. Samama, M. R. Lassen, and C. W. Colwell Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 381S - 453S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W C Culp, M N Payne, and M L Montgomery Thoracic paravertebral block for analgesia following liver mass radiofrequency ablation Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2008; 81(961): e23 - e25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. S. Liu and C. L. Wu The Effect of Analgesic Technique on Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Including Analgesia: A Systematic Review Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 789 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. McGovern, C. Walker, F. Cox, A. Ng, and J. Swanevelder Pain relief after thoracotomy Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2007; 98(6): 844 - 845. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Ng and J. Swanevelder Pain relief after thoracotomy: is epidural analgesia the optimal technique? Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2007; 98(2): 159 - 162. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|