Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on November 25, 2005
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 96(2):247-252; doi:10.1093/bja/aei291
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/2/247    most recent
aei291v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seyhan, T. O.
Right arrow Articles by Akpir, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seyhan, T. O.
Right arrow Articles by Akpir, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Effects of three different dose regimens of magnesium on propofol requirements, haemodynamic variables and postoperative pain relief in gynaecological surgery

T. O. Seyhan1,*, M. Tugrul1, M. O. Sungur2, S. Kayacan1, L. Telci1, K. Pembeci1 and K. Akpir1

1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Turkey. 2 Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA

* Corresponding author. I.U. Istanbul Tip Fakültesi Anesteziyoloji Anabilim Dali, Cerrahi Bilimler Binasi, Çapa 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Türkiye. E-mail: tulay2000{at}e-kolay.net

Background. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study we compared the effects of three different dose regimens of magnesium on intraoperative propofol and atracurium requirements, and postoperative morphine consumption in patients undergoing gynaecological surgery.

Methods. Eighty women were allocated to four equal groups. The control group received normal saline; magnesium groups received 40 mg kg–1 of magnesium before induction of anaesthesia, followed by i.v. infusion of normal saline, magnesium 10 mg kg–1 h–1 or magnesium 20 mg kg–1 h–1 for the next 4 h. Propofol infusion was targeted to keep bispectral index values between 45 and 55. Postoperative analgesia was achieved using PCA with morphine.

Results. Magnesium groups required significantly less propofol [mean (SD) 121.5 (13.3), 102.2 (8.0) and 101.3 (9.7) µg kg–1 min–1 respectively] than the control group (140.7 (16.5) µg kg–1 min–1). Atracurium use was significantly higher in the control group than magnesium groups [0.4 (0.06) vs 0.34 (0.06), 0.35 (0.04), 0.34 (0.06) mg kg–1 h–1 respectively]. Morphine consumption was significantly higher in control group than magnesium groups on the first postoperative day [0.88 (0.14) vs 0.73 (0.17), 0.59 (0.23), 0.53 (0.21) mg kg–1 respectively]. The heart rate was lower in magnesium groups and 20 mg kg–1 h–1 infusion group demonstrated the lowest values.

Conclusion. Magnesium 40 mg kg–1 bolus followed by 10 mg kg–1 h–1 infusion leads to significant reductions in intraoperative propofol, atracurium and postoperative morphine consumption. Increasing magnesium dosage did not offer any advantages, but induced haemodynamic consequences.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.