Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on November 18, 2005
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006 96(1):44-47; doi:10.1093/bja/aei273
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/1/44    most recent
aei273v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Normalization of acceleromyographic train-of-four ratio by baseline value for detecting residual neuromuscular block

T. Suzuki*, N. Fukano, O. Kitajima, S. Saeki and S. Ogawa

Department of Anesthesiology, Surugadai Nihon University Hospital, 1-8-13, Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo 101-8309, Japan

* Corresponding author. 3-24-3, Asagaya-Kita, Suginami-Ku, Tokyo 166-0001, Japan. E-mail: suzukit{at}cd5.so-net.ne.jp

Background. This study was designed to recognize the importance of normalizing postoperative acceleromyographic train-of-four (TOF) ratio by the baseline TOF value obtained before neuromuscular block for ensuring adequate recovery of neuromuscular function.

Methods. In 120 patients, TOF responses of the adductor pollicis to the ulnar nerve stimulation were monitored by acceleromyography (AMG) during anaesthesia using propofol, fentanyl and nitrous oxide. Control TOF stimuli were administered for 30 min. A TOF ratio measured at the end of control stimulation was regarded as a baseline value. Neuromuscular block was induced with vecuronium 0.1 mg kg–1 and was allowed to recover spontaneously. Duration to a TOF ratio of 0.9 as calculated by AMG (DUR-raw 0.9) was compared with that of 0.9 as corrected by the baseline TOF ratio (i.e. 0.9xbaseline TOF ratio; DUR-real 0.9).

Results. Baseline TOF ratios ranged from 0.95 to 1.47. The average TOF ratios observed every 5 min were constant throughout control stimulation from at time zero mean (SD) [range]; 1.11 (0.09) [0.94–1.42] to at 30 min 1.13 (0.11) [0.95–1.47]. The DUR-real 0.9 was 91.0 (18.0) [51.3–131.0] min and was significantly longer than the DUR-raw 0.9 (81.2 (16.3) [41.3–123.0] min).

Conclusions. Baseline TOF ratios measured by AMG are usually more than 1.0 and vary widely among patients. Therefore a TOF ratio of 0.9 displayed postoperatively on AMG does not always represent adequate recovery of neuromuscular function and should be normalized by baseline value to reliably detect residual paralysis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Suzuki, H. Mizutani, K. Ishikawa, E. Miyake, S. Saeki, and S. Ogawa
Epidurally administered mepivacaine delays recovery of train-of-four ratio from vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2007; 99(5): 721 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Suzuki, G. Masaki, and S. Ogawa
Neostigmine-induced reversal of vecuronium in normal weight, overweight and obese female patients
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2006; 97(2): 160 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Normalization to detect Residual paralysis?
Thomas Fuchs-Buder
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 10 May 2006 [Full text]

Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.