Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on August 12, 2005
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005 95(4):524-529; doi:10.1093/bja/aei218
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/4/524    most recent
aei218v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chalkiadis, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chalkiadis, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journal.permissions@oupjournals.org


REGIONAL ANAESTHESIA

Pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine after caudal epidural administration in infants less than 3 months of age

G. A. Chalkiadis1, B. J. Anderson2, M. Tay1,3, A. Bjorksten1 and J. J. Kelly1,*

1 Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Rd, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. 2 Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, New Zealand 3 Present address: Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore

* Corresponding author. E-mail: julian.kelly{at}rch.org.au

Background. There are few data describing levobupivacaine pharmacokinetics in infants (<3 months) after caudal administration.

Methods. An open-label study was undertaken to examine the pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine 2.5 mg ml–1, 2 mg kg–1 in children aged less than 3 months after single-shot caudal epidural administration. Plasma concentrations were determined at intervals from 0.5 to 4 h after injection. A population pharmacokinetic analysis of levobupivacaine time–concentration profiles (84 observations) from 22 infants with mean postnatal age (PNA) 2.0 (range 0.6–2.9) months was undertaken using non-linear mixed effects models (NONMEM). Time–concentration profiles were analysed using a one-compartment model with first-order input and first-order elimination. Estimates were standardized to a 70 kg adult using allometric size models.

Results. Population parameter estimates (between-subject variability) for total levobupivacaine were clearance (CLt) 12.8 [coefficient of variation (CV) 50.6%] litre h–1 70 kg–1, volume of distribution (Vt) 202 (CV 31.6%) litre 70 kg–1, absorption half-life (Tabs) 0.323 (CV 18.6%) h 70 kg–1. Estimates for the unbound drug were clearance (CLfree) 104 (CV 43.5%) litre h–1 70 kg–1, volume of distribution (Vfree) 1700 (CV 44.9%) litre 70 kg–1, absorption half-life (Tabsfree) 0.175 (CV 83.7%) h 70 kg–1. There was no effect attributable to PNA on CL or V. Time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) was 0.82 (CV 18%) h. Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was 0.69 (CV 25%) µg ml–1 for total levobupivacaine and 0.09 (CV 37%) µg ml–1 for unbound levobupivacaine.

Conclusions. Clearance in infants is approximately half that described in adults, suggesting immaturity of P450 CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 enzyme isoforms that metabolize levobupivacaine in infants. This lower clearance delays Tmax, which was noted to occur approximately 50 min after administration of caudal epidural levobupivacaine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.