Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on July 28, 2005
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005 95(4):458-464; doi:10.1093/bja/aei206
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/4/458    most recent
aei206v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peng, Z.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fok, B. S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peng, Z.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fok, B. S. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journal.permissions@oupjournals.org

An investigation to show the effect of lung fluid on impedance cardiac output in the anaesthetized dog

Z.-Y. Peng, L. A. H. Critchley* and B. S. P. Fok

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China

* Corresponding author. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China. E-mail: hcritchley{at}cuhk.edu.hk

Background. Accumulation of lung fluid in the critically ill patient is believed to attenuate impedance cardiac output (COIC) measurements. However, this phenomenon has never been shown experimentally.

Methods. In eight anaesthetized and ventilated dogs (weight 15–22 kg) a high-precision flow probe was placed on the ascending aorta via a left thoracotomy incision and the direct cardiac output (COFP) was measured. Simultaneous COIC measurements were made using a RheoCardioMonitor (ACMA, Singapore). Lung oedema was induced by intravenous oleic acid 0.1 mg kg–1. Lung fluid was assessed by the decrease in basal thoracic impedance (Zb). Percentage errors between the two methods (COIC–COFP) were calculated and compared as Zb decreased at 1 {Omega} intervals.

Results. During the experiment mean Zb decreased from 35.9 (SD 5.2) to 27.8 (6.5) {Omega} (P=0.0037). This occurred over a period of 225 (range 112–338) min and Zb decreased by 1 {Omega} every 51 (22–68) min. The presence of excessive lung fluid was confirmed at post-mortem. Before lung oedema was induced, COIC was 1.5 (0.6) litre min–1 and the corresponding value of COFP was1.5 (0.7) litre min–1 (data from eight dogs). As Zb decreased, and lung fluid accumulated, the error between COIC and COFP widened (P<0.0001, ANOVA for repeated measures). Eventually, COIC decreased to 0.7 (0.3) litre min–1 and the corresponding value of COFP was1.2 (0.3) litre min–1 ({Delta}Zb=5 {Omega}, data from six dogs). Mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure and systemic vascular resistance were kept constant.

Conclusion. The presence of lung fluid attenuates COIC measurements with respect to COFP.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
H. M. C. Kemps, E. J. M. Thijssen, G. Schep, B. T. H. M. Sleutjes, W. R. De Vries, A. R. Hoogeveen, P. F. F. Wijn, and P. A. F. M. Doevendans
Evaluation of two methods for continuous cardiac output assessment during exercise in chronic heart failure patients
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105(6): 1822 - 1829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.