Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on April 1, 2005
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005 94(6):735-741; doi:10.1093/bja/aei122
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/6/735    most recent
aei122v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hucker, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Venn, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hucker, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Venn, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journal.permissions@oupjournals.org


CLINICAL PRACTICE

Identifying the sick: can biochemical measurements be used to aid decision making on presentation to the accident and emergency department

T. R. Hucker1, G. P. Mitchell1, L. D. Blake1, E. Cheek2, V. Bewick2, M. Grocutt3, L. G. Forni1 and R. M. Venn1,*

1 Department of Critical Care and 3 Accident and Emergency Department, Worthing Hospital, Lyndhurst Road, Worthing, West Sussex BN11 2DH, UK. 2 School of Computing, Mathematical and Information Sciences, University of Brighton, West Sussex, UK

* Corresponding author. E-mail: richard.venn{at}wash.nhs.uk

Background. Early and accurate identification of patients who may benefit from aggressive optimal medical intervention is essential if improved outcomes in terms of survival are to be achieved. We studied the usefulness of routine clinical measurements and/or markers of metabolic abnormality in the early identification of those patients at greatest risk of deterioration on presentation to the accident and emergency department.

Methods. We conducted a prospective observational study in the accident and emergency department of a 602-bed district general hospital. Routine clinical measurements (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, temperature, oxygen saturation in room air, level of consciousness and ventilatory frequency) and venous blood analysis for metabolic markers (pH, bicarbonate, standard base excess, lactate, anion gap, strong ion difference, and strong ion gap) and biochemical markers (Na+, K+, Ca+, Cl+, albumin, urea and creatinine) were recorded from unselected consecutive hospital admissions over two 3-month periods (September–November 2002 and February–April 2003).

Results. Logistic regression analysis showed that neither conventional clinical measurements upon presentation to the accident and emergency department nor venous biochemical and metabolic indices have good discriminatory ability when used as single predictors of either hospital mortality or length of hospital stay. Selecting variables from all the clinical and venous blood measurements gave a parsimonious model containing only age, heart rate, phosphate and albumin (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.82 [95% CI 0.76, 0.87]).

Conclusions. A combination of clinical and venous biochemical measurements in the accident and emergency department proved the best predictors of hospital mortality. Consequently, they may be helpful as a triage tool in the accident and emergency department to help identify patients at risk of deterioration.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
B. Silke, J. Kellett, T. Rooney, K. Bennett, and D. O'Riordan
An improved medical admissions risk system using multivariable fractional polynomial logistic regression modelling
QJM, October 21, 2009; (2009) hcp149v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
G.B. Smith and D.R. Prytherch
Laboratory risk factors for hospital mortality
QJM, January 1, 2008; 101(1): 63 - 63.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
N.J. Beeching, K. Asadollahi, I.M. Hastings, and G.V. Gill
Response
QJM, January 1, 2008; 101(1): 64 - 64.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. W. Duckitt, R. Buxton-Thomas, J. Walker, E. Cheek, V. Bewick, R. Venn, and L. G. Forni
Worthing physiological scoring system: derivation and validation of a physiological early-warning system for medical admissions. An observational, population-based single-centre study
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2007; 98(6): 769 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
B D Adams, T A Bonzani, and C J Hunter
The anion gap does not accurately screen for lactic acidosis in emergency department patients
Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 179 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.