Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on February 18, 2005
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005 94(5):626-629; doi:10.1093/bja/aei096
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/5/626    most recent
aei096v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westerén-Punnonen, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Partanen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westerén-Punnonen, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Partanen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journal.permissions{at}oupjournals.org


CASE REPORT

Recovery of N100 component of auditory event-related potentials and EEG after cardiac arrest during propofol sedation

S. M. Westerén-Punnonen1,*, H. Yppärilä1,3, T. Musialowicz2, I. Korhonen3, M. Hynynen4 and J. Partanen1

1 Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and 2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland. 3 VTT Information Technology, Tampere, Finland. 4 Departments of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Jorvi Hospital, Espoo, Finland

* Corresponding author. E-mail: susanna.westeren-punnonen{at}kuh.fi

We report on the EEG monitoring of a patient who suffered an episode of postoperative ventricular fibrillation (VF) following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). VF initially caused a considerable suppression and slowing of the EEG. The recovery of cerebral function was evaluated by recording both EEG and auditory event related potentials (ERPs). Six hours after the episode of VF, when the patient was asleep but arousable to voice command, the N100 component of the auditory ERPs had recovered to the level measured before the operation, whereas the EEG was still very slow for that level of sedation. This may have been due to VF having less effect on the N100 component than on the background EEG. Our findings suggest that measuring evoked potentials may improve the evaluation of brain function after cardiac arrest.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.