Skip Navigation

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005 94(2):249; doi:10.1093/bja/aei508
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akerman, N.
Right arrow Articles by Wildsmith, J. A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akerman, N.
Right arrow Articles by Wildsmith, J. A. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005

CORRESPONDENCE

Intrathecal drug spread

E-mail: nic_lucy@hotmail.com

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Editor—I read with interest the review by Hocking and Wildsmith1 on intrathecal drug spread. I feel they omitted to mention an important aspect of drug spread that could have a bearing for all blocks.

They quite rightly stated that vasoconstrictors added to intrathecal local anaesthetic could prolong the duration of a block, although not affect . . . [Full Text of this Article]

N. Akerman

Leeds, UK

E-mail: chrishutter@mail.com

C. D. D. Hutter

Nottingham, UK

* E-mail: ghocking@doctors.org.uk

G. Hocking1,* and J. A. W. Wildsmith2

1 Oxford, UK
2 Dundee, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?