Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on October 14, 2004
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005 94(1):92-94; doi:10.1093/bja/aeh292
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/1/92    most recent
aeh292v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wald, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wald, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004

CASE REPORT

Experience with the Arndt paediatric bronchial blocker

S. H. Wald*, A. Mahajan, M. B. Kaplan and J. B. Atkinson

Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

* Corresponding author. E-mail: swald{at}mednet.ucla.edu

Previously reported techniques for single lung ventilation in children have failed to provide consistent, single lung ventilation with relative ease and reliability. We report our experience with the use of a new device, the Arndt 5 French (Fr) paediatric endobronchial blocker, for single lung ventilation in a series of 24 children. We were able to achieve single lung ventilation in 23 of the 24 patients (aged 2–16 yr). Placement required approximately 5–15 min. Attempts at placement were aborted in one patient who was unable to tolerate even short periods of apnoea because of lung pathology. Although it has some limitations, our experience suggests that the paediatric bronchial blocker can be used as a consistent, safe method of single lung ventilation in most young children.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
P. Li, W. Liang, and H. Gu
One-lung ventilation using ProsealTM laryngeal mask airway and Arndt endobronchial blocker in paediatric scoliosis surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2009; 103(6): 902 - 903.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
A. M.-H. Ho, M. K. Karmakar, L. A. H. Critchley, S. K. Ng, and C.-Y. Wat
Placing the tip of the endotracheal tube at the carina and passing the endobronchial blocker through the Murphy eye may reduce the risk of blocker retrograde dislodgement during one-lung anaesthesia in small children
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2008; 101(5): 690 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.