BJA Advance Access originally published online on September 17, 2004
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004 93(6):810-817; doi:10.1093/bja/aeh272
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004
Determination of diffusion and partition coefficients of propofol in rat brain tissue: implications for studies of drug action in vitro
1 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA. 2 Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University, California, USA
* Corresponding author. E-mail: rapearce{at}wisc.edu
Background. Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is a widely used general anaesthetic that modulates
-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors, the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptor in the brain. Previous studies have found that the concentration of propofol that is required to affect synaptic inhibition in brain slices is much higher than the free concentration that is achieved clinically and that modulates isolated receptors. We tested whether this is accounted for by slow equilibration in brain tissue, and determined the concentration that must be applied to achieve appropriate brain levels.
Methods. Rat brain slices 300-µm thick were placed in a solution of 100 µM propofol in artificial cerebrospinal fluid for times ranging from 7.5 to 480 min. Concentrations in these slices were measured by HPLC to determine diffusion and partition coefficients. Electrophysiological measurements of the rate at which effects of 5 µM propofol developed were compared with the calculated rate of increase in tissue concentration.
Results. The diffusion coefficient was approximately 0.02x106 cm2 s1, and the brain:artificial cerebrospinal fluid partition coefficient was 36. Diffusion times in brain slices agreed well with time course measurements of propofol-induced depression of synaptic responses, which continued to increase over 5 h. This depression was reversed by blocking GABA inhibition with picrotoxin (100 µM).
Conclusions. Propofol does enhance inhibition in brain slices at a concentration of 0.63 µM in the superfusate, which produces brain concentrations corresponding with those achieved in vivo, but equilibration requires several hours. It is likely that slow diffusion to GABA receptors accounts for the high concentrations (>10 µM) that were needed to depress evoked responses in previous investigations.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. P. Archer and S. H. Roth Low Concentrations of Pentobarbital Enhance Excitability of Rat Hippocampal Neurons Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 993 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Drasbek, K. Hoestgaard-Jensen, and K. Jensen Modulation of Extrasynaptic THIP Conductances by GABAA-Receptor Modulators in Mouse Neocortex J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 2293 - 2300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Kandimalla, G. L. Curran, S. S. Holasek, E. J. Gilles, T. M. Wengenack, M. Ramirez-Alvarado, and J. F. Poduslo Physiological and Biophysical Factors That Influence Alzheimer's Disease Amyloid Plaque Targeting of Native and Putrescine Modified Human Amyloid beta40 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2006; 318(1): 17 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Becker and X. Liu EVALUATION OF THE UTILITY OF BRAIN SLICE METHODS TO STUDY BRAIN PENETRATION Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2006; 34(5): 855 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Y. Cheng, L. J. Martin, E. M. Elliott, J. H. Kim, H. T. J. Mount, F. A. Taverna, J. C. Roder, J. F. MacDonald, A. Bhambri, N. Collinson, et al. Alpha5GABAA receptors mediate the amnestic but not sedative-hypnotic effects of the general anesthetic etomidate. J. Neurosci., April 5, 2006; 26(14): 3713 - 3720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Chen, S. Shu, and D. A. Bayliss Suppression of Ih Contributes to Propofol-Induced Inhibition of Mouse Cortical Pyramidal Neurons J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 3872 - 3883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




