Skip Navigation


BJA Advance Access originally published online on April 30, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/6/793    most recent
aeh139v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by McArdle, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by McArdle, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 6 793-799
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Evaluation of simple criteria to predict successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care patients

T. S. Walsh*, S. Dodds and F. McArdle

Anaesthetics, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, New Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh, Scotland EH16 4SU, UK

*Corresponding author. E-mail: tim{at}walsh.sol.co.uk

Background. There is increasing evidence that weaning protocols improve outcome from mechanical ventilation, but it is unclear how best to implement such protocols in large intensive care units. We evaluated a checklist of simple bedside criteria to determine whether it could be used reliably to predict successful discontinuation of mechanical ventilation.

Methods. We carried out a prospective observational cohort study in a 12-bedded general intensive care unit (ICU). We developed a checklist of metabolic, cardiorespiratory and neurological criteria that suggested that patients should start the weaning process. We performed daily assessments throughout ICU stay and recorded whether the criteria were met. Ultimate ventilator independence was used as the reference standard.

Results. We studied 325 sequential admissions to the ICU. Data were available for 98% of patients; 97% of admissions were mechanically ventilated on admission to ICU. Overall, 205 of the 308 ventilated patients (67%) achieved ventilator independence during ICU admission; the other patients died or were transferred ventilated to other ICUs. Eighty-three per cent of the patients who achieved ventilator independence met the set criteria. Fulfilling the criteria was a moderately strong predictor of ultimate ventilator independence: specificity 89%, positive predictive value 94%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) 7.6. When we analysed data by the day from admission on which patients were examined, the test was a strong predictor of subsequent ventilator independence when criteria were met by day 1 (LR 11.1) or day 2 (LR 6.9), but weaker when met by more than/equal to 4 days (LR <3). Patients who met criteria after more than/equal to 4 days often had prolonged weaning and a high incidence of re-intubation. Patients who achieved ventilator independence without fulfilling the criteria (n=35) had a short duration of mechanical ventilation (median 2 days, interquartile range 1–3 days). The most frequent reason for failing criteria before ventilator independence was a PaO2/FIO2 ratio less than 24 kPa (49% of cases).

Conclusions. A simple checklist can assist nurse assessment of suitability for weaning and could be used as a trigger to commence a weaning protocol. The day on which criteria are met is a useful way of stratifying patients for likely patterns of weaning.

Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 793–9


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ACCP Pulmonary Med Brd RevHome page
C. N. Sessler
Mechanical Ventilatory Support
ACCP Pulmonary Med Brd Rev, January 1, 2009; 25(0): 457 - 478.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
M. A. Halm
Daily Goals Worksheets and Other Checklists: Are Our Critical Care Units Safer?
Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2008; 17(6): 577 - 580.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
B. Hales, M. Terblanche, R. Fowler, and W. Sibbald
Development of medical checklists for improved quality of patient care
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, February 1, 2008; 20(1): 22 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
S. K. Frazier, K. S. Stone, D. Moser, R. Schlanger, C. Carle, L. Pender, J. Widener, and H. Brom
Hemodynamic Changes During Discontinuation of Mechanical Ventilation in Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients
Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2006; 15(6): 580 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.