Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barter, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Imai, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barter, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Imai, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 2 275-277
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Short Communications

Animal dependence of inhaled anaesthetic requirements in cats{dagger}

L. S. Barter*,1, J. E. Ilkiw1, E. P. Steffey1, B. H. Pypendop1 and A. Imai2

1 Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, USA 2 Present address: B32-322-26-6 B Heiwa-Machi Kanazawa, Ishikawa 921-8105, Japan

*Corresponding author. E-mail: lsbarter@ucdavis.edu
{dagger}This study was presented in abstract form at the American College of Veterinary Anesthesiologists Annual Meeting in Orlando, Florida, October 2002.

Background. The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of an inhaled anaesthetic describes its potency as a general anaesthetic. Individuals vary in their sensitivity to anaesthetics and we sought to determine whether an individual animal’s sensitivity to inhaled anaesthetics would be maintained across different agents.

Methods. Six female mongrel cats, age 2 yr (range 1.8–2.3) and mean weight 3.5 (SD 0.3) kg, were studied on three separate occasions over a 12-month period to determine the MAC of isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane. Induction of anaesthesia in a chamber was followed by orotracheal intubation and maintenance of anaesthesia with the inhaled agent in oxygen delivered via a non-rebreathing circuit. MAC was determined in triplicate using standard tail-clamp technique.

Results. Mean MAC values for isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane were 1.90 (SD 0.18), 3.41 (0.65) and 10.27 (1.06)%, respectively. Body temperature, systolic pressure and SpO2 recorded at the time of MAC determinations for isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane were 38.3 (0.3), 38.6 (0.1) and 38.3 (0.3)°C; 71.2 (8.3), 74.6 (15.9) and 88.0 (12.0) mmHg; 99.2 (1.1), 99.1 (1.3) and 99.4 (0.8)%, respectively. Both the anaesthetic agent and the individual cat had significant effects on MAC. Correlation coefficients for comparisons between desflurane and isoflurane, desflurane and sevoflurane, and sevoflurane and isoflurane were 0.90, 0.89 and 0.97, respectively.

Conclusions. These findings show that an individual has a consistent degree of sensitivity to a variety of inhaled anaesthetics, suggesting a genetic basis for sensitivity to inhaled anaesthetic effects.

Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 275–7


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Lab AnimHome page
I A G. de Segura, J B. de la Vibora, and A Criado
Determination of the minimum alveolar concentration for halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane in the gerbil
Lab Anim, July 1, 2009; 43(3): 239 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Barbry, M. Le Guen, V. De Castro, P. Coriat, B. Riou, and B. Vivien
Minimum alveolar concentration of halogenated volatile anaesthetics in left ventricular hypertrophy and congestive heart failure in rats
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2007; 99(6): 787 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.