Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gouws, P.
Right arrow Articles by Allman, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gouws, P.
Right arrow Articles by Allman, K. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 2 228-230
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Clinical Investigations

Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia in cataract extraction

P. Gouws*,1, P. Galloway1, J. Jacob1, W. English2 and K. G. Allman2

1 West of England Eye Unit and 2 Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK

*Corresponding author. E-mail: pieter@gouws.freeserve.co.uk

Background. Articaine is the most widely used local anaesthetic for dental anaesthesia in Germany, Italy and The Netherlands and has recently been introduced and licensed for dental use in the UK. We have previously shown articaine to be superior to a standard mixture of bupivacaine 0.5%/lidocaine 2% for peribulbar anaesthesia. Sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia arguably provides a safer method of anaesthetic delivery for cataract surgery. A blunt cannula is used in this technique, thus greatly reducing the risk of globe perforation, intrathecal injection and sight-threatening periocular haemorrhage.

Methods. We compared articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia in cataract surgery.

Results. Sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia using articaine 2% resulted in a more rapid onset of motor block compared with a bupivacaine/lidocaine (P=0.0076). Ocular movement scores were significantly lower from 2 min after injection until the end of surgery (P=0.031 ANOVA).

Conclusion. Articaine 2% is safe and effective for sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia and is a suitable alternative to the traditional bupivacaine 0.5%/lidocaine 2% mixture.

Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 228–30


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J OphthalmolHome page
S V Raman, J S Barry, S Murjaneh, J Jacob, A Quinn, G Sturrock, S Shaw, and K Allman
Comparison of 4% articaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine/2% lidocaine mixture for sub-Tenon's anaesthesia in phacoemulsification cataract surgery: a randomised controlled trial
Br J Ophthalmol, April 1, 2008; 92(4): 496 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
T. A. King, J. Mitchell, K. Altman, M. Ozdemir, and K. G. Allman
Articaine for sub-Tenon's and peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 595 - 596.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.