Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Ungern-Sternberg, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Reber, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Ungern-Sternberg, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Reber, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 2 202-207
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Effect of obesity and site of surgery on perioperative lung volumes

B. S. von Ungern-Sternberg*, A. Regli, M. C. Schneider, F. Kunz and A. Reber

Department of Anaesthesia, University of Basel/Kantonsspital, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland

*Corresponding author. E-mail: bvonungern@uhbs.ch

Background. Although obese patients are thought to be susceptible to postoperative pulmonary complications, there are only limited data on the relationship between obesity and lung volumes after surgery. We studied how surgery and obesity affect lung volumes measured by spirometry.

Methods. We prospectively studied 161 patients having either breast surgery (Group A, n=80) or lower abdominal laparotomy (Group B, n=81). Premedication and general anaesthesia were standardized. Spirometry was measured with the patient supine, in a 30° head-up position. We measured vital capacity (VC), forced vital capacity, peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in 1 s at preoperative assessment (baseline), after premedication (before induction of anaesthesia) and 10–20 min, 1 h and 3 h after extubation.

Results. Baseline spirometric values were all within the normal range. All perioperative values decreased significantly with increasing body mass index (BMI). The greatest reduction of mean VC (expressed as percentage of baseline values) occurred after extubation, and was more marked after laparotomy than after breast surgery (23 (SD 14)% vs 20 (14)%). Considering patients according to BMI (<25, 25–30, >30), VC decreased after surgery by 12 (7)%, 24 (8)% and 40 (10)%, respectively. VC recovered more rapidly in Group A.

Conclusion. Postoperative reduction in spirometric volumes was related to BMI. Obesity had more effect on VC than the site of surgery.

Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 202–7


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. F. Atkins
COPD and Abdominal Surgery
JAMA, September 12, 2007; 298(10): 1158 - 1158.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. J. Leech, R. Baba, and M. Dhar
Spinal anaesthesia and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for hip surgery in an obese patient with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2007; 98(6): 763 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
K. Y. Yoo, S. C. Lim, Y. H. Kim, and J.-U. Lee
Successful weaning from mechanical ventilation after abdominal lipectomy and omentectomy in an obese patient with multiple rib fractures
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2006; 96(2): 269 - 270.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
B. S. von Ungern-Sternberg, A. Regli, A. Reber, and M. C. Schneider
Effect of obesity and thoracic epidural analgesia on perioperative spirometry
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2005; 94(1): 121 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.