Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, S.
Right arrow Articles by Taniguchi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, S.
Right arrow Articles by Taniguchi, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 2 195-201
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Double lumen tube location predicts tube malposition and hypoxaemia during one lung ventilation

S. Inoue*,1, N. Nishimine1, K. Kitaguchi1, H. Furuya1 and S. Taniguchi2

1 Department of Anaesthesiology and 2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan

*Corresponding author. E-mail: seninoue@nmu-gw.naramed-u.ac.jp

Background. Poor positioning of an endobronchial double lumen tube (DLT) could affect oxygenation during one lung ventilation (OLV). We set out to relate DLT position to hypoxaemia and DLT misplacement during OLV.

Methods. We recruited 152 ASA physical status I–II patients about to have elective thoracic surgery. The trachea was intubated with a left-sided DLT. Tube position was assessed by fibre-optic scope and correction was made after patient positioning and during OLV. If PaO2 was less than 10.7 kPa, the DLT position was checked and then PEEP, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), oxygen insufflation, or two lung ventilation (TLV) were tried.

Results. The DLT was found to be misplaced in 49 patients (32%) after patient positioning, and in 38 patients (25%) during OLV. PEEP to the dependent lung, CPAP or apneic oxygen insufflation to the non-dependent lung, or brief periods of TLV, were applied in 46 patients (30%). Patients who had DLT malposition after placing the patient in the lateral position had a greater incidence of DLT malposition during OLV (59 vs 9%) and also required each intervention more frequently (57 vs 10%). Patients with DLT malposition during OLV also required interventions more often (84 vs 12%).

Conclusions. Patients who have DLT malposition after placing the patient in the lateral position had more DLT malposition during OLV and hypoxaemia during OLV.

Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 195–201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. Steinmann, C. A. Stahl, J. Minner, S. Schumann, T. Loop, A. Kirschbaum, H. J. Priebe, and J. Guttmann
Electrical impedance tomography to confirm correct placement of double-lumen tube: a feasibility study
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2008; 101(3): 411 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Al-Abdullatief, A. Wahood, N. Al-Shirawi, Y. Arabi, M. Wahba, M. Al-Jumah, S. Al-Sheha, and N. Yamani
Awake anaesthesia for major thoracic surgical procedures: an observational study
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 32(2): 346 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Fortier, D. Cote, J. Soucy, R. Lelievre, J. Bussieres, S. Inoue, N. Nishimine, K. Kitaguchi, H. Furuya, and S. Taniguchi
Left double lumen tube malposition
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2004; 93(3): 475 - 476.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.