Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernández, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Parrilla, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernández, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Parrilla, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004, Vol. 92, No. 1 89-92
© 2004 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Clinical Investigations

Cardiovascular changes during drainage of pericardial effusion by thoracoscopy

J. A. Fernández*,1, R. Robles1, F. Acosta2, T. Sansano2 and P. Parrilla1

1 Servicio de Cirugía I and 2 Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar S/N, Murcia E-30120, Spain

*Corresponding author. E-mail: jumanjico@yahoo.com

Background. Cardiovascular changes during drainage of pericardial effusion are not well understood, and most studies are of systemic effects and not of right ventricular performance. Thoracoscopy is not widely used to drain pericardial effusions because of haemodynamic changes in relation to the use of single lung ventilation.

Patients and methods. We studied 16 patients undergoing partial pericardiectomy for pericardial effusion, using videothoracoscopy with a low-pressure pneumothorax (6 mm Hg). Cardiac output was measured by thermodilution with the patient anaesthetized in the supine position before the procedure; in the right lateral position after a low-pressure pneumothorax had been established; and after drainage of the pericardial effusion.

Results. Before the procedure, cardiac output was low and central venous pressure and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure were increased. Systemic vascular resistance and arterial blood pressure were within normal limits. Cardiac filling pressure and pulmonary arterial pressure increased during the pneumothorax. After the drainage cardiac index increased and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances were reduced.

Conclusions. Pericardial effusion reduces right ventricular distensibility, right and left systolic ventricular function, and cardiac output. Anaesthesia with mechanical ventilation and a low-pressure pneumothorax do not affect the circulation greatly. Drainage of the pericardial effusion allows cardiac distensibility to increase and cardiac performance changes to allow increased ejection.

Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 89–92


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.